aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/include/bootblock_common.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-09-22src/lib/bootblock.c: make bootblock_main_with_timestamp publicKangheui Won
bootblock_main_with_timestamp function allows to proceed with existing timestamp table. Apparently we never needed this, but Zork runs verstage in the PSP before bootblock. It'd be useful if we can grab timestamps for verstage from PSP and merge with coreboot timestamps. Making it non-static will enable us to do that. BUG=b:154142138, b:159220781 BRANCH=zork TEST=build firmware for zork Change-Id: I061c3fbb652c40bafa0a007aa75f2a82680f5e0a Signed-off-by: Kangheui Won <khwon@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/45468 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
2020-05-11treewide: Remove "this file is part of" linesPatrick Georgi
Stefan thinks they don't add value. Command used: sed -i -e '/file is part of /d' $(git grep "file is part of " |egrep ":( */\*.*\*/\$|#|;#|-- | *\* )" | cut -d: -f1 |grep -v crossgcc |grep -v gcov | grep -v /elf.h |grep -v nvramtool) The exceptions are for: - crossgcc (patch file) - gcov (imported from gcc) - elf.h (imported from GNU's libc) - nvramtool (more complicated header) The removed lines are: - fmt.Fprintln(f, "/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */") -# This file is part of a set of unofficial pre-commit hooks available -/* This file is part of coreboot */ -# This file is part of msrtool. -/* This file is part of msrtool. */ - * This file is part of ncurses, designed to be appended after curses.h.in -/* This file is part of pgtblgen. */ - * This file is part of the coreboot project. - /* This file is part of the coreboot project. */ -# This file is part of the coreboot project. -# This file is part of the coreboot project. -## This file is part of the coreboot project. --- This file is part of the coreboot project. -/* This file is part of the coreboot project */ -/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */ -;## This file is part of the coreboot project. -# This file is part of the coreboot project. It originated in the - * This file is part of the coreinfo project. -## This file is part of the coreinfo project. - * This file is part of the depthcharge project. -/* This file is part of the depthcharge project. */ -/* This file is part of the ectool project. */ - * This file is part of the GNU C Library. - * This file is part of the libpayload project. -## This file is part of the libpayload project. -/* This file is part of the Linux kernel. */ -## This file is part of the superiotool project. -/* This file is part of the superiotool project */ -/* This file is part of uio_usbdebug */ Change-Id: I82d872b3b337388c93d5f5bf704e9ee9e53ab3a9 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41194 Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-04-05src/include: Use SPDX for GPL-2.0-only filesAngel Pons
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now. Change-Id: I2fa3bad88bb5b068baa1cfc6bbcddaabb09da1c5 Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40053 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
2020-03-17src (minus soc and mainboard): Remove copyright noticesPatrick Georgi
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example: - What's a "Copyright $year-present"? - Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current copyright holder? - People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even though they only deleted stuff - Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year, because why not? - Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"? - Or "Generated Code"? Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead and use the git history to deal with the rest. Change-Id: I89b10076e0f4a4b3acd59160fb7abe349b228321 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39611 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-11-30AGESA,binaryPI: Add compatibility wrapper for romstage entryKyösti Mälkki
This simplifies transition and reviews towards C environment bootblock by allowing single cache_as_ram.S file to be used. Change-Id: I231972982e5ca6d0c08437693edf926b0eaf9ee1 Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37352 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Michał Żygowski <michal.zygowski@3mdeb.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-08-26lib/bootblock: Add simplified entry with basetimeKyösti Mälkki
This allows for minor optimization as num_timestamps becomes a constant zero for a function with local scope. The loop with calls to timestamp_add() gets removed from bootblock. Change-Id: Id230075c0e76fe377b6ea8c8ddf8318e07d29b91 Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34972 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2018-12-30bootblock: Move function prototypeKyösti Mälkki
Change-Id: I01ecb9a16099ac6189ce3f0bdbd43c23ad7c621d Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/30488 Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2018-08-09src/include: Fix typoElyes HAOUAS
Change-Id: Iff445dccf29957078b8308d73fb302d03cf47d31 Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27914 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
2018-05-22Introduce bootblock self-decompressionJulius Werner
Masked ROMs are the silent killers of boot speed on devices without memory-mapped SPI flash. They often contain awfully slow SPI drivers (presumably bit-banged) that take hundreds of milliseconds to load our bootblock, and every extra kilobyte of bootblock size has a hugely disproportionate impact on boot speed. The coreboot timestamps can never show that component, but it impacts our users all the same. This patch tries to alleviate that issue a bit by allowing us to compress the bootblock with LZ4, which can cut its size down to nearly half. Of course, masked ROMs usually don't come with decompression algorithms built in, so we need to introduce a little decompression stub that can decompress the rest of the bootblock. This is done by creating a new "decompressor" stage which runs before the bootblock, but includes the compressed bootblock code in its data section. It needs to be as small as possible to get a real benefit from this approach, which means no device drivers, no console output, no exception