summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/mainboard/google/foster/chromeos.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-10-15Revert "vboot_logic: Set VB2_CONTEXT_EC_TRUSTED in verstage_main"Hsuan-ting Chen
This reverts commit 6260bf712a836762b18d80082505e981e040f4bc. Reason for revert: This CL did not handle Intel GPIO correctly. We need to add GPIO_EC_IN_RW into early_gpio_table for platforms using Intel SoC. Signed-off-by: Hsuan Ting Chen <roccochen@chromium.org> Change-Id: Iaeb1bf598047160f01e33ad0d9d004cad59e3f75 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/57951 Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-09-16vboot_logic: Set VB2_CONTEXT_EC_TRUSTED in verstage_mainHsuan Ting Chen
vboot_reference is introducing a new field (ctx) to store the current boot mode in crrev/c/2944250 (ctx->bootmode), which will be leveraged in both vboot flow and elog_add_boot_reason in coreboot. In current steps of deciding bootmode, a function vb2ex_ec_trusted is required. This function checks gpio EC_IN_RW pin and will return 'trusted' only if EC is not in RW. Therefore, we need to implement similar utilities in coreboot. We will deprecate vb2ex_ec_trusted and use the flag, VB2_CONTEXT_EC_TRUSTED, in vboot, vb2api_fw_phase1 and set that flag in coreboot, verstage_main. Also add a help function get_ec_is_trusted which needed to be implemented per mainboard. BUG=b:177196147, b:181931817 BRANCH=none TEST=Test on trogdor if manual recovery works Signed-off-by: Hsuan Ting Chen <roccochen@chromium.org> Change-Id: I479c8f80e45cc524ba87db4293d19b29bdfa2192 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/57048 Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com> Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-06-03mb/google/foster: Remove EC_GOOGLE_CHROMEEC stubsKyösti Mälkki
Board does not have ChromeEC. Change-Id: Id6ab2495d6e082fdcb71ec5162efde877d97ce22 Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41983 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2020-05-11treewide: Remove "this file is part of" linesPatrick Georgi
Stefan thinks they don't add value. Command used: sed -i -e '/file is part of /d' $(git grep "file is part of " |egrep ":( */\*.*\*/\$|#|;#|-- | *\* )" | cut -d: -f1 |grep -v crossgcc |grep -v gcov | grep -v /elf.h |grep -v nvramtool) The exceptions are for: - crossgcc (patch file) - gcov (imported from gcc) - elf.h (imported from GNU's libc) - nvramtool (more complicated header) The removed lines are: - fmt.Fprintln(f, "/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */") -# This file is part of a set of unofficial pre-commit hooks available -/* This file is part of coreboot */ -# This file is part of msrtool. -/* This file is part of msrtool. */ - * This file is part of ncurses, designed to be appended after curses.h.in -/* This file is part of pgtblgen. */ - * This file is part of the coreboot project. - /* This file is part of the coreboot project. */ -# This file is part of the coreboot project. -# This file is part of the coreboot project. -## This file is part of the coreboot project. --- This file is part of the coreboot project. -/* This file is part of the coreboot project */ -/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */ -;## This file is part of the coreboot project. -# This file is part of the coreboot project. It originated in the - * This file is part of the coreinfo project. -## This file is part of the coreinfo project. - * This file is part of the depthcharge project. -/* This file is part of the depthcharge project. */ -/* This file is part of the ectool project. */ - * This file is part of the GNU C Library. - * This file is part of the libpayload project. -## This file is part of the libpayload project. -/* This file is part of the Linux kernel. */ -## This file is part of the superiotool project. -/* This file is part of the superiotool project */ -/* This file is part of uio_usbdebug */ Change-Id: I82d872b3b337388c93d5f5bf704e9ee9e53ab3a9 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41194 Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-04-06mb/google/foster: Use SPDX for GPL-2.0-only filesAngel Pons
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now. Change-Id: If2b94a05ccbb3bead292713719fdc914d96dbd0f Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40173 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
2020-03-18mainboard/google: Remove copyright noticesPatrick Georgi
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example: - What's a "Copyright $year-present"? - Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current copyright holder? - People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even though they only deleted stuff - Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year, because why not? - Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"? - Or "Generated Code"? Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead and use the git history to deal with the rest. Change-Id: I09cc279b1f75952bb397de2c3f2b299255163685 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39607 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
2020-03-07chromeos: stop sharing write protect GPIO with depthchargeJoel Kitching
wpsw_boot is deprecated in favour of wpsw_cur. As such, coreboot no longer needs to share "write protect" GPIO with depthcharge. BUG=b:124141368, chromium:950273 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I2fcb7f82aa063fd72928171af5cbef0356ba620c Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Cq-Depend: chromium:2088434 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39318 Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-10-20src: Remove unused 'include <string.h>'Elyes HAOUAS
Change-Id: I2a94c3b6282e9915fd2b8136b124740c8a7b774c Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36082 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
2019-05-13mainboard: remove "recovery" gpio, selectively add "presence" gpio.Matt Delco
