summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/lib/bootsplash.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-12-02cbfs: Simplify load/map API names, remove type argumentsJulius Werner
This patch renames cbfs_boot_map_with_leak() and cbfs_boot_load_file() to cbfs_map() and cbfs_load() respectively. This is supposed to be the start of a new, better organized CBFS API where the most common operations have the most simple and straight-forward names. Less commonly used variants of these operations (e.g. cbfs_ro_load() or cbfs_region_load()) can be introduced later. It seems unnecessary to keep carrying around "boot" in the names of most CBFS APIs if the vast majority of accesses go to the boot CBFS (instead, more unusual operations should have longer names that describe how they diverge from the common ones). cbfs_map() is paired with a new cbfs_unmap() to allow callers to cleanly reap mappings when desired. A few new cbfs_unmap() calls are added to generic code where it makes sense, but it seems unnecessary to introduce this everywhere in platform or architecture specific code where the boot medium is known to be memory-mapped anyway. In fact, even for non-memory-mapped platforms, sometimes leaking a mapping to the CBFS cache is a much cleaner solution than jumping through hoops to provide some other storage for some long-lived file object, and it shouldn't be outright forbidden when it makes sense. Additionally, remove the type arguments from these function signatures. The goal is to eventually remove type arguments for lookup from the whole CBFS API. Filenames already uniquely identify CBFS files. The type field is just informational, and there should be APIs to allow callers to check it when desired, but it's not clear what we gain from forcing this as a parameter into every single CBFS access when the vast majority of the time it provides no additional value and is just clutter. Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Change-Id: Ib24325400815a9c3d25f66c61829a24a239bb88e Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39304 Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com> Reviewed-by: Mariusz Szafrański <mariuszx.szafranski@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-05-11treewide: Remove "this file is part of" linesPatrick Georgi
Stefan thinks they don't add value. Command used: sed -i -e '/file is part of /d' $(git grep "file is part of " |egrep ":( */\*.*\*/\$|#|;#|-- | *\* )" | cut -d: -f1 |grep -v crossgcc |grep -v gcov | grep -v /elf.h |grep -v nvramtool) The exceptions are for: - crossgcc (patch file) - gcov (imported from gcc) - elf.h (imported from GNU's libc) - nvramtool (more complicated header) The removed lines are: - fmt.Fprintln(f, "/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */") -# This file is part of a set of unofficial pre-commit hooks available -/* This file is part of coreboot */ -# This file is part of msrtool. -/* This file is part of msrtool. */ - * This file is part of ncurses, designed to be appended after curses.h.in -/* This file is part of pgtblgen. */ - * This file is part of the coreboot project. - /* This file is part of the coreboot project. */ -# This file is part of the coreboot project. -# This file is part of the coreboot project. -## This file is part of the coreboot project. --- This file is part of the coreboot project. -/* This file is part of the coreboot project */ -/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */ -;## This file is part of the coreboot project. -# This file is part of the coreboot project. It originated in the - * This file is part of the coreinfo project. -## This file is part of the coreinfo project. - * This file is part of the depthcharge project. -/* This file is part of the depthcharge project. */ -/* This file is part of the ectool project. */ - * This file is part of the GNU C Library. - * This file is part of the libpayload project. -## This file is part of the libpayload project. -/* This file is part of the Linux kernel. */ -## This file is part of the superiotool project. -/* This file is part of the superiotool project */ -/* This file is part of uio_usbdebug */ Change-Id: I82d872b3b337388c93d5f5bf704e9ee9e53ab3a9 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41194 Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-04-04src/lib: Use SPDX for GPL-2.0-only filesAngel Pons
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now. Change-Id: Id3a0b63272ebda3dad13803700bcff36d36f4815 Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40054 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
2020-03-17src (minus soc and mainboard): Remove copyright noticesPatrick Georgi
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example: - What's a "Copyright $year-present"? - Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current copyright holder? - People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even though they only deleted stuff - Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year, because why not? - Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"? - Or "Generated Code"? Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead and use the git history to deal with the rest. Change-Id: I89b10076e0f4a4b3acd59160fb7abe349b228321 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39611 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-09-27lib/bootsplash: Fix compilationPatrick Rudolph
Add missing include. Tested on Supermicro X11SSH-TF. Change-Id: Id0c80ac646001a497e96cae4d48a0f09762eb936 Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35613 Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-09-15lib/coreboot_table: Show splashscreen in lb_table_initJohanna Schander
Every vga init implementation needs to cache the framebuffer state to be able to fill the lb_framebuffer struct later on in the fill_lb_framebuffer call. Showing the bootsplash afterwards guarantees to have the same interface into all the vga drivers. This is by far from ideal, as it only allows for a single driver at compile-time and should be adapted in the future. It was tested on the wip razer blade stealth using vgabios @ 1280x1024 and also in Qemu @ 1280x1024. By default the qemu framebuffer will be initialized in 800x600@32. This can be overwriten by configuration by setting CONFIG_DRIVERS_EMULATION_QEMU_BOCHS_{X,Y}RES . Change-Id: I4bec06d22423627e8f429c4b47e0dc9920f1464e Signed-off-by: Johanna Schander <coreboot@mimoja.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34599 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
2019-08-21lib/bootsplash: Log bootsplash dimensions and framebuffer dimensionsJohanna Schander
The bootsplash.jpg needs to match the framebuffer resolution. Configuration errors are more visible if they can be compared easily. Changed message to be always printed: "Setting up bootsplash in ${FRAMEBUFFER_RESOLUTION}" Added message: "Bootsplash image resolution: ${IMAGE_RESOLUTION}" Change-Id: Ib4a06d53c0134b99d3e9e6d3eda9fa30fca9ef7d Signed-off-by: Johanna Schander <coreboot@mimoja.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34598 Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-07-26src/device/oprom: Fix bootsplash display code for optionromsJohanna Schander
So far the bootsplash is only correctly rendered if the framebuffer is set up as 1024x768@16. Different resolutions did not show anything, differnent depth resulted in the distorted images. This commit removes this limit by using the actual framebuffer resolutions and combines the code for x86 and yabel. For the moment the bootsplash is still limited to VGA-OptionROM framebuffer init. It was tested in 1280x1024@32 on the wip razer blade stealth using the intel vgabios. Change-Id: I5ab7b8a0f28badaa16e25dbe807158870d06e26a Signed-off-by: Johanna Schander <coreboot@mimoja.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34537 Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>