| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now.
Change-Id: I1122cdc74a71be6d108998fe7027033394ed6459
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40167
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I09cc279b1f75952bb397de2c3f2b299255163685
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39607
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
|
|
INT_MODEL defined in ACPI 1.0 and renamed to reserved since V 2.0.
The value for this field is zero but 1 is allowed to maintain
compatibility with ACPI 1.0.
So set this value to zero as we are using greater version than ACPI 1.0.
Change-Id: I910ead4e5618c958a7989f4c309a3a4bb938e31a
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/29986
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Guckian
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I91b54b43c8bb5cb17ff86a6d9afa95f265ee49df
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31431
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
The assignment of header->checksum was in some cases done twice, or
unnecessarily split into two lines.
Change-Id: Ib0c0890d7589e6a24b11e9bda10e6969c7d73c56
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28988
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc@marcjonesconsulting.com>
|
|
Most FADT report using ACPIv3 FADT table. Using the get revision
function keeps the table versions in sync.
Change-Id: Ie554faf1be65c7034dd0836f0029cdc79eae1aed
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marcj303@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28277
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
Haswell, Broadwell, Baytrail, and Braswell ChromeOS devices'
FADT version were incorrectly set to 3, rather than the correct
ACPI_FADT_REV_ACPI_3_0. The incorrect value resulted in these
devices reporting compliance to ACPI 2.0, rather than ACPI 3.0.
This mirrors similar recent changes to SKL and APL SoCs.
Test: boot any affected device and check ACPI version reported
vai FADT header using OS-appropriate tools.
Change-Id: I689d2f848f4b8e5750742ea07f31162ee36ff64d
Signed-off-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19498
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Couzens <lynxis@fe80.eu>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Add initial files for the cyan board.
Matches chromium tree at 927026db
This board uses the Braswell FSP 1.1 image and does not build
without the FspUpdVpd.h file.
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
Test=Build and run on cyan
Change-Id: I935839be033c25e197e78fbee306104b4162a99a
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10182
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
