| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Change-Id: I6c77f4289b46646872731ef9c20dc115f0cf876d
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29161
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
The assignment of header->checksum was in some cases done twice, or
unnecessarily split into two lines.
Change-Id: Ib0c0890d7589e6a24b11e9bda10e6969c7d73c56
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28988
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc@marcjonesconsulting.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I80dd65484fd52e9048635091fb20a123e959e999
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27869
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I0458e4fe08e32daf0b880e0a29752297e8159fe6
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/26617
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
As far as I can see this Kconfig option was used wrong ever since it
was added. According to the commit message of 107f72e (Re-declare
CACHE_ROM_SIZE as aligned ROM_SIZE for MTRR), it was only necessary
to prevent overlapping with CAR.
Let's handle the potential overlap in C macros instead and get rid
of that option. Currently, it was only used by most FSP1.0 boards,
and only because the `fsp1_0/Kconfig` set it to CBFS_SIZE (WTF?).
Change-Id: I4d0096f14a9d343c2e646e48175fe2127198a822
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/26566
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Use of device_t has been abandoned in ramstage.
Change-Id: I5928e871b8e9ba5964c02fbabb7a9d8dc9ecc0a8
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/26082
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
|
|
Fix the values that were off by one.
This was discovered when using postcar stage that prints with
debuglevel BIOS_NEVER.
Change-Id: I73a077950ed0dc735d89c9747a8da0a25f30822d
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/23186
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
There have been discussions about removing this since it does not seem
to be used much and only creates troubles for boards without defaults,
not to mention that it was configurable on many boards that do not
even feature uart.
It is still possible to configure the baudrate through the Kconfig
option.
Change-Id: I71698d9b188eeac73670b18b757dff5fcea0df41
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19682
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
|
|
Changes the offsets of some options so that options that span multiple
bytes are byte aligned.
To make the cmos.layout file more consistent some things where moved
around in the cmos.layout of thinkpads X200 and T400.
Change-Id: Ic84a2a5dc6f9c102f041085871c2ed55e2f3692a
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18321
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
|
|
Change-Id: Ic22beaa47476d8c600e4081fc5ad7bc171e0f903
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/17735
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Ifeef04b68760522ce7f230a51f5df354e6da6607
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/17734
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Since commit 3bfd7cc (drivers/pc80: Rework normal / fallback selector
code) the reboot counter stored in `reboot_bits` isn't reset on a reboot
with `boot_option = 1` any more. Hence, with SKIP_MAX_REBOOT_CNT_CLEAR
enabled, later stages (e.g. payload, OS) have to clear the counter too,
when they want to switch to normal boot. So change the bits to (h)ex
instead of (r)eserved.
To clarify their meaning, rename `reboot_bits` to `reboot_counter`. Also
remove all occurences of the obsolete `last_boot` bit that have sneaked
in again since 24391321 (mainboard: Remove last_boot NVRAM option).
Change-Id: Ib3fc38115ce951b75374e0d1347798b23db7243c
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/16157
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com>
Reviewed-by: York Yang <york.yang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
FSP1_0 places romstage ram stack at fixed location of
RAMTOP in low memory before returning to coreboot proper.
There is no possibility of making a complete backup of
RAMBASE..RAMTOP region and currently such backup is not
even attempted.
As a conclusion, S3 resume would always cause OS memory
corruption.
Change-Id: I5b9dd4069082e022b01b0d6a9ad5dec28a06e8b0
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15576
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
This is to match the layout of the non-fsp baytrail to make comparisons
easier and possibly remove duplicate files.
Change-Id: I9a94842d724ab3826de711d398227e7bdc1045ff
Signed-off-by: Ben Gardner <gardner.ben@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/12686
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch adds esd atom15 board with
Intel Atom E3815 SoC.
Change-Id: I430a40ad8ab3316d34ec5567329370f69db3f15e
Signed-off-by: Michael Tasche <michael.tasche@esd.eu>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/12632
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
