coreboot.git - my copy of coreboot

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2013-07-10	Rename hardwaremain() to main()	Stefan Reinauer
	... and drop the wrapper on ARMv7 Change-Id: If3ffe953cee9e61d4dcbb38f4e5e2ca74b628ccc Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3639 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-01-22	src/lib/timestamp.c: Fix spelling of timestamp	Paul Menzel
	Change-Id: I96d41882c92e577ce816264c493376d2f2d950f6 Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2181 Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2012-11-13	Add method for delaying adding of timestamps	Stefan Reinauer
	In hardwaremain() we can't add timestamps before we actually reinitialized the cbmem area. Hence we kept the timestamps in an array and added them later. This is ugly and intrusive and helped hiding a bug that prevented any timestamps to be logged in hardwaremain() when coming out of an S3 resume. The problem is solved by moving the logic to keep a few timestamps around into the timestamp code. This also gets rid of a lot of ugly ifdefs in hardwaremain.c Change-Id: I945fc4c77e990f620c18cbd054ccd87e746706ef Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1785 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-03-28	Add timestamp collecting to coreboot.	Vadim Bendebury
	This patch adds code to initialize the time stamp collection facility in coreboot. It adds a table in the CBMEM section, which provides the base timer reading value (all other readings are offsets of this one) and an array of timestamp id/timestamp value pairs. Just two values are being added now, this will have to be used more extensively and also integrated into payloads to provide more comprehensive boot process time measurements. Also, since the CBMEM area could already contain a section (from the previous run, before reset), when processing a section addition request we should check if a section already exists and return its address, if so. Change-Id: I7ed9f5c400bc5432f228348b41fd19a67c36d533 Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/713 Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)