| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
In order to accommodate tracking timestamps in all the
__PRE_RAM__ stages (bootblock, verstage, romstage, etc)
of a platform one needs to provide a way to specify
a persistent region of SRAM or cache-as-ram to store
the timestamps until cbmem comes online. Provide that
infrastructure.
Based on original patches from chromium.org:
Original-Change-Id: I4d78653c0595523eeeb02115423e7fecceea5e1e
Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/223348
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Change-Id: Ie5ffda3112d626068bd1904afcc5a09bc4916d16
Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/224024
Original-Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I8779526136e89ae61a6f177ce5c74a6530469ae1
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10790
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Squashed and adjusted two changes from chromium.git. Covers
CBMEM init for ROMTAGE and RAMSTAGE.
cbmem: Unify random on-CBMEM-init tasks under common CBMEM_INIT_HOOK() API
There are several use cases for performing a certain task when CBMEM is
first set up (usually to migrate some data into it that was previously
kept in BSS/SRAM/hammerspace), and unfortunately we handle each of them
differently: timestamp migration is called explicitly from
cbmem_initialize(), certain x86-chipset-specific tasks use the
CAR_MIGRATION() macro to register a hook, and the CBMEM console is
migrated through a direct call from romstage (on non-x86 and SandyBridge
boards).
This patch decouples the CAR_MIGRATION() hook mechanism from
cache-as-RAM and rechristens it to CBMEM_INIT_HOOK(), which is a clearer
description of what it really does. All of the above use cases are
ported to this new, consistent model, allowing us to have one less line
of boilerplate in non-CAR romstages.
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Built and booted on Nyan_Blaze and Falco with and without
CONFIG_CBMEM_CONSOLE. Confirmed that 'cbmem -c' shows the full log after
boot (and the resume log after S3 resume on Falco). Compiled for Parrot,
Stout and Lumpy.
Original-Change-Id: I1681b372664f5a1f15c3733cbd32b9b11f55f8ea
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/232612
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
cbmem: Extend hooks to ramstage, fix timestamp synching
Commit 7dd5bbd71 (cbmem: Unify random on-CBMEM-init tasks under common
CBMEM_INIT_HOOK() API) inadvertently broke ramstage timestamps since
timestamp_sync() was no longer called there. Oops.
This patch fixes the issue by extending the CBMEM_INIT_HOOK() mechanism
to the cbmem_initialize() call in ramstage. The macro is split into
explicit ROMSTAGE_/RAMSTAGE_ versions to make the behavior as clear as
possible and prevent surprises (although just using a single macro and
relying on the Makefiles to link an object into all appropriate stages
would also work).
This allows us to get rid of the explicit cbmemc_reinit() in ramstage
(which I somehow accounted for in the last patch without realizing that
timestamps work exactly the same way...), and replace the older and less
flexible cbmem_arch_init() mechanism.
Also added a size assertion for the pre-RAM CBMEM console to memlayout
that could prevent a very unlikely buffer overflow I just noticed.
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Booted on Pinky and Falco, confirmed that ramstage timestamps once
again show up. Compile-tested for Rambi and Samus.
Original-Change-Id: If907266c3f20dc3d599b5c968ea5b39fe5c00e9c
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/233533
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I1be89bafacfe85cba63426e2d91f5d8d4caa1800
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7878
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
A new CBFS API is introduced to allow making CBFS access
easier for providing multiple CBFS sources. That is achieved
by decoupling the cbfs source from a CBFS file. A CBFS
source is described by a descriptor. It contains the necessary
properties for walking a CBFS to locate a file. The CBFS
file is then decoupled from the CBFS descriptor in that it's
no longer needed to access the contents of the file.
All of this is accomplished using the regions infrastructure
by repsenting CBFS sources and files as region_devices. Because
region_devices can be chained together forming subregions this
allows one to decouple a CBFS source from a file. This also allows
one to provide CBFS files that came from other sources for
payload and/or stage loading.
The program loading takes advantage of those very properties
by allowing multiple sources for locating a program. Because of
this we can reduce the overhead of loading programs because
it's all done in the common code paths. Only locating the
program is per source.
Change-Id: I339b84fce95f03d1dbb63a0f54a26be5eb07f7c8
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9134
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to
shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons
but because there are tools that look for them, and giving
them a standard pattern simplifies things.
However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update
every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a
new lease, but can drop the address instead.
util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that
we may want to synchronize every now and then.
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, *MA[, ]*02110-1301[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]*Suite 330, Boston, MA *02111-1307[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f
-a \! -name \*.patch \
-a \! -name \*_shipped \
-a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \
-a \! -name LGPL.txt \
-a \! -name COPYING \
-a \! -name DISCLAIMER \
-exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch introduces a new option (CONFIG_MULTIPLE_CBFS_INSTANCES) to
allow multiple CBFS instances in the bootrom.
When the new option is enabled, the code running on the target
controls which CBFS instance is used. Since all other then header CBFS
structures use relative addressing, the only value which needs
explicit setting is the offset of the CBFS header in the bootrom.
