Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Two GPIOs were set as SCI, but are not GEvent capable pins on morgana.
Signed-off-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I00dc1b2595c047ce6898b394061d119ac8680755
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/70282
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
Configure birman GPIOs per schematic 105-D67000-00B v0.7
Signed-off-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I5459efb38431e568e25405c440b5b9cf1354f02f
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/69411
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
Now that we have a common init_tables in all mainboards using AMD SoCs,
both the population of the fch_pic_routing and fch_apic_routing arrays
and the definition of those arrays can be moved to the common AMD SoC
code to not have the code duplicated in all mainboards.
BUG=b:182782749
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Suggested-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I8c65eca258272f0ef7dec3ece6236f5d00954c66
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/68853
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Birman should work with either Morgana or Glinda SoCs, so configure the
mainboard to allow building with either.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I56206cd9ad5db99c00b734430b250e04ea9e0609
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/68932
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk@gmail.com>
|
|
This ports the changes to the way the fch_pic_routing and
fch_apic_routing arrays get populated from Mandolin to Bilby, Birman,
Chausie and Majolica. This is a preparation to move the init_tables
implementation to the common AMD SoC code in a later patch.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ia957056b60dafbc52a9809a4563a348ad7443376
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/68849
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
|
|
Use the same fch_irq_map name in all mainboards using the Picasso,
Cezanne, Mendocino and Morgana instead of using a mainboard-specific
name.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I035cffb9c6c8afd6bd115831e8eed4a395e2a7fc
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/68846
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
|
|
Instead of using magic constants for the fch_pic_routing and
fch_apic_routing array sizes, define FCH_IRQ_ROUTING_ENTRIES in the
common code headers and use this definition. This also allows to drop
the static assert for the array sizes. In the Stoneyridge mainboard code
the equivalent arrays are named mainboard_picr_data and
mainboard_intr_data; also use FCH_IRQ_ROUTING_ENTRIES as fixed array
size there.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I2d7ee46bd013ce413189398a144e46ceac0c2a10
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/68818
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Define the fch_irq_routing struct once in a common header file instead
of in every mainboard's code.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I11d9000b6ed7529e4afd7f6e8a7332c390da6dab
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/68817
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
birman is the reference board for the morgana SoC. It needs to be
updated to match the actual board design as well.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Change-Id: I4b16854c954949217a76c3d4f04ddc4001f64337
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/68196
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|