| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Add const qualifier to first argument.
Change-Id: I6655e04401b6a7aa5cafb717ff6f46b80b96646e
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32703
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
|
|
Add API that should be implemented by the boot media drivers
for write-protecting a subregion.
Change-Id: I4c9376e2c2c7a4852f13c65824c6cd64a1c6ac0a
Signed-off-by: Rizwan Qureshi <rizwan.qureshi@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/28724
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
|
|
The current boot device usage assumes read-only semantics to
the boot device. Any time someone wants to write to the
boot device a device-specific API is invoked such as SPI flash.
Instead, provide a mechanism to retrieve an object that can
be used to perform writes to the boot device. On systems where
the implementations are symmetric these devices can be treated
one-in-the-same. However, for x86 systems with memory mapped SPI
the read-only boot device provides different operations.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:55932
Change-Id: I0af324824f9e1a8e897c2453c36e865b59c4e004
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/16194
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Instead of reaching into src/include and re-writing code
allow for cleaner code sharing within coreboot and its
utilities. The additional thing needed at this point is
for the utilities to provide a printk() declaration within
a <console/console.h> file. That way code which uses printk()
can than be mapped properly to verbosity of utility parameters.
Change-Id: I9e46a279569733336bc0a018aed96bc924c07cdd
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11592
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
|
|
The boot_device is a region_device that represents the
device from which coreboot retrieves and boots its stages.
The existing cbfs implementations use the boot_device as
the intermediary for accessing the CBFS region. Also,
there's currently only support for a read-only view of
the boot_device. i.e. one cannot write to the boot_device
using this view. However, a writable boot_device could
be added in the future.
Change-Id: Ic0da796ab161b8025c90631be3423ba6473ad31c
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10216
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
