| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Add a new bootmem memory type OpenSBI.
It's similar to BL31 on aarch64.
Required for OpenSBI integration.
Change-Id: I5ceafd5a295f4284e99e12f7ea2aa4c6d1dbb188
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34140
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
After CL:31122, we can finally define a memory type specific for BL31,
to make sure BL31 is not loaded on other reserved area.
Change-Id: Idbd9a7fe4b12af23de1519892936d8d88a000e2c
Signed-off-by: Ting Shen <phoenixshen@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31123
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
Currently, selflock_check() verifies that the binary is loaded in an
usable RAM area.
Extend its functionality so we can also check that BL31 is loaded in
a manually reserved area, and fail early if the range is not protected.
Change-Id: Iecdeedd9e8da67f73ac47d2a82e85b306469a626
Signed-off-by: Ting Shen <phoenixshen@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31122
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
Bounce buffers used to be used in those cases where the payload
might overlap coreboot.
Bounce buffers are a problem for rampayloads as they need malloc.
They are also an artifact of our x86 past before we had relocatable
ramstage; only x86, out of the 5 architectures we support, needs them;
currently they only seem to matter on the following chipsets:
src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/Kconfig
src/northbridge/amd/lx/Kconfig
src/northbridge/via/vx900/Kconfig
src/soc/intel/fsp_baytrail/Kconfig
src/soc/intel/fsp_broadwell_de/Kconfig
The first three are obsolete or at least could be changed
to avoid the need to have bounce buffers.
The last two should change to no longer need them.
In any event they can be fixed or pegged to a release which supports
them.
For these five chipsets we change CONFIG_RAMBASE from 0x100000 (the
value needed in 1999 for the 32-bit Linux kernel, the original ramstage)
to 0xe00000 (14 Mib) which will put the non-relocatable x86
ramstage out of the way of any reasonable payload until we can
get rid of it for good.
14 MiB was chosen after some discussion, but it does fit well:
o Fits in the 16 MiB cacheable range coreboot sets up by default
o Most small payloads are well under 14 MiB (even kernels!)
o Most large payloads get loaded at 16 MiB (especially kernels!)
With this change in place coreboot correctly still loads a bzImage payload.
Werner reports that the 0xe00000 setting works on his broadwell systems.
Change-Id: I602feb32f35e8af1d0dc4ea9f25464872c9b824c
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28647
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Add bootmem_targets_usable_with_bounce() to handle
cases of payload loading via bounce-buffer.
Change-Id: I9ebbc621f8810c0317d7c97c6b4cdd41527ddcbb
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/26985
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
The patch series ending in 64049be (lib/bootmem: Add method to walk OS
POV memory tables) expanded the bootmem framework to also keep track of
memory regions that are only relevant while coreboot is still executing,
such as the ramstage code and data. Mixing this into the exsting bootmem
ranges has already caused an issue on CONFIG_RELOCATEABLE_RAMSTAGE
boards, because the ramstage code in CBMEM is marked as BM_RAMSTAGE
which ends up getting translated back to LB_RAM in the OS tables. This
was fixed in 1ecec5f (lib/bootmem: ensure ramstage memory isn't given to
OS) for this specific case, but unfortunately Arm boards can have a
similar problem where their stack space is sometimes located in an SRAM
region that should not be made available as RAM to the OS.
Since both the resources made available to the OS and the regions
reserved for coreboot can be different for each platform, we should find
a generic solution to this rather than trying to deal with each issue
individually. This patch solves the problem by keeping the OS point of
view and the coreboot-specific ranges separate from the start, rather
than cloning it out later. Ranges only relevant to the coreboot view
will never touch the OS-specific layout, to avoid the problem of losing
information about the original memory type of the underlying region that
needs to be restored for the OS view. This both supersedes the
RELOCATABLE_RAMSTAGE fix and resolves the problems on Arm boards.
Change-Id: I7bb018456b58ad9b0cfb0b8da8c26b791b487fbb
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/26182
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Add method to walk memory tables from OS point of view.
The tables don't change when modifiying bootmem entries and doesn't contain
bootmem specific tags.
Change-Id: Iee332a9821d12a7d9a684063b77b0502febd8d7d
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25747
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Add a method to walk bootmem memory tables and call a function
for each memory range. The tables might not match with OS sight
of view.
Return true if the callback function returned false.
Required for FIT support in coreboot to find a usable RAM region.
Tested on Cavium SoC.
Change-Id: I0004e5ad5fe2289827f370f0d0f9979d3cbd3926
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25583
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Introduce new bootmem tags to allow more fine grained control over buffer
allocation on various platforms. The new tags are:
BM_MEM_RAMSTAGE : Memory where any kind of boot firmware resides and that
should not be touched by bootmem (by example: stack,
TTB, program, ...).
BM_MEM_PAYLOAD : Memory where any kind of payload resides and that should
not be touched by bootmem.
Starting with this commit all bootmem methods will no longer see memory
that is used by coreboot as usable RAM.
Bootmem changes:
* Introduce a weak function to add platform specific memranges.
* Mark memory allocated by bootmem as BM_TAG_PAYLOAD.
* Assert on failures.
* Add _stack and _program as BM_MEM_RAMSTAGE.
ARMv7 and ARMv8 specific changes:
* Add _ttb and _postram_cbfs_cache as BM_MEM_RAMSTAGE.
ARMv7 specific changes:
* Add _ttb_subtables as BM_MEM_RAMSTAGE.
Change-Id: I0c983ce43616147c519a43edee3b61d54eadbb9a
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25383
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Introduce bootmem custom memory tags and use them instead of reusing
LB_MEM tags.
Use asserts in bootmem_add_range to verify parameters.
Tested with uImage payload on Cavium SoC.
Change-Id: I7be8fa792fc7933ca218ecd43d250d3a9c55caa6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25633
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
In https://review.coreboot.org/25383 people were confused about the
ordering of bootmem calls w.r.t. when entries are exposed to the OS. To
alleviate this add a notion of bootmem being initialized. In addition to
that, only mark bootmem initialized when bootmem_write_memory_table() is
called. Any other calls to bootmem before that will report an error on
the console.
Change-Id: I5bc31f555038ccabb82d902c54f95858679b1695
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25503
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
A architecture-specific function, named bootmem_arch_add_ranges(),
is added so that each architecture can add entries into the bootmem
memory map. This allows for a common write_tables() implementation
to avoid code duplication.
Change-Id: I834c82eae212869cad8bb02c7abcd9254d120735
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14434
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to
shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons
but because there are tools that look for them, and giving
them a standard pattern simplifies things.
However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update
every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a
new lease, but can drop the address instead.
util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that
we may want to synchronize every now and then.
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, *MA[, ]*02110-1301[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]*Suite 330, Boston, MA *02111-1307[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f
-a \! -name \*.patch \
-a \! -name \*_shipped \
-a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \
-a \! -name LGPL.txt \
-a \! -name COPYING \
-a \! -name DISCLAIMER \
-exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
|
|
The write_coreboot_table() in coreboot_table.c was already using
struct memrange for managing and building up the entries that
eventually go into the lb_memory table. Abstract that concept
out to a bootmem memory map. The bootmem concept can then be
used as a basis for loading payloads, for example.
Change-Id: I7edbbca6bbd0568f658fde39ca93b126cab88367
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5302
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
|
