summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/ec/google/chromeec/Makefile.inc
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2013-07-10ec/google: Support ChromeOS EC on SPI bus.Hung-Te Lin
For devices with ChromeOS EC on SPI bus, use the standard SPI driver interface (see spi-generic.h) to exchange data. Note: Only EC protocol v3 is supported for SPI bus. Change-Id: Ia8dcdecd125a2bd7424d0c7560e046b6d6988a03 Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3751 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-07-10ec/google: Generalize communication protocol support in EC drivers.Hung-Te Lin
Since EC protocol v3, the packet format will be the same for all buses (inclding I2C, SPI, and LPC). That will simplify the implementation in each individual bus driver source file. To prepare for that, we will move the protocol part into crosec_proto.c: crosec_command_proto, with bus driver in callback "crosec_io". Change-Id: I9ccd19a57a182899dd1ef1cd90598679c1546295 Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3749 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-04-18ChromeEC: Drop unneeded Kconfig variable EC_GOOGLE_API_ROOTStefan Reinauer
This used to contain the path for the EC include files, but those files are included in coreboot now. Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Change-Id: I4fce9831c5e21b0a69a6295dbda2580e1ca83369 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/47606 Reviewed-by: Randall Spangler <rspangler@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Tested-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3057 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-04-16ec/google: Support Google's Chrome EC on I2C interface.Hung-Te Lin
Google's Chrome EC can be installed on LPC or I2C bus, using different command protocol. This commit adds I2C support for devices like Google/Snow. Note: I2C interface cannot be automatically probed so the bus and chip number must be explicitly set. Verified by booting Google/Snow, with following console output: Google Chrome EC: Hello got back 11223344 status (0) Google Chrome EC: version: ro: snow_v1.3.108-30f8374 rw: snow_v1.3.128-e35f60e running image: 1 Change-Id: I8023eb96cf477755d277fd7991bdb7d9392f10f7 Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3074 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-04-12ec/google: Isolate EC bus protocol implementation.Hung-Te Lin
The Chrome EC can be connected by different types of bus like LPC / I2C / SPI, and the current implementation is only for LPC. To support other types, we must first isolate the LPC protocol stuff and add configuration variable (EC_GOOGLE_CHROMEEC_LPC) to specify bus type. Verified by building google/link (with chromeec) configuration successfully. Change-Id: Ib2920d8d935bcc77a5394e818f69e9265e26e8a0 Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3068 Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
2013-02-22Add support for Google ChromeECStefan Reinauer
Google ChromeEC is an EC with completely open source firmware. See https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/gitweb?p=chromiumos/platform/ec.git;a=summary for the EC firmware source code (aka more information about the ChromeEC) This patch adds support for the ChromeEC on coreboot's side. Great thanks to the ChromeEC team for this amazing work. It's another important milestone towards a free and open firmware stack on modern hardware. Change-Id: Iace78af9d291791d2f5f80ccca1587b418738cec Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@coreboot.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2481 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com> Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>