summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/mainboard/emulation/qemu-power8/memlayout.ld
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-12-02cbfs: Enable CBFS mcache on most chipsetsJulius Werner
This patch flips the default of CONFIG_NO_CBFS_MCACHE so the feature is enabled by default. Some older chipsets with insufficient SRAM/CAR space still have it explicitly disabled. All others get the new section added to their memlayout... 8K seems like a sane default to start with. Change-Id: I0abd1c813aece6e78fb883f292ce6c9319545c44 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38424 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
2020-05-11treewide: Remove "this file is part of" linesPatrick Georgi
Stefan thinks they don't add value. Command used: sed -i -e '/file is part of /d' $(git grep "file is part of " |egrep ":( */\*.*\*/\$|#|;#|-- | *\* )" | cut -d: -f1 |grep -v crossgcc |grep -v gcov | grep -v /elf.h |grep -v nvramtool) The exceptions are for: - crossgcc (patch file) - gcov (imported from gcc) - elf.h (imported from GNU's libc) - nvramtool (more complicated header) The removed lines are: - fmt.Fprintln(f, "/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */") -# This file is part of a set of unofficial pre-commit hooks available -/* This file is part of coreboot */ -# This file is part of msrtool. -/* This file is part of msrtool. */ - * This file is part of ncurses, designed to be appended after curses.h.in -/* This file is part of pgtblgen. */ - * This file is part of the coreboot project. - /* This file is part of the coreboot project. */ -# This file is part of the coreboot project. -# This file is part of the coreboot project. -## This file is part of the coreboot project. --- This file is part of the coreboot project. -/* This file is part of the coreboot project */ -/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */ -;## This file is part of the coreboot project. -# This file is part of the coreboot project. It originated in the - * This file is part of the coreinfo project. -## This file is part of the coreinfo project. - * This file is part of the depthcharge project. -/* This file is part of the depthcharge project. */ -/* This file is part of the ectool project. */ - * This file is part of the GNU C Library. - * This file is part of the libpayload project. -## This file is part of the libpayload project. -/* This file is part of the Linux kernel. */ -## This file is part of the superiotool project. -/* This file is part of the superiotool project */ -/* This file is part of uio_usbdebug */ Change-Id: I82d872b3b337388c93d5f5bf704e9ee9e53ab3a9 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41194 Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-04-04mainboard/emulation: Use SPDX for GPL-2.0-only filesAngel Pons
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now. Change-Id: I68d2a8ac6f201f3c1131252b2b53b2b17ece1db6 Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40073 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
2020-03-18mainboard/[a-f]*: Remove copyright noticesPatrick Georgi
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example: - What's a "Copyright $year-present"? - Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current copyright holder? - People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even though they only deleted stuff - Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year, because why not? - Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"? - Or "Generated Code"? Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead and use the git history to deal with the rest. Change-Id: I57fc98788bb47df16d6aedd0f0701e9991801743 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39606 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com> Reviewed-by: Tristan Corrick <tristan@corrick.kiwi>
2019-12-11fmap: Make FMAP_CACHE mandatory if it is configured inJulius Werner
Now that we have a CONFIG_NO_FMAP_CACHE to completely configure out the pre-RAM FMAP cache code, there's no point in allowing the region to be optional anymore. This patch makes the section required by the linker. If a board doesn't want to provide it, it has to select NO_FMAP_CACHE. Adding FMAP_CACHE regions to a couple more targets that I think can use them but I don't know anything about... please yell if one of these is a bad idea and I should mark them NO_FMAP_CACHE instead. Change-Id: Ic7d47772ab3abfa7e3a66815c3739d0af071abc2 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37497 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
2016-04-04mainboard/emulation/qemu-power8: Use correct bootblock locationTimothy Pearson
Change-Id: Ia1e8f7c11708208638f83dc1058f1754e69d4d0c Signed-off-by: Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineeringinc.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14020 Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2016-02-20emulation/qemu-power8: initial mainboard and arch commitRonald G. Minnich
This builds and produces an image. The next step is to get a 'halt' instruction into the boot block and then attach with qemu. I can't get the powerpc64le-linux-gnu-ld.bfd to recognize any output arch but powerpc. That makes no sense to me. Change-Id: Ia2a5fe07a1457e7b6974ab1473539c7447d7a449 Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/13704 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>