This patch adds a facility to set the CBFS header offset. The offset
value of zero means default. i.e. the CBFS initialization code still
discovers the offset through the value saved at the top of the ROM.
BRANCH=storm
BUG=chrome-os-partner:34161, chromium:445938
TEST=with the rest patches in, storm target successfully boots from RW
section A.
Change-Id: Id8333c9373e61597f0c653c727dcee4ef6a58cd2
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: e57a3a15bba7cdcca4a5d684ed78f8ac6dbbc95e
Original-Change-Id: I4c026389ec4fbaa19bd11b2160202282d2f9283c
Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/237569
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9747
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <edward.ocallaghan@koparo.com>
|
|
We've traditionally tucked the framebuffer at the end of memory (above
CBMEM) on ARM and declared it reserved through coreboot's resource
allocator. This causes depthcharge to mark this area as reserved in the
kernel's device tree, which may be necessary to avoid display corruption
on handoff but also wastes space that the OS could use instead.
Since rk3288 boards now have proper display shutdown code in
depthcharge, keeping the framebuffer memory reserved across the handoff
(and thus throughout the lifetime of the system) should no longer be
necessary. For now let's just switch the rk3288 implementation to define
it through memlayout instead, which is not communicated through the
coreboot tables and will get treated as normal memory by depthcharge.
Note that this causes it to get wiped in developer/recovery mode, which
should not be a problem because that is done in response to VbInit()
(long before any images are drawn) and 0 is the default value for a
corebootfb anyway (a black pixel).
Eventually, we might want to think about adding more memory types to
coreboot's resource system (e.g. "reserved until kernel handoff", or
something specifically for the frame buffer) to model this situation
better, and maybe merge it with memlayout somehow.
CQ-DEPEND=CL:239470
BRANCH=veyron
BUG=chrome-os-partner:34713
TEST=Booted Jerry, noticed that 'free' now displays 0x7f000 more bytes
than before (curiously not 0x80000 bytes, I guess there's some alignment
waste in the kernel somewhere). Made sure the memory map output from
coreboot looks as expected, there's no visible display corruption in
developer/recovery mode and the 'cbmem' utility still works.
Change-Id: I12b7bfc1b7525f5a08cb7c64f0ff1b174df252d4
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 10afdba54dd5d680acec9cb3fe5b9234e33ca5a2
Original-Change-Id: I1950407d3b734e2845ef31bcef7bc59b96c2ea03
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/240819
Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9732
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
This patch adds an mmu_config_range_kb() function, which can set memory
types at the 4KB level by chaining a fine-grained page table to an
existing superpage entry. It is only intended for special cases where
this level of precision is really necessary and therefore comes with a
few practical limitations (the area for each invocation must be confined
within a single superpage, and you are not allowed to remap the same
region with mmu_config_range() again later). Since the fine-grained page
tables need some space, boards intending to use this feature must define
a TTB_SUBTABLES() region in their memlayout.ld.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:32848
TEST=Booted both Veyron_Pinky (normal) and Nyan_Blaze (LPAE), ensured
that they still work. Checksummed the page tables with and without this
patch, confirmed that they end up equal. Hacked in some subtable test
entries, hexdumped all tables and manually confirmed that they look as
expected.
Change-Id: I8c3eb7c2eb9c82e2abc5f2c0dda91f5b2eee7023
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 2f13e60cf5509b9a63fb7b8d84846daf889dc1b7
Original-Change-Id: Iedf7ca435ae337ead85115200d6987fb0d4828d7
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/223781
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9341
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
This patch creates a new mechanism to define the static memory layout
(primarily in SRAM) for a given board, superseding the brittle mass of
Kconfigs that we were using before. The core part is a memlayout.ld file
in the mainboard directory (although boards are expected to just include
the SoC default in most cases), which is the primary linker script for
all stages (though not rmodules for now). It uses preprocessor macros
from <memlayout.h> to form a different valid linker script for all
stages while looking like a declarative, boilerplate-free map of memory
addresses to the programmer. Linker asserts will automatically guarantee
that the defined regions cannot overlap. Stages are defined with a
maximum size that will be enforced by the linker. The file serves to
both define and document the memory layout, so that the documentation
cannot go missing or out of date.
The mechanism is implemented for all boards in the ARM, ARM64 and MIPS
architectures, and should be extended onto all systems using SRAM in the
future. The CAR/XIP environment on x86 has very different requirements
and the layout is generally not as static, so it will stay like it is
and be unaffected by this patch (save for aligning some symbol names for
consistency and sharing the new common ramstage linker script include).
BUG=None
TEST=Booted normally and in recovery mode, checked suspend/resume and
the CBMEM console on Falco, Blaze (both normal and vboot2), Pinky and
Pit. Compiled Ryu, Storm and Urara, manually compared the disassemblies
with ToT and looked for red flags.
Change-Id: Ifd2276417f2036cbe9c056f17e42f051bcd20e81
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: f1e2028e7ebceeb2d71ff366150a37564595e614
Original-Change-Id: I005506add4e8fcdb74db6d5e6cb2d4cb1bd3cda5
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/213370
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9283
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@gmx.at>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
|
