summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/lib/libgcc.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-02-13riscv: Add initial support for 32bit boardsPhilipp Hug
* Adding separate targets for 32bit and 64bit qemu * Using the riscv64 toolchain for 32bit builds requires setting -m elf32lriscv * rv32/rv64 is currently configured with ARCH_RISCV_RV32/RV64 and not per stage. This should probably be changed later. TEST=Boots to "Payload not loaded." on 32bit qemu using the following commands: util/riscv/make-spike-elf.sh build/coreboot.rom build/coreboot.elf qemu-system-riscv32 -M virt -m 1024M -nographic -kernel build/coreboot.elf Change-Id: I35e59b459d1770df10b51fe9e77dcc474d7c75a0 Signed-off-by: Philipp Hug <philipp@hug.cx> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31253 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2019-01-17lib/libgcc.c: Fix shift warningsPaul Menzel
``` if (!(a & (0xffff << 16))) { ^~ src/lib/libgcc.c:40:18: error: result of '255 << 24' requires 33 bits to represent, but 'int' only has 32 bits [-Werror=shift-overflow=] if (!(a & (0xff << 24))) { ^~ src/lib/libgcc.c:45:17: error: result of '15 << 28' requires 33 bits to represent, but 'int' only has 32 bits [-Werror=shift-overflow=] if (!(a & (0xf << 28))) { ^~ ``` Change-Id: I7bdd75c20a76b303743d7e7e0d3a6503760284fd Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/23361 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
2015-10-31tree: drop last paragraph of GPL copyright headerPatrick Georgi
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address. Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we imported) looks out for that. This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further editing. Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2015-06-05lib: Unify log2() and related functionsJulius Werner
This patch adds a few bit counting functions that are commonly needed for certain register calculations. We previously had a log2() implementation already, but it was awkwardly split between some C code that's only available in ramstage and an optimized x86-specific implementation in pre-RAM that prevented other archs from pulling it into earlier stages. Using __builtin_clz() as the baseline allows GCC to inline optimized assembly for most archs (including CLZ on ARM/ARM64 and BSR on x86), and to perform constant-folding if possible. What was previously named log2f on pre-RAM x86 is now ffs, since that's the standard name for that operation and I honestly don't have the slightest idea how it could've ever ended up being called log2f (which in POSIX is 'binary(2) LOGarithm with Float result, whereas the Find First Set operation has no direct correlation to logarithms that I know of). Make ffs result 0-based instead of the POSIX standard's 1-based since that is consistent with clz, log2 and the former log2f, and generally closer to what you want for most applications (a value that can directly be used as a shift to reach the found bit). Call it __ffs() instead of ffs() to avoid problems when importing code, since that's what Linux uses for the 0-based operation. CQ-DEPEND=CL:273023 BRANCH=None BUG=None TEST=Built on Big, Falco, Jerry, Oak and Urara. Compared old and new log2() and __ffs() results on Falco for a bunch of test values. Change-Id: I599209b342059e17b3130621edb6b6bbeae26876 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 3701a16ae944ecff9c54fa9a50d28015690fcb2f Original-Change-Id: I60f7cf893792508188fa04d088401a8bca4b4af6 Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/273008 Original-Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10394 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>