| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
checkstack() runs at the end of ramstage to warn about stack overflows,
and it assumes that CONFIG_STACK_SIZE is always the size of the stack to
check. This is only true for systems that bring up multiprocessing in
ramstage and assign a separate stack for each core, like x86 and ARM64.
Other architectures like ARM and MIPS (for now) don't touch secondary
CPUs at all and currently don't look like they'll ever need to, so they
generally stay on the same (SRAM-based) stack they have been on since
their bootblock.
This patch tries to model that difference by making these architectures
explicitly set CONFIG_STACK_SIZE to zero, and using that as a cue to
assume the whole (_estack - _stack) area in checkstack() instead. Also
adds a BUG() to the stack overflow check, since that is currently just
as non-fatal as the BIOS_ERR message (despite the incorrect "SYSTEM
HALTED" output) but a little more easy to spot. Such a serious failure
should not drown out in all the normal random pieces of lower case boot
spam (also, I was intending to eventually have a look at assert() and
BUG() to hopefully make them a little more useful/noticeable if I ever
find the time for it).
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Booted Pinky, noticed it no longer complains about stack overflows.
Built Falco, Ryu and Urara.
Change-Id: I6826e0ec24201d4d83c5929b281828917bc9abf4
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 54229a725e8907b84a105c04ecea33b8f9b91dd4
Original-Change-Id: I49f70bb7ad192bd1c48e077802085dc5ecbfd58b
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/235894
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9610
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Print a space after a full stop.
Change-Id: Ic7d0522ae35079b64ce61956d06ea59843ef9d80
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/176756
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit c7ff63038b6888b17a96783b1169c5f335022b24)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6878
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
|
|
The order of some printk arguments were reversed.
Change-Id: I5e8f70b79050b92ebe8cfa5aae94b6cd1a5fd547
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2364
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Several small improvements of the stack checking code:
- move the CPU0 stack check right before jumping to the payload
and out of hardwaremain (that file is too crowded anyways)
- fix prototype in lib.h
- print size of used stack
- use checkstack function both on CPU0 and CPU1-x
- print amount of stack used per core
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Test: Boot coreboot on Link, see the following output:
...
CPU1: stack: 00156000 - 00157000, lowest used address 00156c68,
stack used: 920 bytes
CPU2: stack: 00155000 - 00156000, lowest used address 00155c68,
stack used: 920 bytes
CPU3: stack: 00154000 - 00155000, lowest used address 00154c68,
stack used: 920 bytes
...
Jumping to boot code at 1110008
CPU0: stack: 00157000 - 00158000, lowest used address 00157af8,
stack used: 1288 bytes
Change-Id: I7b83eeee0186559a0a62daa12e3f7782990fd2df
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1787
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Previous patches implemented stack overflow checking for the APs.
This patch builds on the BSP stack poisoning patch to implement
stack overflow checking for the BSP, and also prints out maximum
stack usage. It reveals that our 32K stack is ridiculously oversized,
especially now that the lzma decoder doesn't use a giant 16K on-stack
array.
Break the stack checking out into a separate function, which
we will later use for the APs.
CPU0: stack from 00180000 to 00188000:Lowest stack address 00187ad8
To test failure, change the DEADBEEF stack poison value in c_start.S
to something else. Then we should get an error like this:
Stack overrun on BSP.Increase stack from current 32768 bytes
CPU0: stack from 00180000 to 00188000:Lowest stack address 00180000
Separate the act of loading from the act of starting the payload. This
allows us better error management and reporting of stack use. Now we
see:
CPU0: stack from 00180000 to 00188000:Lowest stack address 00187ad8
Tested for both success and failure on Link. At the same time, feel free
to carefully check my manipulation of _estack.
Change-Id: Ibb09738b15ec6a5510ac81e45dd82756bfa5aac2
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1286
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
