coreboot.git - my copy of coreboot

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2016-02-26	lib/bootblock: provide SoC callback parity with mainboard	Aaron Durbin
	There was no 'early' call into the SoC code prior to console getting initialized. Not having this enforces the mainboard to drive the setup of the console which typically just ends up calling into the SoC code. Provide a SoC early init call to handle this without having to duplicate the same code in mainboards utilizing the same SoC. Change-Id: Ia233dc3ae89a77df284d6d5cf5b2b051ad3be089 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/13791 Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Andrey Petrov <andrey.petrov@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
2016-02-11	arches: lib: add main_decl.h for main() declaration	Aaron Durbin
	It is silly to have a single header to declare the main() symbol, however some of the arches provided it while lib/bootblock.c relied on the arch headers to declare it. Just move the declaration into its own header file and utilize it. Change-Id: I743b4c286956ae047c17fe46241b699feca73628 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/13681 Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2015-11-11	arm/arm64: Generalize bootblock C entry point	Julius Werner
	When we first added ARM support to coreboot, it was clear that the bootblock would need to do vastly different tasks than on x86, so we moved its main logic under arch/. Now that we have several more architectures, it turns out (as with so many things lately) that x86 is really the odd one out, and all the others are trying to do pretty much the same thing. This has already caused maintenance issues as the ARM32 bootblock developed and less-mature architectures were left behind with old cruft. This patch tries to address that problem by centralizing that logic under lib/ for use by all architectures/SoCs that don't explicitly opt-out (with the slightly adapted existing BOOTBLOCK_CUSTOM option). This works great out of the box for ARM32 and ARM64. It could probably be easily applied to MIPS and RISCV as well, but I don't have any of those boards to test so I'll mark them as BOOTBLOCK_CUSTOM for now and leave that for later cleanup. BRANCH=None BUG=None TEST=Built Jerry and Falco, booted Oak. Change-Id: Ibbf727ad93651e388aef20e76f03f5567f9860cb Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/12076 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)