| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Change-Id: I8919719865bc7ae8d13f025999caf8b5836b88ab
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/21656
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
It's already selected by SOC_UCB_RISCV.
Change-Id: Ic8a14300cdea2a4ab763b2746434891b72843604
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18390
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I4077739ac2be09107d8c5a3e4ae7ebd0da3cb876
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18147
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Almost all boards and chipsets within the codebase assume or
use SPI flash as the boot device. Therefore, provide an option
for the boards/chipsets which don't currently support SPI flash
as the boot device. The default is to assume SPI flash is the
boot device unless otherwise instructed. This falls in line
with the current assumptions, but it also allows one to
differentiate a platform desiring SPI flash support while it not
being the actual boot device.
One thing to note is that while google/daisy does boot with SPI
flash part no SPI API interfaces were ever implemented. Therefore,
mark that board as not having a SPI boot device.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:56151
Change-Id: Id4e0b4ec5e440e41421fbb6d0ca2be4185b62a6e
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/16191
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
This Kconfig is deprecated, new platforms need to locate
ramstage stack in CBMEM instead.
Change-Id: I20ece297302321337cc2ce17fdef0c55242a4fc3
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15189
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Since the HTIF is a non-standard interface, and coreboot already has a
8250 driver, I started implementing an 8250 core for spike[1].
[1]: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-sim/pull/53
Change-Id: I84adc1169474baa8cc5837358a8ad3d184cfa51b
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15150
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Spike support: QEMU RISCV is broken, and the maintainers at Berkeley
are working on it, but at the moment spike is the only way to test
on riscv. Add support for spike console output for debugging.
Privileged ISA: Update to privileged ISA in RISCV (machine,
supervisor, hypervisor, user modes) broke exisitng RISCV asm, and
bootblock.S was updated to match the new spec. Clean old assembly
[pg: things build with gcc 4.9 now, but don't expect them to work.
Hardcoding register names into the assembler language may not be the smartest
idea of the RISCV folks.]
Change-Id: Ie2c109d3c26712c207512f74f28ce1a925e6e181
Signed-off-by: Thaminda Edirisooriya <thaminda@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11078
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
