| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This patch introduces a newer API to reload the microcode patch when
SoC selects RELOAD_MICROCODE_PATCH config.
Expected to call this API being independent of CPU MP Init regular
flow hence, doesn't regress the boot time.
BUG=b:233199592
TEST=Build and boot google/kano to ChromeOS.
Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subratabanik@google.com>
Change-Id: If480e44b88d04e5cb25d7104961b70f7be041a23
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/65156
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Lean Sheng Tan <sheng.tan@9elements.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
|
|
CB:49896 added support in `intel_microcode_find()` to cache the found
microcode for faster subsequent accesses. This works okay when the
function succeeds in finding the microcode on BSP. However, if for any
reason, `cpu_microcode_blob.bin` does not contain a valid microcode
for the given processor, then the logic ends up attempting to find
microcode again and again every time it is called (because
`ucode_updates` is set to NULL on failed find, thus retriggering the
whole find sequence every time). This leads to a weird race condition
when multiple APs are running in parallel and executing this
function.
A snippet of the issues observed in the scenario described above:
```
...
microcode: Update skipped, already up-to-date
...
Microcode header corrupted!
...
```
1. AP reports that microcode update is being skipped since the current
version matches the version in CBFS (even though there is no matching
microcode update in CBFS).
2. AP reports microcode header is corrupted because it thinks that the
data size reported in the microcode is larger than the file read from
CBFS.
Above issues occur because each time an AP calls
`intel_microcode_find()`, it might end up seeing some intermittent
state of `ucode_updates` and taking incorrect action.
This change fixes this race condition by separating the logic for
finding microcode into an internal function `find_cbfs_microcode()`
and maintaining the caching logic in `intel_microcode_find()` using a
boolean flag `microcode_checked`.
BUG=b:182232187
TEST=Verified that `intel_microcode_find()` no longer makes repeated
attempts to find microcode from CBFS if it failed the first time.
Change-Id: I8600c830ba029e5cb9c0d7e0f1af18d87c61ad3a
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/51371
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I9b03105a6808a67c2101917e1822729407271627
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50441
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
|
|
Cache the found microcode for faster subsequent accesses.
Change-Id: Ic40d57964600f8f20ddb26c7d1691b043fd89f29
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49896
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Stefan thinks they don't add value.
Command used:
sed -i -e '/file is part of /d' $(git grep "file is part of " |egrep ":( */\*.*\*/\$|#|;#|-- | *\* )" | cut -d: -f1 |grep -v crossgcc |grep -v gcov | grep -v /elf.h |grep -v nvramtool)
The exceptions are for:
- crossgcc (patch file)
- gcov (imported from gcc)
- elf.h (imported from GNU's libc)
- nvramtool (more complicated header)
The removed lines are:
- fmt.Fprintln(f, "/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */")
-# This file is part of a set of unofficial pre-commit hooks available
-/* This file is part of coreboot */
-# This file is part of msrtool.
-/* This file is part of msrtool. */
- * This file is part of ncurses, designed to be appended after curses.h.in
-/* This file is part of pgtblgen. */
- * This file is part of the coreboot project.
- /* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-## This file is part of the coreboot project.
--- This file is part of the coreboot project.
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project */
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-;## This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project. It originated in the
- * This file is part of the coreinfo project.
-## This file is part of the coreinfo project.
- * This file is part of the depthcharge project.
-/* This file is part of the depthcharge project. */
-/* This file is part of the ectool project. */
- * This file is part of the GNU C Library.
- * This file is part of the libpayload project.
-## This file is part of the libpayload project.
-/* This file is part of the Linux kernel. */
-## This file is part of the superiotool project.
-/* This file is part of the superiotool project */
-/* This file is part of uio_usbdebug */
Change-Id: I82d872b3b337388c93d5f5bf704e9ee9e53ab3a9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41194
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now.
Change-Id: I2fa3bad88bb5b068baa1cfc6bbcddaabb09da1c5
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40053
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I89b10076e0f4a4b3acd59160fb7abe349b228321
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39611
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I179264ee6681a7ba4488b9f1c6bce1a19b4e1772
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/30160
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
Add 4 helper functions to get microcode info.
* get_current_microcode_rev
return the the version of the currently running microcode.
* get_microcode_rev
extract microcode revision from the given patch.
* get_microcode_size
extract microcode size from the given patch.
* get_microcode_checksum
extract checksum from the given patch.
The simpler thing would be to just move the struct microcode
to microcode.h so that the structure members can be dereferenced.
To encapsulate the structure details added the helper functions.
This information will be used in future to compare microcodes for update.
Change-Id: I67a08ba40b393874d8cc17363fefe21e2ea904f3
Signed-off-by: Rizwan Qureshi <rizwan.qureshi@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27365
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
The previous usage of the intel microcode support supported using
the library under ROMCC and ramstage. Allow for microcode support
to be used in normal C-based romstage as well by:
1. Only using walkcbfs when ROMCC is defined.
2. Only using spinlocks if !__PRE_RAM__
The header file now unconditionally exposes the declarations
of the supporting functions.
Change-Id: I903578bcb4422b4c050903c53b60372b64b79af1
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/13611
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Some Intel SoCs which support SGX feature, report the
microcode patch revision one less than the actual revision.
This results in the same microcode patch getting loaded again.
