Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I57fc98788bb47df16d6aedd0f0701e9991801743
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39606
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-by: Tristan Corrick <tristan@corrick.kiwi>
|
|
Linux expects a working PSCI and hangs if not found.
Add BL31 into CBFS as '-M virt,secure=on -bios ' commands line arguments cause
qemu's internal PSCI emulation to shutdown.
BL31 is placed in qemu's SECURERAM memory region and won't conflict with
resources in DRAM.
Tested on qemu-system-aarch64:
Fixes a hang and allows to boot into Linux 5.4.14 userspace.
Change-Id: I809742522240185431621cc4fd8b9c7deaf2bb54
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38535
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
|
|
Enable MMU in bootblock. Makes qemu look more similar to real hardware.
There's no real need to activate the MMU.
Tested on qemu-system-aarch64: 5 page entries are used out of 32.
Change-Id: Ifaed9d3cc11520f180a732d51adce634621b5844
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38534
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Now that we have a CONFIG_NO_FMAP_CACHE to completely configure out the
pre-RAM FMAP cache code, there's no point in allowing the region to be
optional anymore. This patch makes the section required by the linker.
If a board doesn't want to provide it, it has to select NO_FMAP_CACHE.
Adding FMAP_CACHE regions to a couple more targets that I think can use
them but I don't know anything about... please yell if one of these is
a bad idea and I should mark them NO_FMAP_CACHE instead.
Change-Id: Ic7d47772ab3abfa7e3a66815c3739d0af071abc2
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37497
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
Kconfig became stricter on what it accepts, so accomodate before
updating to a new release.
Change-Id: I92a9e9bf0d557a7532ba533cd7776c48f2488f91
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37156
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
This solution is very generic and can in principle be implemented on
all arch/soc. Currently the old infrastructure to pass on information
from romstage to ramstage is left in place and will be removed in a
follow-up commit.
Nvidia Tegra will be handled in a separate patch because it has a
custom ramstage entry.
Instead trying to figure out which files can be removed from stages
and which cbmem_top implementations need with preprocessor, rename all
cbmem_top implementation to cbmem_top_romstage.
Mechanisms set in place to pass on information from rom- to ram-stage
will be replaced in a followup commit.
Change-Id: I86cdc5c2fac76797732a3a3398f50c4d1ff6647a
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36275
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
This adds a common cbmem_top implementation to all coreboot target.
In romstage a static variable will be used to cache the result of
cbmem_top_romstage.
In ramstage if CONFIG_RAMSTAGE_CBMEM_TOP_ARG is set a global variable
needs to be populated by the stage entry with the value passed via the
calling arguments. if CONFIG_RAMSTAGE_CBMEM_TOP_ARG is not set the
same implementation as will be used as in romstage.
Change-Id: Ie767542ee25483acc9a56785ce20a885e9a63098
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36273
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
DRAM_SIZE_MB should be the maximum size (255GiB / -m 261120M)
that’s possible with QEMU on AArch64 virt because it tries to search
the DRAM_SIZE_MB range to find the true memory size.
Signed-off-by: Asami Doi <d0iasm.pub@gmail.com>
Change-Id: Id479c0b18d1e1adceecdcca13e36119b95617e6d
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35024
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
This CL adds a new board, QEMU/AArch64, for ARMv8. The machine supported
is virt which is a QEMU 2.8 ARM virtual machine. The default CPU of
qemu-system-aarch64 is Cortex-a15, so you need to specify a 64-bit cpu
via a flag.
To execute:
$ qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt,secure=on,virtualization=on \
-cpu cortex-a53 -bios build/coreboot.rom -m 8192M -nographic
Change-Id: Id7c0831b1ecf08785b4ec8139d809bad9b3e1eec
Signed-off-by: Asami Doi <d0iasm.pub@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33387
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|