| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Instead of defining the same functions for reading/clearing boot-mode
switches from EC in every mainboard, add a common infrastructure to
enable common functions for handling boot-mode switches if
GOOGLE_CHROMEEC is being used.
Only boards that were not moved to this new infrastructure are those
that do not use GOOGLE_CHROMEEC or which rely on some mainboard specific
mechanism for reading boot-mode switches.
BUG=None
BRANCH=None
TEST=abuild compiles all boards successfully with and without ChromeOS
option.
Change-Id: I267aadea9e616464563df04b51a668b877f0d578
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/17449
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
Use the ACPI generator for creating the Chrome OS gpio
package. Each mainboard has its own list of Chrome OS
gpios that are fed into a helper to generate the ACPI
external OIPG package. Additionally, the common
chromeos.asl is now conditionally included based on
CONFIG_CHROMEOS.
Change-Id: I1d3d951964374a9d43521879d4c265fa513920d2
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15909
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
|
|
With VBOOT_VERIFY_FIRMWARE separated from CHROMEOS, move recovery and
developer mode check functions to vboot. Thus, get rid of the
BOOTMODE_STRAPS option which controlled these functions under src/lib.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:55639
Change-Id: Ia2571026ce8976856add01095cc6be415d2be22e
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15868
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
A long time ago many Chrome OS boards had pages full of duplicated
boilerplate code for the fill_lb_gpios() function, and we spent a lot of
time bikeshedding a proper solution that passes a table of lb_gpio
structs which can be concisely written with a static struct initializer
in http://crosreview.com/234648. Unfortunately we never really finished
that patch and in the mean time a different solution using the
fill_lb_gpio() helper got standardized onto most boards.
Still, that solution is not quite as clean and concise as the one we had
already designed, and it also wasn't applied consistently to all recent
boards (causing more boards with bad code to get added afterwards). This
patch switches all boards newer than Link to the better solution and
also adds some nicer debug output for the GPIOs while I'm there.
If more boards need to be converted from fill_lb_gpio() to this model
later (e.g. from a branch), it's quite easy to do with:
s/fill_lb_gpio(gpio++,\n\?\s*\([^,]*\),\n\?\s*\([^,]*\),\n\?\s*\([^,]*\),\n\?\s*\([^,]*\));/\t{\1, \2, \4, \3},/
Based on a patch by Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>.
BUG=None
BRANCH=None
TEST=Booted on Oak. Ran abuild -x.
Change-Id: I449974d1c75c8ed187f5e10935495b2f03725811
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14226
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Add initial files for the cyan board.
Matches chromium tree at 927026db
This board uses the Braswell FSP 1.1 image and does not build
without the FspUpdVpd.h file.
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
Test=Build and run on cyan
Change-Id: I935839be033c25e197e78fbee306104b4162a99a
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10182
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
