summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/drivers/uart/acpi/acpi.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-05-29tree: Remove unused <string.h>Elyes Haouas
Change-Id: I9ed1a82fcd3fc29124ddc406592bd45dc84d4628 Signed-off-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/82666 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com> Reviewed-by: Yidi Lin <yidilin@google.com>
2024-05-29tree: Use <stdio.h> for snprintfElyes Haouas
<stdio.h> header is used for input/output operations (such as printf, scanf, fopen, etc.). Although some input/output functions can manipulate strings, they do not need to directly include <string.h> because they are declared independently. Change-Id: Ibe2a4ff6f68843a6d99cfdfe182cf2dd922802aa Signed-off-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/82665 Reviewed-by: Yidi Lin <yidilin@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2024-04-12tree: Drop duplicated <device/{path,resource}.h>Elyes Haouas
<device/device.h> is supposed to provide <device/{path,resource}.h> Change-Id: I2ef82c8fe30b1c1399a9f85c1734ce8ba16a1f88 Signed-off-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/81830 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Eric Lai <ericllai@google.com>
2024-01-31include/device/device.h: Remove CHIP_NAME() macroNicholas Sudsgaard
Macros can be confusing on their own; hiding commas make things worse. This can sometimes be downright misleading. A "good" example would be the code in soc/intel/xeon_sp/spr/chip.c: CHIP_NAME("Intel SapphireRapids-SP").enable_dev = chip_enable_dev, This appears as CHIP_NAME() being some struct when in fact these are defining 2 separate members of the same struct. It was decided to remove this macro altogether, as it does not do anything special and incurs a maintenance burden. Change-Id: Iaed6dfb144bddcf5c43634b0c955c19afce388f0 Signed-off-by: Nicholas Sudsgaard <devel+coreboot@nsudsgaard.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80239 Reviewed-by: Yidi Lin <yidilin@google.com> Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit@felixsinger.de> Reviewed-by: Jakub Czapiga <czapiga@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
2023-01-15drivers/uart/acpi: Drop 'disable_gpio_export_in_crs' flagMatt DeVillier
Exposing the GPIOs via an ACPI PowerResource and the _CRS results in the OS driver and ACPI thinking they own the GPIO. This can cause timing problems because it's not clear which system should be controlling the GPIO. There's no reason to require explicit disablement however, so drop the superfluous 'disable' flag, and change the _CRS generation to check if the GPIOs will be exported via the 'has_power_resource' flag instead. This mirrors the change made for drivers/i2c/generic. TEST=untested, as no boards selected this option. Change-Id: Icb60502a4a7c5e7a1fcf1ee60e23c77e00d6de7b Signed-off-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@amd.corp-partner.google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/71851 Reviewed-by: Martin L Roth <gaumless@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-08-09drivers/uart/acpi: Update _S0W return value to D3hotTim Wawrzynczak
In order to support wake from D3cold, most devices require extra circuitry and possibly out-of-band communications to the host. Therefore, assume that most UARTs that do have wake capabilities support wake from D3hot rather than D3cold. BUG=b:187228954 TEST=compile Change-Id: I24d6d0e81d980fc9c910d8f47f557c88990b6400 Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/56834 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
2020-11-09acpi: Call acpi_fill_ssdt() only for enabled devicesKarthikeyan Ramasubramanian
Individual drivers check whether the concerned device is enabled before filling in the SSDT. Move the check before calling acpi_fill_ssdt() and remove the check in the individual drivers. BUG=None TEST=util/abuild/abuild Change-Id: Ib042bec7e8c68b38fafa60a8e965d781bddcd1f0 Signed-off-by: Karthikeyan Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/47148 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Sumeet R Pawnikar <sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Christian Walter <christian.walter@9elements.com>
2020-07-02acpi_device: Replace polarity with active_low in acpi_gpio for GpioIoFurquan Shaikh
As per ACPI spec, GpioIo does not have any polarity associated with it. Linux kernel uses `active_low` argument within GPIO _DSD property to allow BIOS to indicate if the corresponding GPIO should be treated as active low. Thus, if GPIO has active high polarity or if it does not have any polarity associated with it, then the `active_low` argument is supposed to be set to 0. Having a `polarity` field in acpi_gpio seems confusing because GPIOs might not always have polarity associated with them. Example, in case of DMIC-select GPIO where 0 means select DMIC0 and 1 means select DMIC1, there is no polarity associated with the GPIO. Thus, it would be clearer for mainboard to use macros without having to specify a particular polarity. In order to enable mainboards to provide GPIO information without polarity for GpioIo usage, this change also adds `ACPI_GPIO_OUTPUT` and `ACPI_GPIO_INPUT` macros. BUG=b:157603026 Change-Id: I39d2a6ac8f149a74afeb915812fece86c9b9ad93 Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42968 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2020-06-04drivers/uart/acpi: Add new device driver for UART attached devicesDuncan Laurie
This driver generates an ACPI device object for a UART attached device with all of the expected device support handlers like different interrupt sources and power control GPIOs. Example use: chip drivers/uart/acpi register "name" = ""UDEV"" register "desc" = ""UART Attached Device"" register "hid" = "ACPI_DT_NAMESPACE_HID" register "compat_string" = ""google,cros-ec-uart"" register "irq_gpio" = "ACPI_GPIO_IRQ_LEVEL_LOW_WAKE(GPP_C20)" register "uart" = "ACPI_UART_RAW_DEVICE(115200, 64)" device generic 0 on end end Resulting in this ACPI device: Device (UDEV) { Name (_HID, "PRP0001") Name (_UID, Zero) Name (_DDN, "UART Attached Device") Method (_STA, 0, NotSerialized) { Return (0x0F) } Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate () { UartSerialBusV2 (0x0001C200, DataBitsEight, StopBitsOne, 0x00, LittleEndian, ParityTypeNone, FlowControlNone, 0x0040, 0x0040, "\\_SB.PCI0.UAR2", 0x00, ResourceConsumer, , Exclusive) GpioInt (Level, ActiveLow, ExclusiveAndWake, PullDefault, 0x0000, "\\_SB.PCI0.GPIO", 0x00, ResourceConsumer) { 0x0114 } }) Name (_DSD, Package (0x02) { ToUUID ("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"), Package (0x01) { Package (0x02) { "compatible", "google,cros-ec-uart" } } }) } Change-Id: Idfd2d9d2ab6990a82ddd401734c0d9b1b0b8f82d Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41793 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>