coreboot.git - my copy of coreboot

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2015-05-21	Remove address from GPLv2 headers	Patrick Georgi
	As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons but because there are tools that look for them, and giving them a standard pattern simplifies things. However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a new lease, but can drop the address instead. util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that we may want to synchronize every now and then. $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA[, ]02110-1301[, ]USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307[, ]USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -a \! -name \.patch \ -a \! -name \_shipped \ -a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \ -a \! -name LGPL.txt \ -a \! -name COPYING \ -a \! -name DISCLAIMER \ -exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
2015-03-18	bootstate: use structure pointers for scheduling callbacks	Aaron Durbin
	The GCC 4.9.2 update showed that the boot_state_init_entry structures were being padded and assumed to be aligned in to an increased size. The bootstate scheduler for static entries, boot_state_schedule_static_entries(), was then calculating the wrong values within the array. To fix this just use a pointer to the boot_state_init_entry structure that needs to be scheduled. In addition to the previous issue noted above, the .bs_init section was sitting in the read only portion of the image while the fields within it need to be writable. Also, the boot_state_schedule_static_entries() was using symbol comparison to terminate a loop which in C can lead the compiler to always evaluate the loop at least once since the language spec indicates no 2 symbols can be the same value. Change-Id: I6dc5331c2979d508dde3cd5c3332903d40d8048b Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8699 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2013-05-01	coverage: use boot state callbacks	Aaron Durbin
	Utilize the static boot state callback scheduling to initialize and tear down the coverage infrastructure at the appropriate points. The coverage initialization is performed at BS_PRE_DEVICE which is the earliest point a callback can be called. The tear down occurs at the 2 exit points of ramstage: OS resume and payload boot. Change-Id: Ie5ee51268e1f473f98fa517710a266e38dc01b6d Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3135 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-04-08	Fix compilation when coverage debugging is enabled	Stefan Reinauer
	With CONFIG_DEBUG_COVERAGE enabled, the build currently fails with src/lib/gcov-glue.c: In function 'fseek': src/lib/gcov-glue.c:87:2: error: format '%d' expects argument of type 'int', but argument 4 has type 'long int' [-Werror=format] src/lib/gcov-glue.c:87:2: error: format '%d' expects argument of type 'int', but argument 4 has type 'long int' [-Werror=format] Change-Id: Iddaa601748c210d9dad06ae9dab2a3deaa635b2c Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3032 Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-01-12	Implement GCC code coverage analysis	Stefan Reinauer
	In order to provide some insight on what code is executed during coreboot's run time and how well our test scenarios work, this adds code coverage support to coreboot's ram stage. This should be easily adaptable for payloads, and maybe even romstage. See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html for more information. To instrument coreboot, select CONFIG_COVERAGE ("Code coverage support") in Kconfig, and recompile coreboot. coreboot will then store its code coverage information into CBMEM, if possible. Then, run "cbmem -CV" as root on the target system running the instrumented coreboot binary. This will create a whole bunch of .gcda files that contain coverage information. Tar them up, copy them to your build system machine, and untar them. Then you can use your favorite coverage utility (gcov, lcov, ...) to visualize code coverage. For a sneak peak of what will expect you, please take a look at http://www.coreboot.org/~stepan/coreboot-coverage/ Change-Id: Ib287d8309878a1f5c4be770c38b1bc0bb3aa6ec7 Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2052 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin@se-eng.com> Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>