| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Kconfig became stricter on what it accepts, so accomodate before
updating to a new release.
Change-Id: I92a9e9bf0d557a7532ba533cd7776c48f2488f91
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37156
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
* Adding separate targets for 32bit and 64bit qemu
* Using the riscv64 toolchain for 32bit builds requires setting -m elf32lriscv
* rv32/rv64 is currently configured with ARCH_RISCV_RV32/RV64 and not per stage.
This should probably be changed later.
TEST=Boots to "Payload not loaded." on 32bit qemu using the following commands:
util/riscv/make-spike-elf.sh build/coreboot.rom build/coreboot.elf
qemu-system-riscv32 -M virt -m 1024M -nographic -kernel build/coreboot.elf
Change-Id: I35e59b459d1770df10b51fe9e77dcc474d7c75a0
Signed-off-by: Philipp Hug <philipp@hug.cx>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31253
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ibdff50761a205d936b0ebe067f418be0a2051798
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/29871
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Hellsenberg <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: David Guckian
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
|
|
We didn't have a hard_reset() implementation for these boards. So
select the board_reset() stub for them.
Change-Id: I77651e3844632fb1a347008c96e53d23cc5a2646
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29170
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
RISC-V is not a project of the University of California, Berkeley,
anymore; it stands on its own feet now.
Remove the "UCB" component from the RISC-V mainboards in the "emulation"
directory, and don't set MAINBOARD_VENDOR to UCB, either.
Change-Id: I301d9d0091a714e62375052e5af06a9197876688
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28951
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
... and fix them in the process.
The Kconfig help text seems to be a slightly better place for such
documentation than a comment in Kconfig.
Change-Id: I4114e17ad9c486a9de059040b0e2821540c31aad
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/23708
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I8919719865bc7ae8d13f025999caf8b5836b88ab
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/21656
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
It's already selected by SOC_UCB_RISCV.
Change-Id: Ic8a14300cdea2a4ab763b2746434891b72843604
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18390
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I4077739ac2be09107d8c5a3e4ae7ebd0da3cb876
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18147
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Almost all boards and chipsets within the codebase assume or
use SPI flash as the boot device. Therefore, provide an option
for the boards/chipsets which don't currently support SPI flash
as the boot device. The default is to assume SPI flash is the
boot device unless otherwise instructed. This falls in line
with the current assumptions, but it also allows one to
differentiate a platform desiring SPI flash support while it not
being the actual boot device.
One thing to note is that while google/daisy does boot with SPI
flash part no SPI API interfaces were ever implemented. Therefore,
mark that board as not having a SPI boot device.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:56151
Change-Id: Id4e0b4ec5e440e41421fbb6d0ca2be4185b62a6e
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/16191
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
This Kconfig is deprecated, new platforms need to locate
ramstage stack in CBMEM instead.
Change-Id: I20ece297302321337cc2ce17fdef0c55242a4fc3
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15189
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Since the HTIF is a non-standard interface, and coreboot already has a
8250 driver, I started implementing an 8250 core for spike[1].
[1]: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-sim/pull/53
Change-Id: I84adc1169474baa8cc5837358a8ad3d184cfa51b
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15150
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Spike support: QEMU RISCV is broken, and the maintainers at Berkeley
are working on it, but at the moment spike is the only way to test
on riscv. Add support for spike console output for debugging.
Privileged ISA: Update to privileged ISA in RISCV (machine,
supervisor, hypervisor, user modes) broke exisitng RISCV asm, and
bootblock.S was updated to match the new spec. Clean old assembly
[pg: things build with gcc 4.9 now, but don't expect them to work.
Hardcoding register names into the assembler language may not be the smartest
idea of the RISCV folks.]
Change-Id: Ie2c109d3c26712c207512f74f28ce1a925e6e181
Signed-off-by: Thaminda Edirisooriya <thaminda@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11078
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