handling, etc. Besides the decompression algorithm itself we only include the timer driver so that we can measure the boot speed impact of decompression. On ARM and ARM64 systems, we also need to give SoC code a chance to initialize the MMU, since running decompression without MMU is prohibitively slow on these architectures. This feature is implemented for ARM and ARM64 architectures for now, although most of it is architecture-independent and it should be relatively simple to port to other platforms where a masked ROM loads the bootblock into SRAM. It is also supposed to be a clean starting point from which later optimizations can hopefully cut down the decompression stub size (currently ~4K on RK3399) a bit more. NOTE: Bootblock compression is not for everyone. Possible side effects include trying to run LZ4 on CPUs that come out of reset extremely underclocked or enabling this too early in SoC bring-up and getting frustrated trying to find issues in an undebuggable environment. Ask your SoC vendor if bootblock compression is right for you. Change-Id: I0dc1cad9ae7508892e477739e743cd1afb5945e8 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/26340 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2018-05-22bootblock: Allow more timestamps in bootblock_main_with_timestamp()Julius Werner
This patch adds more parameters to bootblock_main_with_timestamp() to give callers the opportunity to add additional timestamps that were recorded in the platform-specific initialization phase. Change-Id: Idf3a0fcf5aee88a33747afc69e055b95bd38750c Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/26339 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2017-03-13src/include: Move storage class to beginning of declarationLee Leahy
Fix the following warning detected by checkpatch.pl: WARNING: storage class should be at the beginning of the declaration The following storage class attribute is not detected by checkpatch.py: static cbmem_init_hook_t init_fn_ ## _ptr_ __attribute__((used, \ section(".rodata.cbmem_init_hooks"))) = init_fn_; The following lines generates a false positive: (pound)define STATIC static src/include/cpu/amd/common/cbtypes.h:60: WARNING: storage class should be at the beginning of the declaration typedef asmlinkage void (*smm_handler_t)(void *); src/include/cpu/x86/smm.h:514: WARNING: storage class should be at the beginning of the declaration (pound)define MAYBE_STATIC static src/include/stddef.h:34: WARNING: storage class should be at the beginning of the declaration TEST=Build and run on Galileo Gen2 Change-Id: Ie087d38e6171b549b90e0b831050ac44746a1e14 Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18657 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
2016-06-12bootblock: Declare common bootblock_pre_c_entry routineLee Leahy
Enable uses of a common bootblock_pre_c_entry routine. Pass in TSC value as a uint64_t value. TEST=Build for amenia and Galileo Gen2 Change-Id: I8be2e079ababb2cf1f9b7e6293f93e7c778761a1 Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15124 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Lee Leahy <lpleahyjr@gmail.com>
2016-06-09lib: Add asmlinkage attribute to bootblock_main_with_timestampLee Leahy
Add asmlinkage to bootblock_main_with_timestamp so that it may be called directly from the assembly code. TEST=Build for Amenia and Galileo Gen2 Change-Id: Iefb8e5c1ddce2ec495b9272966b595d5adcebc1c Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15125 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2016-05-19lib/bootblock: Provide mechanism to pass in an early timestampAlexandru Gagniuc
This is useful, for example, in the bootblock, when a timestamp is available which predates the call to main() in lib/bootblock.c Change-Id: I17bb0add9f2d8721504b2e534dd6904d1201989c Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <alexandrux.gagniuc@intel.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14862 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2016-02-26lib/bootblock: provide SoC callback parity with mainboardAaron Durbin
There was no 'early' call into the SoC code prior to console getting initialized. Not having this enforces the mainboard to drive the setup of the console which typically just ends up calling into the SoC code. Provide a SoC early init call to handle this without having to duplicate the same code in mainboards utilizing the same SoC. Change-Id: Ia233dc3ae89a77df284d6d5cf5b2b051ad3be089 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/13791 Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Andrey Petrov <andrey.petrov@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
2016-02-11arches: lib: add main_decl.h for main() declarationAaron Durbin
It is silly to have a single header to declare the main() symbol, however some of the arches provided it while lib/bootblock.c relied on the arch headers to declare it. Just move the declaration into its own header file and utilize it. Change-Id: I743b4c286956ae047c17fe46241b699feca73628 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/13681 Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2015-11-11arm/arm64: Generalize bootblock C entry pointJulius Werner
When we first added ARM support to coreboot, it was clear that the bootblock would need to do vastly different tasks than on x86, so we moved its main logic under arch/. Now that we have several more architectures, it turns out (as with so many things lately) that x86 is really the odd one out, and all the others are trying to do pretty much the same thing. This has already caused maintenance issues as the ARM32 bootblock developed and less-mature architectures were left behind with old cruft. This patch tries to address that problem by centralizing that logic under lib/ for use by all architectures/SoCs that don't explicitly opt-out (with the slightly adapted existing BOOTBLOCK_CUSTOM option). This works great out of the box for ARM32 and ARM64. It could probably be easily applied to MIPS and RISCV as well, but I don't have any of those boards to test so I'll mark them as BOOTBLOCK_CUSTOM for now and leave that for later cleanup. BRANCH=None BUG=None TEST=Built Jerry and Falco, booted Oak. Change-Id: Ibbf727ad93651e388aef20e76f03f5567f9860cb Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/12076 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)