| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This change switches all mainboard vendors and mainboards
to be autoincluded by Kconfig, rather than having to be mentioned
explicitly.
This means, vendor and mainboard directories are becoming more
"drop in", e.g. be placed in the coreboot directory hierarchy
without having to modify any higher level coreboot files.
The long term plan is to enable out of tree mainboards / components
to be built with a given coreboot version (given that the API did
not change)
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Change-Id: Ib68ce1478a2e12562aeac6297128a21eb174d58a
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9295
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Some SOCs (like pistachio, for instance) provide an 8250 compatible
UART, which has the same register layout, but mapped to a bus of a
different width.
Instead of adding a new driver for these controllers, it is better to
have coreboot report UART register width to libpayload, and have it
adjust the offsets accordingly when accessing the UART.
BRANCH=none
BUG=chrome-os-partner:31438
TEST=with the rest of the patches integrated depthcharge console messages
show up when running on the FPGA board
Change-Id: I30b742146069450941164afb04641b967a214d6d
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 2c30845f269ec6ae1d53ddc5cda0b4320008fa42
Original-Change-Id: Ia0a37cd5f24a1ee4d0334f8a7e3da5df0069cec4
Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/240027
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9738
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Non-x86 boards currently need to hardcode the position of their CBFS
master header in a Kconfig. This is very brittle because it is usually
put in between the bootblock and the first CBFS entry, without any
checks to guarantee that it won't overlap either of those. It is not fun
to debug random failures that move and disappear with tiny alignment
changes because someone decided to write "ORBC1112" over some part of
your data section (in a way that is not visible in the symbolized .elf
binaries, only in the final image). This patch seeks to prevent those
issues and reduce the need for manual configuration by making the image
layout a completely automated part of cbfstool.
Since automated placement of the CBFS header means we can no longer
hardcode its position into coreboot, this patch takes the existing x86
solution of placing a pointer to the header at the very end of the
CBFS-managed section of the ROM and generalizes it to all architectures.
This is now even possible with the read-only/read-write split in
ChromeOS, since coreboot knows how large that section is from the
CBFS_SIZE Kconfig (which is by default equal to ROM_SIZE, but can be
changed on systems that place other data next to coreboot/CBFS in ROM).
Also adds a feature to cbfstool that makes the -B (bootblock file name)
argument on image creation optional, since we have recently found valid
use cases for CBFS images that are not the first boot medium of the
device (instead opened by an earlier bootloader that can already
interpret CBFS) and therefore don't really need a bootblock.
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Built and booted on Veyron_Pinky, Nyan_Blaze and Falco.
Change-Id: Ib715bb8db258e602991b34f994750a2d3e2d5adf
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: e9879c0fbd57f105254c54bacb3e592acdcad35c
Original-Change-Id: Ifcc755326832755cfbccd6f0a12104cba28a20af
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/229975
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9620
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
This patch creates a new mechanism to define the static memory layout
(primarily in SRAM) for a given board, superseding the brittle mass of
Kconfigs that we were using before. The core part is a memlayout.ld file
in the mainboard directory (although boards are expected to just include
the SoC default in most cases), which is the primary linker script for
all stages (though not rmodules for now). It uses preprocessor macros
from <memlayout.h> to form a different valid linker script for all
stages while looking like a declarative, boilerplate-free map of memory
addresses to the programmer. Linker asserts will automatically guarantee
that the defined regions cannot overlap. Stages are defined with a
maximum size that will be enforced by the linker. The file serves to
both define and document the memory layout, so that the documentation
cannot go missing or out of date.
The mechanism is implemented for all boards in the ARM, ARM64 and MIPS
architectures, and should be extended onto all systems using SRAM in the
future. The CAR/XIP environment on x86 has very different requirements
and the layout is generally not as static, so it will stay like it is
and be unaffected by this patch (save for aligning some symbol names for
consistency and sharing the new common ramstage linker script include).
BUG=None
TEST=Booted normally and in recovery mode, checked suspend/resume and
the CBMEM console on Falco, Blaze (both normal and vboot2), Pinky and
Pit. Compiled Ryu, Storm and Urara, manually compared the disassemblies
with ToT and looked for red flags.
Change-Id: Ifd2276417f2036cbe9c056f17e42f051bcd20e81
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: f1e2028e7ebceeb2d71ff366150a37564595e614
Original-Change-Id: I005506add4e8fcdb74db6d5e6cb2d4cb1bd3cda5
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/213370
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9283
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@gmx.at>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
|
|
Instead of sprinkling the cbfs calls around (as well as getting
return values incorrect) use the common run_romstage() to perform
the necessary work to load and run romstage.
Change-Id: Id59f47febf5122cb3ee60f9741cfb58cb60ccab5
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8711
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Instead of sprinkling the cbfs calls around (as well as getting
return values incorrect) use the common run_ramstage() to perform
the necessary work to load and run ramstage.
Change-Id: I37b1e94be36ef7a43efe65b2db110742fa105169
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8710
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
This makes lzmadecode 64-bit clean (I hope).
It also cleans up a few other nits.
Change-Id: I24492e9f357e8d3a6de6abc351267f900eb4a19a
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7623
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Works in the RISCV version of QEMU.
Note that the lzmadecode is so unclean that it needs a lot of work.
A cleanup is in progress.
We decided in Prague to do this as one thing, because it forms a nice case study
of the bare minimum you need to add to get a new architecture going in qemu.
Change-Id: If5af15c3a70733d219973e0d032746f8ab027e4d
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7584
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
