| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
With commits 9987534 [southbridge/intel: Remove leftover TPM ACPI code]
and 66ce18c [soc/intel: Remove legacy static TPM asl code] removing
TPM ASL code from the southbridge's LPCB device, the LPC TPM chip driver
(drivers/pc80/tpm) must be added to devicetree in order to ensure the
new acpigen code is used to replace it.
Test: boot various google/samsung boards, verify SSDT created with
LPBC.TPM device and TPM visible to and usable by SeaBIOS and Linux
Change-Id: Iedaa01f26fb357914549bb3dda24b0bd6ef67480
Signed-off-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27786
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Not used anywhere.
Change-Id: I9bab092d285aaebdf9283ba08e23197f9785b3a6
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10329
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Reinecke <nr@das-labor.org>
|
|
Old igd.asl had inconsistent addresses (between _DOD and actual device)
and ghost devices. Any of those is enough to make brightness on windows
fail and make igd.asl out-of-ACPI-spec. Also old code favoured ridiculous
copying of the same thing 6 times per chipset. Leave only hooking up and
chipset-specific part in chipset directory. Move NVS handling and ACPI-spec
parts to a common file.
Change-Id: I556769e5e28b83e7465e3db689e26c8c0ab44757
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7472
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <edward.ocallaghan@koparo.com>
Reviewed-by: Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineeringinc.com>
|
|
I thought this wasn't going to work, and observing the timC detection
failure of early tests, I was getting somewhat discouraged; however,
this works. I've tried it with all possible permutations of the
following memory modules:
* 2 GiB single-rank DDR3-1600
* 4 GiB single-rank DDR3-1600
* 4 GiB dual-rank DDR3-1600
I did notice a limited number of memtest errors during one of the
runs, but they were in an address range that is otherwise marked as
reserved. I wrote that off as "maybe something was doing MMIO there
just when memtest was poking the address range". I was not able to
reproduce that error.
Change-Id: Ibd52e1d52fc8d900591d6a488f9a5b4d1e5e4fd3
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8477
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@gmail.com>
|
|
On those chipsets the pins are just a legacy concept. Real interrupts are
messages on corresponding busses or some internal logic of chipset.
Hence interrupt routing isn't anymore board-specific (dependent on layout) but
depends only on configuration.
Rather than attempting to sync real config, ACPI and legacy descriptors, just
use the same interrupt routing per chipset covering all possible devices.
The only part which remains board-specific are LPC and PCI interrupts.
Interrupt balancing may suffer from such merge but:
a) Doesn't seem to be the case of this map on current systems
b) Almost all OS use MSI nowadays bypassing this stuff completely
c) If we want a good balancing we need to take into account that e.g.
wlan card may be placed in a different slot and so would require complicated
balancing on runtime. It's difficult to maintain with almost no benefit.
Change-Id: I9f63d1d338c5587ebac7a52093e5b924f6e5ca2d
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7130
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I04ed600796c55f5af4f0a07687f676e6484a9830
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7200
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Reinecke <nr@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Ability to choose compatibility mode is interesting for testing payloads and
OS for compatibility with older systems.
As per comments
"ide_legacy_combined # TODO: Does nothing since
generations, remove from sb code?"
The "combined" mode was removed. It wasn't used by any mobo and the code for
it is almost identical to IDE one other than few bits relating to interrupt
handling and ISA mode.
Change-Id: I407a8fac753b513812a86bef5abcf39c6d81472e
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4658
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
Force link speed on these platforms to 3 Gbps to defeat buggy SATA
drives.
Change-Id: Ia38a7c486fb1f4469cd67ca5244bbf61f877d556
Signed-off-by: Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2823
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
The name lapic_cluster is a bit misleading, since the construct is not local
APIC specific by concept. As implementations and hardware change, be more
generic about our naming. This will allow us to support non-x86 systems without
adding new keywords.
Change-Id: Icd7f5fcf6f54d242eabb5e14ee151eec8d6cceb1
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2377
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
The name pci_domain was a bit misleading, since the construct is only
PCI specific in a particular (northbridge/cpu) implementation, but not
by concept. As implementations and hardware change, be more generic
about our naming. This will allow us to support non-PCI systems without
adding new keywords.
Change-Id: Ide885a1d5e15d37560c79b936a39252150560e85
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2376
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
We're happy to announce coreboot support for the "Butterfly"
Chromebook, a.k.a HP Pavilion Chromebook.
More information at:
http://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/devices/hp-pavilion-chromebook.html
This commit also includes support for the ENE KB3940Q embedded controller
running on Quanta's firmware.
Change-Id: I194f847a94005218ec04eeba091c3257ac459510
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2359
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
