aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/mainboard/google/eve/chromeos.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-03-07chromeos: stop sharing write protect GPIO with depthchargeJoel Kitching
wpsw_boot is deprecated in favour of wpsw_cur. As such, coreboot no longer needs to share "write protect" GPIO with depthcharge. BUG=b:124141368, chromium:950273 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I2fcb7f82aa063fd72928171af5cbef0356ba620c Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Cq-Depend: chromium:2088434 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39318 Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-07-25mb/*/chromeos.c: Remove some ENV_RAMSTAGE and __SIMPLE_DEVICE__Kyösti Mälkki
Use explicit simple PCI config accessors here. Change-Id: Ifa3814fdd7795479ca5fdbfc4deb3fe8db9805f3 Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34519 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
2019-05-13mainboard: remove "recovery" gpio, selectively add "presence" gpio.Matt Delco
The gpio table is only used by depthcharge, and depthcharge rarely has a need for the "recovery" gpio. On a few boards it does use the gpio as a signal for confirming physical presence, so on that boards we'll advertise the board as "presence". All these strings probably should have been #defines to help avoid typos (e.g., the "ec_in_rw" in stout seems questionable since everybody else uses "EC in RW"). Cq-Depend: chromium:1580454 BUG=b:129471321 BRANCH=None TEST=Local compile and flash (with corresponding changes to depthcharge) to 2 systems, one with a "presence" gpio and another without. Confirmed that both systems could enter dev mode. Change-Id: Id6d62d9e48d3e6646cbc1277ea53f0ca95dd849e Signed-off-by: Matt Delco <delco@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32718 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2019-01-16buildsystem: Promote rules.h to default includeKyösti Mälkki
Does not fix 3rdparty/, *.S or *.ld or yet. Change-Id: I66b48013dd89540b35ab219d2b64bc13f5f19cda Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/17656 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
2017-03-28vboot: Assume EC_SOFTWARE_SYNC and VIRTUAL_DEV_SWITCH by defaultJulius Werner
The virtualized developer switch was invented five years ago and has been used on every vboot system ever since. We shouldn't need to specify it again and again for every new board. This patch flips the Kconfig logic around and replaces CONFIG_VIRTUAL_DEV_SWITCH with CONFIG_PHYSICAL_DEV_SWITCH, so that only a few ancient boards need to set it and it fits better with CONFIG_PHYSICAL_REC_SWITCH. (Also set the latter for Lumpy which seems to have been omitted incorrectly, and hide it from menuconfig since it's a hardware parameter that shouldn't be configurable.) Since almost all our developer switches are virtual, it doesn't make sense for every board to pass a non-existent or non-functional developer mode switch in the coreboot tables, so let's get rid of that. It's also dangerously confusing for many boards to define a get_developer_mode() function that reads an actual pin (often from a debug header) which will not be honored by coreboot because CONFIG_PHYSICAL_DEV_SWITCH isn't set. Therefore, this patch removes all those non-functional instances of that function. In the future, either the board has a physical dev switch and must define it, or it doesn't and must not. In a similar sense (and since I'm touching so many board configs anyway), it's annoying that we have to keep selecting EC_SOFTWARE_SYNC. Instead, it should just be assumed by default whenever a Chrome EC is present in the system. This way, it can also still be overridden by menuconfig. CQ-DEPEND=CL:459701 Change-Id: If9cbaa7df530580a97f00ef238e3d9a8a86a4a7f Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18980 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2016-11-18google/chromeec: Add common infrastructure for boot-mode switchesFurquan Shaikh
Instead of defining the same functions for reading/clearing boot-mode switches from EC in every mainboard, add a common infrastructure to enable common functions for handling boot-mode switches if GOOGLE_CHROMEEC is being used. Only boards that were not moved to this new infrastructure are those that do not use GOOGLE_CHROMEEC or which rely on some mainboard specific mechanism for reading boot-mode switches. BUG=None BRANCH=None TEST=abuild compiles all boards successfully with and without ChromeOS option. Change-Id: I267aadea9e616464563df04b51a668b877f0d578 Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/17449 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2016-11-01google/eve: Add new boardDuncan Laurie
Add the eve board files using kabylake and FSP 2.0. BUG=chrome-os-partner:58666 TEST=build and boot on eve board Change-Id: I7ca71fe052608d710ee65d078df7af7b55d382bc Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/17177 Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)