| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This patch renames cbfs_boot_map_with_leak() and cbfs_boot_load_file()
to cbfs_map() and cbfs_load() respectively. This is supposed to be the
start of a new, better organized CBFS API where the most common
operations have the most simple and straight-forward names. Less
commonly used variants of these operations (e.g. cbfs_ro_load() or
cbfs_region_load()) can be introduced later. It seems unnecessary to
keep carrying around "boot" in the names of most CBFS APIs if the vast
majority of accesses go to the boot CBFS (instead, more unusual
operations should have longer names that describe how they diverge from
the common ones).
cbfs_map() is paired with a new cbfs_unmap() to allow callers to cleanly
reap mappings when desired. A few new cbfs_unmap() calls are added to
generic code where it makes sense, but it seems unnecessary to introduce
this everywhere in platform or architecture specific code where the boot
medium is known to be memory-mapped anyway. In fact, even for
non-memory-mapped platforms, sometimes leaking a mapping to the CBFS
cache is a much cleaner solution than jumping through hoops to provide
some other storage for some long-lived file object, and it shouldn't be
outright forbidden when it makes sense.
Additionally, remove the type arguments from these function signatures.
The goal is to eventually remove type arguments for lookup from the
whole CBFS API. Filenames already uniquely identify CBFS files. The type
field is just informational, and there should be APIs to allow callers
to check it when desired, but it's not clear what we gain from forcing
this as a parameter into every single CBFS access when the vast majority
of the time it provides no additional value and is just clutter.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ib24325400815a9c3d25f66c61829a24a239bb88e
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39304
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com>
Reviewed-by: Mariusz Szafrański <mariuszx.szafranski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I4077b9dfeeb2a9126c35bbdd3d14c52e55a5e87c
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/45404
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Coverity detects uninitialized variables through PASS_BY_REFERENCE
usage. Fix this issue by initializing variables before their uage.
Found-by: Coverity CID 1429765, 1429772, 1429780
TEST=None
Signed-off-by: John Zhao <john.zhao@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ie583b072a76949fb3f17c1271a6427ee942db0ce
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/45611
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michał Żygowski <michal.zygowski@3mdeb.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I3d0ca401cf5268962bcd9074f94c37724cc0a836
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/45250
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
|
|
Found using:
diff <(git grep -l '#include <string.h>' -- src/) <(git grep -l 'STRINGIFY\|memcpy\|memmove\|memset\|memcmp\|memchr\|strdup\|strconcat\|strnlen\|strlen\|strchr\|strncpy\|strcpy\|strcmp\|strncmp\|strspn\|strcspn\|strtok_r\|strtok\|atol\|strrchr\|skip_atoi\|snprintf' -- src/) |grep -v vendorcode |grep '<'
Change-Id: I12802d0a6254b2fa39d59f485008bb2012f7b32d
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41913
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Based on the autoport. The OptiPlex 9010 comes in four different sizes:
MT, DT, SFF and USFF. Tested on SFF only. The other PCBs are slightly
different, but they are designed with intercompatibility in mind. With
small devicetree overrides it should work on OptiPlex 7010 and other
OptiPlex 9010 variants as well.
Signed-off-by: Michał Żygowski <michal.zygowski@3mdeb.com>
Change-Id: I88d65cae30d08ca727d86d930707c2be25a527cf
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40351
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
