| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Change-Id: Ie7e36cfa5a09d94bb58f12f9bd262255a630424c
Signed-off-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/81819
Reviewed-by: Yidi Lin <yidilin@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
To quote its repo[0]: Wuffs is a memory-safe programming language (and
a standard library written in that language) for Wrangling Untrusted
File Formats Safely. Wrangling includes parsing, decoding and encoding.
It compiles its library, written in its own language, to a C/C++ source
file that can then be used independently without needing support for
the language. That library is now imported to src/vendorcode/wuffs/.
This change modifies our linters to ignore that directory because
it's supposed to contain the wuffs compiler's result verbatim.
Nigel Tao provided an initial wrapper around wuffs' jpeg decoder
that implements our JPEG API. I further changed it a bit regarding
data placement, dropped stuff from our API that wasn't ever used,
or isn't used anymore, and generally made it fit coreboot a bit
better. Features are Nigel's, bugs are mine.
This commit also adapts our jpeg fuzz test to work with the modified
API. After limiting it to deal only with approximately screen sized
inputs, it fuzzed for 25 hours CPU time without a single hang or
crash. This is a notable improvement over running the test with our
old decoder which crashes within a minute.
Finally, I tried the new parser with a pretty-much-random JPEG file
I got from the internet, and it just showed it (once the resolution
matched), which is also a notable improvement over the old decoder
which is very particular about the subset of JPEG it supports.
In terms of code size, a QEmu build's ramstage increases
from 128060 bytes decompressed (64121 bytes after LZMA)
to 172304 bytes decompressed (82734 bytes after LZMA).
[0] https://github.com/google/wuffs
Change-Id: If8fa7da69da1ad412f27c2c5e882393c7739bc82
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@coreboot.org>
Based-on-work-by: Nigel Tao <nigeltao@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/78271
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@mailbox.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin L Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
In the JPEG decoder, use `bytes_per_line` instead of `width` for
address calculations, to allow for bigger framebuffers. When
calling jpeg_decode(), add an offset to the framebuffer address
so the picture gets centered.
Change-Id: I0174bdccfaad425e708a5fa50bcb28a1b98a23f7
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/76424
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin L Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@mailbox.org>
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subratabanik@google.com>
|
|
This patch renames cbfs_boot_map_with_leak() and cbfs_boot_load_file()
to cbfs_map() and cbfs_load() respectively. This is supposed to be the
start of a new, better organized CBFS API where the most common
operations have the most simple and straight-forward names. Less
commonly used variants of these operations (e.g. cbfs_ro_load() or
cbfs_region_load()) can be introduced later. It seems unnecessary to
keep carrying around "boot" in the names of most CBFS APIs if the vast
majority of accesses go to the boot CBFS (instead, more unusual
operations should have longer names that describe how they diverge from
the common ones).
cbfs_map() is paired with a new cbfs_unmap() to allow callers to cleanly
reap mappings when desired. A few new cbfs_unmap() calls are added to
generic code where it makes sense, but it seems unnecessary to introduce
this everywhere in platform or architecture specific code where the boot
medium is known to be memory-mapped anyway. In fact, even for
non-memory-mapped platforms, sometimes leaking a mapping to the CBFS
cache is a much cleaner solution than jumping through hoops to provide
some other storage for some long-lived file object, and it shouldn't be
outright forbidden when it makes sense.
Additionally, remove the type arguments from these function signatures.
The goal is to eventually remove type arguments for lookup from the
whole CBFS API. Filenames already uniquely identify CBFS files. The type
field is just informational, and there should be APIs to allow callers
to check it when desired, but it's not clear what we gain from forcing
this as a parameter into every single CBFS access when the vast majority
of the time it provides no additional value and is just clutter.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ib24325400815a9c3d25f66c61829a24a239bb88e
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39304
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com>
Reviewed-by: Mariusz Szafrański <mariuszx.szafranski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Stefan thinks they don't add value.
Command used:
sed -i -e '/file is part of /d' $(git grep "file is part of " |egrep ":( */\*.*\*/\$|#|;#|-- | *\* )" | cut -d: -f1 |grep -v crossgcc |grep -v gcov | grep -v /elf.h |grep -v nvramtool)
The exceptions are for:
- crossgcc (patch file)
- gcov (imported from gcc)
- elf.h (imported from GNU's libc)
- nvramtool (more complicated header)
The removed lines are:
- fmt.Fprintln(f, "/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */")
-# This file is part of a set of unofficial pre-commit hooks available
-/* This file is part of coreboot */
-# This file is part of msrtool.
-/* This file is part of msrtool. */
- * This file is part of ncurses, designed to be appended after curses.h.in
-/* This file is part of pgtblgen. */
- * This file is part of the coreboot project.
- /* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-## This file is part of the coreboot project.
--- This file is part of the coreboot project.
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project */
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-;## This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project. It originated in the
- * This file is part of the coreinfo project.
-## This file is part of the coreinfo project.
- * This file is part of the depthcharge project.
-/* This file is part of the depthcharge project. */
-/* This file is part of the ectool project. */
- * This file is part of the GNU C Library.
- * This file is part of the libpayload project.
-## This file is part of the libpayload project.
-/* This file is part of the Linux kernel. */
-## This file is part of the superiotool project.
-/* This file is part of the superiotool project */
-/* This file is part of uio_usbdebug */
Change-Id: I82d872b3b337388c93d5f5bf704e9ee9e53ab3a9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41194
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now.
Change-Id: Id3a0b63272ebda3dad13803700bcff36d36f4815
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40054
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I89b10076e0f4a4b3acd59160fb7abe349b228321
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39611
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Add missing include.
Tested on Supermicro X11SSH-TF.
Change-Id: Id0c80ac646001a497e96cae4d48a0f09762eb936
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35613
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Every vga init implementation needs to cache the framebuffer state
to be able to fill the lb_framebuffer struct later on in the
fill_lb_framebuffer call. Showing the bootsplash afterwards
guarantees to have the same interface into all the vga drivers.
This is by far from ideal, as it only allows for a single driver at
compile-time and should be adapted in the future.
It was tested on the wip razer blade stealth using vgabios @ 1280x1024
and also in Qemu @ 1280x1024.
By default the qemu framebuffer will be initialized in 800x600@32.
This can be overwriten by configuration by setting
CONFIG_DRIVERS_EMULATION_QEMU_BOCHS_{X,Y}RES .
Change-Id: I4bec06d22423627e8f429c4b47e0dc9920f1464e
Signed-off-by: Johanna Schander <coreboot@mimoja.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34599
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
|
|
The bootsplash.jpg needs to match the framebuffer resolution.
Configuration errors are more visible if they can be compared
easily.
Changed message to be always printed:
"Setting up bootsplash in ${FRAMEBUFFER_RESOLUTION}"
Added message:
"Bootsplash image resolution: ${IMAGE_RESOLUTION}"
Change-Id: Ib4a06d53c0134b99d3e9e6d3eda9fa30fca9ef7d
Signed-off-by: Johanna Schander <coreboot@mimoja.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34598
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
So far the bootsplash is only correctly rendered if the framebuffer is
set up as 1024x768@16.
Different resolutions did not show anything, differnent depth resulted
in the distorted images.
This commit removes this limit by using the actual framebuffer resolutions
and combines the code for x86 and yabel.
For the moment the bootsplash is still limited to VGA-OptionROM
framebuffer init.
It was tested in 1280x1024@32 on the wip razer blade stealth using the
intel vgabios.
Change-Id: I5ab7b8a0f28badaa16e25dbe807158870d06e26a
Signed-off-by: Johanna Schander <coreboot@mimoja.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34537
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
