| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
A mainboard might want to configure some things differently when a
device is in an unprovisioned state. In the case when fw_config comes
from the Chromium EC, an unprovisioned device will not have a FW_CONFIG
tag in its CBI. This patch will set the fw_config value to
UNDEFINED_FW_CONFIG in the case of an error retrieving the value, as
well as adding a function, `fw_config_is_provisioned()` to indicate the
provisioning status.
BUG=none
TEST=remove fw_config from chromium EC CBI, add code to mainboard to
print return value of fw_config_is_provisioned() (`0`), add
fw_config back to CBI, run same test and see `1`.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ib3046233667e97a5f78961fabacbeb3099b3d442
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/47956
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Vaccaro <nvaccaro@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
This patch renames cbfs_boot_map_with_leak() and cbfs_boot_load_file()
to cbfs_map() and cbfs_load() respectively. This is supposed to be the
start of a new, better organized CBFS API where the most common
operations have the most simple and straight-forward names. Less
commonly used variants of these operations (e.g. cbfs_ro_load() or
cbfs_region_load()) can be introduced later. It seems unnecessary to
keep carrying around "boot" in the names of most CBFS APIs if the vast
majority of accesses go to the boot CBFS (instead, more unusual
operations should have longer names that describe how they diverge from
the common ones).
cbfs_map() is paired with a new cbfs_unmap() to allow callers to cleanly
reap mappings when desired. A few new cbfs_unmap() calls are added to
generic code where it makes sense, but it seems unnecessary to introduce
this everywhere in platform or architecture specific code where the boot
medium is known to be memory-mapped anyway. In fact, even for
non-memory-mapped platforms, sometimes leaking a mapping to the CBFS
cache is a much cleaner solution than jumping through hoops to provide
some other storage for some long-lived file object, and it shouldn't be
outright forbidden when it makes sense.
Additionally, remove the type arguments from these function signatures.
The goal is to eventually remove type arguments for lookup from the
whole CBFS API. Filenames already uniquely identify CBFS files. The type
field is just informational, and there should be APIs to allow callers
to check it when desired, but it's not clear what we gain from forcing
this as a parameter into every single CBFS access when the vast majority
of the time it provides no additional value and is just clutter.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ib24325400815a9c3d25f66c61829a24a239bb88e
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39304
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com>
Reviewed-by: Mariusz Szafrański <mariuszx.szafranski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Further patches will make use of this raw 64-bit value.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I161893c09da6a44265299f6ae3c3a81249a96084
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46604
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
We all knew this was coming, 32 bits is never enough. Doing this early
so that it doesn't affect too much code yet. Take care of every usage of
fw_config throughout the codebase so the conversion is all done at once.
BUG=b:169668368
TEST=Hacked up this code to OR 0x1_000_0000 with CBI-sourced FW_CONFIG
and verify the console print contained that bit.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I6f2065d347eafa0ef7b346caeabdc3b626402092
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/45939
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Make boot state init run before the init_chips code. This allows for
correcting tbt settings at a stage earlier than devicetree parsing.
BUG=b:167983038
TEST=none
Change-Id: I8364746ba311575e7de93fa25241ffef7faf35b4
Signed-off-by: Nick Vaccaro <nvaccaro@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/45961
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Add a backing cache for all successfully probed fw_config fields that
originated as `probe` statements in the devicetree. This allows recall
of the `struct fw_config` which was probed.
BUG=b:161963281
TEST=tested with follower patch
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I0d014206a4ee6cc7592e12e704a7708652330eaf
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44782
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
This change introduces a new top-level interface for interacting with a
bitmask providing firmware configuration information.
This is motivated by Chromebook mainboards that need to support multiple
different configurations at runtime with the same BIOS. In these
devices the Embedded Controller provides a bitmask that can be broken
down into different fields and each field can then be broken down into
different options.
The firmware configuration value could also be stored in CBFS and this
interface will look in CBFS first to allow the Embedded Controller value
to be overridden.
The firmware configuration interface is intended to easily integrate
into devicetree.cb and lead to less code duplication for new mainboards
that make use of this feature.
BUG=b:147462631
TEST=this provides a new interface that is tested in subsequent commits
Change-Id: I1e889c235a81545e2ec0e3a34dfa750ac828a330
Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41209
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