Add a SoC specific check to avoid reloading the same patch.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:42046
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built for glados and tested on RVP3
CQ-DEPEND=CL:286054
Change-Id: Iab4c34c6c55119045947f598e89352867c67dcb8
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: ab2ed73db3581cd432f9bc84acca47f5e53a0e9b
Original-Change-Id: I4f7bf9c841e5800668208c11b0afcf8dba48a775
Original-Signed-off-by: Rizwan Qureshi <rizwan.qureshi@intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/287513
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11055
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to
shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons
but because there are tools that look for them, and giving
them a standard pattern simplifies things.
However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update
every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a
new lease, but can drop the address instead.
util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that
we may want to synchronize every now and then.
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, *MA[, ]*02110-1301[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]*Suite 330, Boston, MA *02111-1307[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f
-a \! -name \*.patch \
-a \! -name \*_shipped \
-a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \
-a \! -name LGPL.txt \
-a \! -name COPYING \
-a \! -name DISCLAIMER \
-exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
|
|
The sequence to inject microcode updates is virtually the same for all
Intel CPUs. The same function is used to inject the update in both CBFS
and hardcoded cases, and in both of these cases, the microcode resides in
the ROM. This should be a safe change across the board.
The function which loaded compiled-in microcode is also removed here in
order to prevent it from being used in the future.
The dummy terminators from microcode need to be removed if this change is
to work when generating microcode from several microcode_blob.c files, as
is the case for older socketed CPUs. Removal of dummy terminators is done
in a subsequent patch.
Change-Id: I2cc8220cc4cd4a87aa7fc750e6c60ccdfa9986e9
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4495
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@gmail.com>
|
|
CPU_MICROCODE_IN_CBFS was designed to mean that loading microcode updates
from a CBFS file is supported, however, the name implies that microcode is
present in CBFS. This has recently caused confusion both with contributions
from Google, as well as SAGE. Rename this option to
SUPPORT_CPU_UCODE_IN_CBFS in order to make it clearer that what is meant is
"hey, the code we have for this CPU supports loading microcode updates from
CBFS", and prevent further confusion.
Change-Id: I394555f690b5ab4cac6fbd3ddbcb740ab1138339
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4482
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Introduced in commit »intel microcode: split up microcode loading
stages« (98ffb426) [1].
[1] http://review.coreboot.org/2778
Change-Id: I626508b10f3998b43aaabd49853090b36f5d3eb0
Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2992
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
This patch only applies to CONFIG_MICROCODE_IN_CBFS. The intel microcode
update routine would always walk the CBFS for the microcode file. Then
it would loop through the whole file looking for a match then load the
microcode. This process was maintained for intel_update_microcode_from_cbfs(),
however 2 new functions were exported:
1. const void *intel_microcode_find(void)
2. void intel_microcode_load_unlocked(const void *microcode_patch)
The first locates a matching microcode while the second loads that
mircocode. These new functions can then be used to cache the found
microcode blob w/o having to re-walk the CBFS.
Booted baskingridge board to Linux and noted that all microcode
revisions match on all the CPUs.
Change-Id: Ifde3f3e5c100911c4f984dd56d36664a8acdf7d5
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2778
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch aims to improve the microcode in CBFS handling that was
brought by the last patches from Stefan and the Chromium team.
Choices in Kconfig
- 1) Generate microcode from tree (default)
- 2) Include external microcode file
- 3) Do not put microcode in CBFS
The idea is to give the user full control over including non-free
blobs in the final ROM image.
MICROCODE_INCLUDE_PATH Kconfig variable is eliminated. Microcode
is handled by a special class, cpu_microcode, as such:
cpu_microcode-y += microcode_file.c
MICROCODE_IN_CBFS should, in the future, be eliminated. Right now it is
needed by intel microcode updating. Once all intel cpus are converted to
cbfs updating, this variable can go away.
These files are then compiled and assembled into a binary CBFS file.
The advantage of doing it this way versus the current method is that
1) The rule is CPU-agnostic
2) Gives user more control over if and how to include microcode blobs
3) The rules for building the microcode binary are kept in
src/cpu/Makefile.inc, and thus would not clobber the other makefiles,
which are already overloaded and very difficult to navigate.
Change-Id: I38d0c9851691aa112e93031860e94895857ebb76
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1245
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Anton Kochkov <anton.kochkov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
When CONFIG_MICROCODE_IN_CBFS is enabled, find the microcode blob in
CBFS and pass it to intel_update_microcode() instead of using the
compiled in array.
CBFS accesses in pre-RAM and 'normal' environments are provided
through different API.
Change-Id: I35c1480edf87e550a7b88c4aadf079cf3ff86b5d
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1296
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
- add GPLv2 + copyright header after talking to Ron
- "bits" in struct microcode served no real purpose but
getting its address taken. Hence drop it
- use asm volatile instead of __asm__ volatile
- drop superfluous wrmsr (that seems to be harmless but
is still wrong) in read_microcode_rev
- use u32 instead of unsigned int where appropriate
- make code usable both in bootblock and in ramstage
- drop ROMCC style print_debug statements
- drop microcode update copy in Sandybridge bootblock
Change-Id: Iec4d5c7bfac210194caf577e8d72446e6dfb4b86
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/928
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3878 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
|
|
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@1659 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
|
