Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
1. The original algorithm for I2C speed cannot always make the
timing meet I2C specification so a new algorithm is introduced
to calculate the timing parameters more correctly.
2. Some I2C buses should be initialized in a different speed while
the original implementation was fixed at fast mode (400Khz).
So the mtk_i2c_bus_init is now also taking an extra speed
parameter.
There is an equivalent change in kernel side:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c?h=v5.15-rc3&id=be5ce0e97cc7a5c0d2da45d617b7bc567c3d3fa1
BUG=b:189899864
TEST=Test on Tomato, boot pass and timing pass
at 100/300/400/500/800/1000Khz.
Signed-off-by: Daolong Zhu <jg_daolongzhu@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com>
Change-Id: Id25b7bb3a76908a7943b940eb5bee799e80626a0
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58053
Reviewed-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Add GPIO "rt1011 reset" and i2c2 initialization for RT1011.
Add CHERRY_USE_RT1011 and CHERRY_USE_RT1019 to Kconfig, so we can
spearate code for the specific codec by config.
Signed-off-by: Trevor Wu <trevor.wu@mediatek.com>
Change-Id: I18939a2a2caae0444ce17f4712764647975121ad
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/57157
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Some eMMCs need 80+ms for CMD1 to complete. And the payload may need to
access eMMC in the very early stage (for example, Depthcharge needs it
20ms after started) so we have to start initialization in coreboot.
BUG=b:195274787
TEST=emerge-cherry coreboot
BRANCH=cherry
Signed-off-by: Wenbin Mei <wenbin.mei@mediatek.com>
Change-Id: Idc86f9121fa4a34f09a683f7a81087c13ea3dd42
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/56842
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
|
|
When accessing I2C, we should use the official names (I2Cx)
instead of magic numbers.
Signed-off-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
Change-Id: I17cc4c87f5ad26deeb5e529d1c106b697a53591b
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/56504
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
For new MT8195 devices we will control mt6360 via EC,
so we have to add ec function of controlling MT6360 and
add CONFIG to separate them.
Signed-off-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
Change-Id: Ic2228f5b45173f0905ea66a3a1f00ec820e0f855
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/56446
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
|
|
TEST=boot kernel from sd card pass on Cherry board.
Signed-off-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
Change-Id: Ic20a2f3f053130ded202cf5ec861450f0f18eed0
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/56437
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
With the new definition of mt6360_regulator_id,
merge the MT6360 LDO and PMIC interfaces into one.
Signed-off-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
Change-Id: I7ccc32cb0a9481d5f55349c152267a44fe09d20a
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/56435
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
|
|
Add initialization of DPM drvier used by DRAM calibration test.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Chuang <ryan.chuang@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com>
Change-Id: I8bd10864267dfa4db8528d40483eccee2d05c1d3
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55775
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
|
|
To enable display, we have to:
1. Configure panel power and backlight
2. Configure eDP driver
BUG=b:189985956
Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
Change-Id: Ida6c157a6a3bd904d3fa3dd2001385ced34f7711
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55574
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
This patch adds support for SPM. This adds 43ms to the boot time.
TEST=program counter of SPM is correct value after booting up.
Signed-off-by: Dawei Chien <dawei.chien@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Edward-JW Yang <edward-jw.yang@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
Change-Id: I5f17f6d51fc9ad2d23c71c3c5cd29fdc777dc071
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55154
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
To support gpio reset SoC, we need to pass the reset gpio parameter to
BL31.
TEST=execute `echo b > /proc/sysrq-trigger` to reboot system
Change-Id: I1a55216c0d5a00bbdb373d931bd50ebe7ca5694f
Signed-off-by: Yidi Lin <yidi.lin@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/54013
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
|
|
Both mt8192 and mt8195 use MT659P RTC. Move mt8192/rtc.c to common
folder and rename to rtc_mt6359p.c.
Signed-off-by: Yuchen Huang <yuchen.huang@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com>
Signed-off-by: Yidi Lin <yidi.lin@mediatek.com>
Change-Id: I73ea90512228a659657f2019249e7142c673e68e
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/53897
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I0ed82e860612e8a62f361e60d217280f775ab239
Signed-off-by: Wenbin Mei <wenbin.mei@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yidi Lin <yidi.lin@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/53895
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|