The gpio table is only used by depthcharge, and depthcharge rarely has a need for the "recovery" gpio. On a few boards it does use the gpio as a signal for confirming physical presence, so on that boards we'll advertise the board as "presence". All these strings probably should have been #defines to help avoid typos (e.g., the "ec_in_rw" in stout seems questionable since everybody else uses "EC in RW"). Cq-Depend: chromium:1580454 BUG=b:129471321 BRANCH=None TEST=Local compile and flash (with corresponding changes to depthcharge) to 2 systems, one with a "presence" gpio and another without. Confirmed that both systems could enter dev mode. Change-Id: Id6d62d9e48d3e6646cbc1277ea53f0ca95dd849e Signed-off-by: Matt Delco <delco@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32718 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2019-04-23src: Use include <console/console.h> when appropriateElyes HAOUAS
Change-Id: Iddba5b03fc554a6edc4b26458d834e47958a6b08 Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32214 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com> Reviewed-by: David Guckian
2019-04-11chromeos: clean up "recovery" and "write protect" GPIOsJoel Kitching
The "write protect" GPIO's cached value is never actually read after entering depthcharge. Ensure the value from get_write_protect_state() is being transferred accurately, so that we may read this GPIO value in depthcharge without resampling. The cached value of the "recovery" GPIO is read only on certain boards which have a physical recovery switch. Correct some of the values sent to boards which presumably never read the previously incorrect value. Most of these inaccuracies are from non-inverted values on ACTIVE_LOW GPIOs. BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753, chromium:950273 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: Ic17a98768703d7098480a9233b752fe5b201bd51 Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32233 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2019-03-27chromeos: update old boards to use lb_add_gpios notationJoel Kitching
Instead of manually filling out the lb_gpios struct, use the newer lb_add_gpios notation, which is more compact and less error-prone. BUG=b:124141368 TEST=util/lint/checkpatch.pl -g origin/master..HEAD TEST=util/abuild/abuild -B -e -y -c 50 -p none -x BRANCH=none Change-Id: I90795f32be5de881c94519933f36127098c184df Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32031 Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-03-08coreboot: Replace all IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XXX) with CONFIG(XXX)Julius Werner
This patch is a raw application of find src/ -type f | xargs sed -i -e 's/IS_ENABLED\s*(CONFIG_/CONFIG(/g' Change-Id: I6262d6d5c23cabe23c242b4f38d446b74fe16b88 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31774 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2017-11-22chromeec: Change the API for hostevent/wake masks to handle 64-bitFurquan Shaikh
ChromeEC is getting ready to bump up the hostevents and wake masks to 64-bits. The current commands to program hostevents/wake masks will still operate on 32-bits only. A new EC host command will be added to handle 64-bit hostevents/wake masks. In order to prevent individual callers in coreboot from worrying about 32-bit/64-bit, the same API provided by google/chromeec will be updated to accept 64-bit parameters and return 64-bit values. Internally, host command handlers will take care of masking these parameters/return values to appropriate 32-bit/64-bit values. BUG=b:69329196 Change-Id: If59f3f2b1a2aa5ce95883df3e72efc4a32de1190 Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/22551 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2017-07-06mainboard/[g-l]: add IS_ENABLED() around Kconfig symbol referencesMartin Roth
Change-Id: I1f906c8c465108017bc4d08534653233078ef32d Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20343 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2017-03-28vboot: Assume EC_SOFTWARE_SYNC and VIRTUAL_DEV_SWITCH by defaultJulius Werner
The virtualized developer switch was invented five years ago and has been used on every vboot system ever since. We shouldn't need to specify it again and again for every new board. This patch flips the Kconfig logic around and replaces CONFIG_VIRTUAL_DEV_SWITCH with CONFIG_PHYSICAL_DEV_SWITCH, so that only a few ancient boards need to set it and it fits better with CONFIG_PHYSICAL_REC_SWITCH. (Also set the latter for Lumpy which seems to have been omitted incorrectly, and hide it from menuconfig since it's a hardware parameter that shouldn't be configurable.) Since almost all our developer switches are virtual, it doesn't make sense for every board to pass a non-existent or non-functional developer mode switch in the coreboot tables, so let's get rid of that. It's also dangerously confusing for many boards to define a get_developer_mode() function that reads an actual pin (often from a debug header) which will not be honored by coreboot because CONFIG_PHYSICAL_DEV_SWITCH isn't set. Therefore, this patch removes all those non-functional instances of that function. In the future, either the board has a physical dev switch and must define it, or it doesn't and must not. In a similar sense (and since I'm touching so many board configs anyway), it's annoying that we have to keep selecting EC_SOFTWARE_SYNC. Instead, it should just be assumed by default whenever a Chrome EC is present in the system. This way, it can also still be overridden by menuconfig. CQ-DEPEND=CL:459701 Change-Id: If9cbaa7df530580a97f00ef238e3d9a8a86a4a7f Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18980 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2015-10-31tree: drop last paragraph of GPL copyright headerPatrick Georgi
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address. Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we imported) looks out for that. This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further editing. Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2015-06-30google/foster: add new mainboardPatrick Georgi
This is an nvidia t210 based board. This includes Chrome OS downstream up to Change-Id: Ic89ed54c. Change-Id: I8630e86a4b0e8756693f8989ce147d6d762cefe1 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10634 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>