| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I89b10076e0f4a4b3acd59160fb7abe349b228321
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39611
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
This patch is a raw application of
find src/ -type f | xargs sed -i -e 's/IS_ENABLED\s*(CONFIG_/CONFIG(/g'
Change-Id: I6262d6d5c23cabe23c242b4f38d446b74fe16b88
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31774
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Move soft_reset() to `southbridge/amd/common/` it's only used for
amdfam10 now.
Drop hard_reset() for good.
Change-Id: Ifdc5791160653c5578007f6c1b96015efe2b3e1e
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29059
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Make use of the common CF9 reset in SOC_INTEL_COMMON_RESET. Also
implement board_reset() as a "full reset" (aka. cold reset) as that
is what was used here for hard_reset().
Drop soc_reset_prepare() thereby, as it was only used for APL. Also,
move the global-reset logic.
We leave some comments to remind us that a system_reset() should
be enough, where a full_reset() is called now (to retain current
behaviour) and looks suspicious.
Note, as no global_reset() is implemented for Denverton-NS, we halt
there now instead of issuing a non-global reset. This seems safer;
a non-global reset might result in a reset loop.
Change-Id: I5e7025c3c9ea6ded18e72037412b60a1df31bd53
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29169
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
board_reset() replaces the existing common reset API. There is no common
distinction between reset types across platforms, hence, common code
could never decide which one to call.
Currently only hard_reset() is used by common code. We replace these
calls and provide a fall-back to the current hard_reset() implemen-
tation. The fall-back will be removed along with hard_reset() after the
transition of all boards.
Change-Id: I274a8cee9cb38226b5a0bdff6a847c74ef0b3128
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29047
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Its spreading copies got out of sync. And as it is not a standard header
but used in commonlib code, it belongs into commonlib. While we are at
it, always include it via GCC's `-include` switch.
Some Windows and BSD quirk handling went into the util copies. We always
guard from redefinitions now to prevent further issues.
Change-Id: I850414e6db1d799dce71ff2dc044e6a000ad2552
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28927
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Add a __noreturn macro that wraps __attribute__((noreturn)) and replace
current users with the macro.
Change-Id: Iddd0728cf79678c3d1c1f7e7946c27375a644a7d
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28505
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Instead of writing out '__attribute__((weak))' use a shorter form.
Change-Id: If418a1d55052780077febd2d8f2089021f414b91
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25767
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Justin TerAvest <teravest@chromium.org>
|
|
There are many good reasons why we may want to run some sort of generic
callback before we're executing a reset. Unfortunateley, that is really
hard right now: code that wants to reset simply calls the hard_reset()
function (or one of its ill-differentiated cousins) which is directly
implemented by a myriad of different mainboards, northbridges, SoCs,
etc. More recent x86 SoCs have tried to solve the problem in their own
little corner of soc/intel/common, but it's really something that would
benefit all of coreboot.
This patch expands the concept onto all boards: hard_reset() and friends
get implemented in a generic location where they can run hooks before
calling the platform-specific implementation that is now called
do_hard_reset(). The existing Intel reset_prepare() gets generalized as
soc_reset_prepare() (and other hooks for arch, mainboard, etc. can now
easily be added later if necessary). We will also use this central point
to ensure all platforms flush their cache before reset, which is
generally useful for all cases where we're trying to persist information
in RAM across reboots (like the new persistent CBMEM console does).
Also remove cpu_reset() completely since it's not used anywhere and
doesn't seem very useful compared to the others.
Change-Id: I41b89ce4a923102f0748922496e1dd9bce8a610f
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19789
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
