| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Fix the following errors and warnings detected by checkpatch.pl:
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
ERROR: switch and case should be at the same indent
WARNING: Statements should start on a tabstop
WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
WARNING: please, no space before tabs
WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements
WARNING: labels should not be indented
TEST=Build and run on Galileo Gen2
Change-Id: Iebcff26ad41ab6eb0027b871a1c06f3b52dd207c
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18732
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
Fix the following warning detected by checkpatch.pl:
WARNING: space prohibited between function name and open parenthesis '('
TEST=Build and run on Galileo Gen2
Change-Id: I8f3c79302dc5eb1861ffb245617a27addf8653ef
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18731
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
Fix the following warning detected by checkpatch.pl:
WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
The remaining 37 warnings in gcov-io.c and libgcov.c are all false
positives generated by checkpatch detecting a symbol or function name
ending in _unsigned.
TEST=Build and run on Galileo Gen2
Change-Id: I9f1b71993caca8b3eb3f643525534a937d365ab3
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18695
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philippe.mathieu.daude@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
In order to provide some insight on what code is executed during
coreboot's run time and how well our test scenarios work, this
adds code coverage support to coreboot's ram stage. This should
be easily adaptable for payloads, and maybe even romstage.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html for
more information.
To instrument coreboot, select CONFIG_COVERAGE ("Code coverage
support") in Kconfig, and recompile coreboot. coreboot will then
store its code coverage information into CBMEM, if possible.
Then, run "cbmem -CV" as root on the target system running the
instrumented coreboot binary. This will create a whole bunch of
.gcda files that contain coverage information. Tar them up, copy
them to your build system machine, and untar them. Then you can
use your favorite coverage utility (gcov, lcov, ...) to visualize
code coverage.
For a sneak peak of what will expect you, please take a look
at http://www.coreboot.org/~stepan/coreboot-coverage/
Change-Id: Ib287d8309878a1f5c4be770c38b1bc0bb3aa6ec7
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2052
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
