| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Now that we have a CONFIG_NO_FMAP_CACHE to completely configure out the
pre-RAM FMAP cache code, there's no point in allowing the region to be
optional anymore. This patch makes the section required by the linker.
If a board doesn't want to provide it, it has to select NO_FMAP_CACHE.
Adding FMAP_CACHE regions to a couple more targets that I think can use
them but I don't know anything about... please yell if one of these is
a bad idea and I should mark them NO_FMAP_CACHE instead.
Change-Id: Ic7d47772ab3abfa7e3a66815c3739d0af071abc2
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37497
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
All ARM architecture boards are supposed to have a TTB region for their
page tables. ARM systems cannot use the data cache without enabling
paging, so it is imperative to do that as soon as possible. They will
also fault on unaligned accesses when not using the cache, which breaks
assumptions in CBFS code.
Unfortunately, we have some old boards in various stages of disrepair in
the tree that don't always follow these sorts of standard conventions.
It's not clear whether they actually boot anymore and if anyone still
has the respective hardware available to maintain them. I cannot really
fix and test them right now, but we should at least create a fake TTB
section for them so that common architecture code may make the correct
assumptions about which regions exist.
Change-Id: I51aa259fbb7a9c0ade72db905b1762c1c721f387
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25903
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Old map does not work on recent qemu. New map puts coreboot to ROM, so
it behave more like most real machines would.
For details on this map see comment in memlayout.ld
Change-Id: If1f3328b511daca32ba93da5a6d44402508b37e9
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/13748
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to
shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons
but because there are tools that look for them, and giving
them a standard pattern simplifies things.
However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update
every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a
new lease, but can drop the address instead.
util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that
we may want to synchronize every now and then.
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, *MA[, ]*02110-1301[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]*Suite 330, Boston, MA *02111-1307[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f
-a \! -name \*.patch \
-a \! -name \*_shipped \
-a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \
-a \! -name LGPL.txt \
-a \! -name COPYING \
-a \! -name DISCLAIMER \
-exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch creates a new mechanism to define the static memory layout
(primarily in SRAM) for a given board, superseding the brittle mass of
Kconfigs that we were using before. The core part is a memlayout.ld file
in the mainboard directory (although boards are expected to just include
the SoC default in most cases), which is the primary linker script for
all stages (though not rmodules for now). It uses preprocessor macros
from <memlayout.h> to form a different valid linker script for all
stages while looking like a declarative, boilerplate-free map of memory
addresses to the programmer. Linker asserts will automatically guarantee
that the defined regions cannot overlap. Stages are defined with a
maximum size that will be enforced by the linker. The file serves to
both define and document the memory layout, so that the documentation
cannot go missing or out of date.
The mechanism is implemented for all boards in the ARM, ARM64 and MIPS
architectures, and should be extended onto all systems using SRAM in the
future. The CAR/XIP environment on x86 has very different requirements
and the layout is generally not as static, so it will stay like it is
and be unaffected by this patch (save for aligning some symbol names for
consistency and sharing the new common ramstage linker script include).
BUG=None
TEST=Booted normally and in recovery mode, checked suspend/resume and
the CBMEM console on Falco, Blaze (both normal and vboot2), Pinky and
Pit. Compiled Ryu, Storm and Urara, manually compared the disassemblies
with ToT and looked for red flags.
Change-Id: Ifd2276417f2036cbe9c056f17e42f051bcd20e81
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: f1e2028e7ebceeb2d71ff366150a37564595e614
Original-Change-Id: I005506add4e8fcdb74db6d5e6cb2d4cb1bd3cda5
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/213370
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9283
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@gmx.at>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
|
