| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Clean whitespace errors that have gotten past lint-stable-003-whitespace
and gerrit review.
Change-Id: Id76fc68e9d32d1b2b672d519b75cdc80cc4f1ad9
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3920
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Bruce Griffith <Bruce.Griffith@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I999987af9cb44906e3c3135c0351a0cd6eb210ff
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3756
Reviewed-by: Dave Frodin <dave.frodin@se-eng.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
.. to reflect the recent changes w.r.t avoiding
trouble with the coreboot pre-commit hooks.
and fix two whitespace errors.
Change-Id: I6c94e95dd439940cf3b44231c8aab5126e9d45c7
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2158
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com>
|
|
Make the comments match what pre-commit-hook wants.
Change-Id: Ib99a6583f97221df3638bd3b7723f51d5f9c223c
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2143
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
In order to provide some insight on what code is executed during
coreboot's run time and how well our test scenarios work, this
adds code coverage support to coreboot's ram stage. This should
be easily adaptable for payloads, and maybe even romstage.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html for
more information.
To instrument coreboot, select CONFIG_COVERAGE ("Code coverage
support") in Kconfig, and recompile coreboot. coreboot will then
store its code coverage information into CBMEM, if possible.
Then, run "cbmem -CV" as root on the target system running the
instrumented coreboot binary. This will create a whole bunch of
.gcda files that contain coverage information. Tar them up, copy
them to your build system machine, and untar them. Then you can
use your favorite coverage utility (gcov, lcov, ...) to visualize
code coverage.
For a sneak peak of what will expect you, please take a look
at http://www.coreboot.org/~stepan/coreboot-coverage/
Change-Id: Ib287d8309878a1f5c4be770c38b1bc0bb3aa6ec7
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2052
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
