Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Correct a typo in a comment introduced in commit »coreboot:
introduce monotonic timer API« (a421791d) [1].
[1] http://review.coreboot.org/3152
Change-Id: Ia0abc5304547d419478db1ae37b5525406fa19cc
Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3261
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
The current way to get a simple mono_time difference is:
1. Declare a rela_time struct
2. Assign it the value of mono_time_diff(t1, t2)
3. Get microseconds from it using rela_time_in_microseconds().
This patch adds a simpler method. Now one only needs to call
mono_time_diff_microseconds(t1, t2) to obtain the same value which
is produced from the above three steps.
Change-Id: Ibfc9cd211e48e8e60a0a7703bff09cee3250e88b
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3190
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
A timer queue provides the mechanism for calling functions
in the future by way of a callback. It utilizes the MONOTONIC_TIMER
to track time through the boot. The implementation is a min-heap
for keeping track of the next-to-expire callback.
Change-Id: Ia56bab8444cd6177b051752342f53b53d5f6afc1
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3158
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
The notion of a monotonic timer is introduced. Along with it
are helper functions and other types for comparing times. This
is just the framework where it is the responsibility of the
chipset/board to provide the implementation of timer_monotonic_get().
The reason structs are used instead of native types is to allow
for future changes to the data structure without chaning all the
call sites.
Change-Id: Ie56b9ab9dedb0da69dea86ef87ca744004eb1ae3
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3152
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|