| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Change-Id: I46a362270f69d0a4a28e5bb9c954f34d632815ff
Signed-off-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/81455
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
When <symbols.h> was first introduced, it only declared a handful of
regions and we didn't expect that too many architectures and platforms
would need to add their own later. However, our amount of platforms has
greatly expanded since, and with them the need for more special memory
regions. The amount of code duplication is starting to get unsightly,
and platforms keep defining their own <soc/symbols.h> files that need
this as well.
This patch adds another macro to cut down the definition boilerplate.
Unfortunately, macros cannot define other macros when they're called, so
referring to region sizes as _name_size doesn't work anymore. This patch
replaces the scheme with REGION_SIZE(name).
Not touching the regions in the x86-specific <arch/symbols.h> yet since
they don't follow the standard _region/_eregion naming scheme. They can
be converted later if desired.
Change-Id: I44727d77d1de75882c72a94f29bd7e2c27741dd8
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31539
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I6c77f4289b46646872731ef9c20dc115f0cf876d
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29161
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Fix the following warning detected by checkpatch.pl:
WARNING: line over 80 characters
TEST=Build and run on Galileo Gen2
Change-Id: I5fa3f8e950e2f0c60bd0e8f030342dc8c0469299
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18758
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
Fix the following errors and warnings detected by checkpatch.pl:
ERROR: spaces required around that '?' (ctx:WxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that '=' (ctx:VxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that '<' (ctx:VxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that '+=' (ctx:VxV)
ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
ERROR: space required before the open brace '{'
ERROR: space required after that close brace '}'
ERROR: need consistent spacing around '+' (ctx:WxV)
ERROR: need consistent spacing around '*' (ctx:WxV)
ERROR: need consistent spacing around '&' (ctx:VxW)
ERROR: spaces required around that '?' (ctx:VxW)
ERROR: spaces required around that ':' (ctx:VxW)
ERROR: trailing whitespace
ERROR: space prohibited before that '++' (ctx:WxO)
ERROR: space prohibited before that ',' (ctx:WxW)
ERROR: space prohibited after that '!' (ctx:BxW)
ERROR: spaces prohibited around that '->' (ctx:VxW)
ERROR: space prohibited after that '-' (ctx:WxW)
WARNING: space prohibited before semicolon
WARNING: unnecessary whitespace before a quoted newline
WARNING: missing space after return type
Note that lib/libgcov.c and lib/lzmadecode.c are providing false
positives for ERROR: need consistent spacing around '*' (ctx:WxV)
An example is:
void __gcov_merge_add(gcov_type *counters __attribute__ ((unused)),
unsigned int n_counters __attribute__ ((unused))) {}
TEST=Build and run on Galileo Gen2
Change-Id: I0016327a5754018eaeb25bedf42338291632c7c1
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18733
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
Fix the following error detected by checkpatch.pl:
ERROR: space required before the open parenthesis '('
TEST=Build and run on Galileo Gen2
Change-Id: I8953fecbe75136ff989c9e3cf6c5e155dcee3c3b
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18698
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philippe.mathieu.daude@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
|
|
Change-Id: I9a59fcb7cf221ae590a047c520e7aff99e23ecf1
Signed-off-by: Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11962
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
checkstack() runs at the end of ramstage to warn about stack overflows,
and it assumes that CONFIG_STACK_SIZE is always the size of the stack to
check. This is only true for systems that bring up multiprocessing in
ramstage and assign a separate stack for each core, like x86 and ARM64.
Other architectures like ARM and MIPS (for now) don't touch secondary
CPUs at all and currently don't look like they'll ever need to, so they
generally stay on the same (SRAM-based) stack they have been on since
their bootblock.
This patch tries to model that difference by making these architectures
explicitly set CONFIG_STACK_SIZE to zero, and using that as a cue to
assume the whole (_estack - _stack) area in checkstack() instead. Also
adds a BUG() to the stack overflow check, since that is currently just
as non-fatal as the BIOS_ERR message (despite the incorrect "SYSTEM
HALTED" output) but a little more easy to spot. Such a serious failure
should not drown out in all the normal random pieces of lower case boot
spam (also, I was intending to eventually have a look at assert() and
BUG() to hopefully make them a little more useful/noticeable if I ever
find the time for it).
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Booted Pinky, noticed it no longer complains about stack overflows.
Built Falco, Ryu and Urara.
Change-Id: I6826e0ec24201d4d83c5929b281828917bc9abf4
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 54229a725e8907b84a105c04ecea33b8f9b91dd4
Original-Change-Id: I49f70bb7ad192bd1c48e077802085dc5ecbfd58b
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/235894
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9610
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Print a space after a full stop.
Change-Id: Ic7d0522ae35079b64ce61956d06ea59843ef9d80
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/176756
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit c7ff63038b6888b17a96783b1169c5f335022b24)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6878
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
|
|
The order of some printk arguments were reversed.
Change-Id: I5e8f70b79050b92ebe8cfa5aae94b6cd1a5fd547
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2364
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Several small improvements of the stack checking code:
- move the CPU0 stack check right before jumping to the payload
and out of hardwaremain (that file is too crowded anyways)
- fix prototype in lib.h
- print size of used stack
- use checkstack function both on CPU0 and CPU1-x
- print amount of stack used per core
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Test: Boot coreboot on Link, see the following output:
...
CPU1: stack: 00156000 - 00157000, lowest used address 00156c68,
stack used: 920 bytes
CPU2: stack: 00155000 - 00156000, lowest used address 00155c68,
stack used: 920 bytes
CPU3: stack: 00154000 - 00155000, lowest used address 00154c68,
stack used: 920 bytes
...
Jumping to boot code at 1110008
CPU0: stack: 00157000 - 00158000, lowest used address 00157af8,
stack used: 1288 bytes
Change-Id: I7b83eeee0186559a0a62daa12e3f7782990fd2df
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1787
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Previous patches implemented stack overflow checking for the APs.
This patch builds on the BSP stack poisoning patch to implement
stack overflow checking for the BSP, and also prints out maximum
stack usage. It reveals that our 32K stack is ridiculously oversized,
especially now that the lzma decoder doesn't use a giant 16K on-stack
array.
Break the stack checking out into a separate function, which
we will later use for the APs.
CPU0: stack from 00180000 to 00188000:Lowest stack address 00187ad8
To test failure, change the DEADBEEF stack poison value in c_start.S
to something else. Then we should get an error like this:
Stack overrun on BSP.Increase stack from current 32768 bytes
CPU0: stack from 00180000 to 00188000:Lowest stack address 00180000
Separate the act of loading from the act of starting the payload. This
allows us better error management and reporting of stack use. Now we
see:
CPU0: stack from 00180000 to 00188000:Lowest stack address 00187ad8
Tested for both success and failure on Link. At the same time, feel free
to carefully check my manipulation of _estack.
Change-Id: Ibb09738b15ec6a5510ac81e45dd82756bfa5aac2
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1286
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
