| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Add support for a STM SPI TPM2 by adding checks for CR50.
Tested using ST33HTPH2E32.
Change-Id: I015497ca078979a44ba2b84e4995493de1f7247b
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39693
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
* Remove 2nd software stack in pc80 drivers directory.
* Create TSPI interface for common usage.
* Refactor TSS / TIS code base.
* Add vendor tss (Cr50) directory.
* Change kconfig options for TPM to TPM1.
* Add user / board configuration with:
* MAINBOARD_HAS_*_TPM # * BUS driver
* MAINBOARD_HAS_TPM1 or MAINBOARD_HAS_TPM2
* Add kconfig TPM user selection (e.g. pluggable TPMs)
* Fix existing headers and function calls.
* Fix vboot for interface usage and antirollback mode.
Change-Id: I7ec277e82a3c20c62a0548a1a2b013e6ce8f5b3f
Signed-off-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/24903
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
MAINBOARD_HAS_SPI_TPM_CR50 describes a capability of the board and SPI_TPM
is only on if we actually want to compile in the TPM code. For example,
in src/drivers/i2c/tpm/Kconfig MAINBOARD_HAS_I2C_TPM_CR50 also doesn't
depend on SPI_TPM.
This problem manifests itself as the following build issue when building
with MAINBOARD_HAS_I2C_TPM_CR50 but without an explict "select TPM2":
src/Kconfig:296:error: recursive dependency detected!
src/Kconfig:296: symbol MAINBOARD_HAS_TPM2 is selected by MAINBOARD_HAS_TPM_CR50
src/Kconfig:408: symbol MAINBOARD_HAS_TPM_CR50 depends on MAINBOARD_HAS_SPI_TPM_CR50
src/drivers/spi/tpm/Kconfig:15: symbol MAINBOARD_HAS_SPI_TPM_CR50 depends on SPI_TPM
src/drivers/spi/tpm/Kconfig:1: symbol SPI_TPM depends on TPM2
src/Kconfig:396: symbol TPM2 is selected by MAINBOARD_HAS_TPM2
MAINBOARD_HAS_SPI_TPM_CR50 shouldn't depend on SPI_TPM.
BRANCH=none
BUG=b:36786804
TEST=Boot rowan w/ serial enabled, verify coreboot and depthcharge are
configured to use IRQ flow control when talking to the Cr50 TPM.
Change-Id: I0cb3f6d3aa4159bad563a6a4b006d7f4825e04b4
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>
Suggested-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19411
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
In order to be able to use SPI TPM on x86, allow TPM_SPI to be used
with PC80_SYSTEM.
BUG=b:35583330
Change-Id: Ibe626a192d45cf2624368db42d369202a4003123
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19093
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Going forward it's important to note when a CR50 is expected
to be present in the system. Additionally, this Kconfig addition
provides symmetry with the equivalent i2c Kconfig option.
BUG=b:35775104
Change-Id: Ifbd42b8a22f407534b23459713558c77cde6935d
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18680
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Kconfig hex values don't need to be in quotes, and should start with
'0x'. If the default value isn't set this way, Kconfig will add the
0x to the start, and the entry can be added unnecessarily to the
defconfig since it's "different" than what was set by the default.
A check for this has been added to the Kconfig lint tool.
Change-Id: I86f37340682771700011b6285e4b4af41b7e9968
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/16834
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
To fully define TPM attachment to a SPI interface both bus and CS
(chip select) settings are required. Add the missing CS configuration
option.
BRANCH=none
BUG=chrome-os-partner:50645
TEST=with the rest of the patches applied it is possible to compile in
and run TPM2 SPI driver.
Change-Id: If297df8e5b9526f156ed1414eb9db317d6af5b33
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/353913
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15299
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@googlemail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Until now it was assumed that all TPM devices were of the same type
(TCG 1.2 spec compliant) and x86 based boards had LPC connected TPMs
and all other boards had I2C connected TPMs.
With the advent of TPM2 specification there is a need to be able to
configure different combinations of TPM types (TPM or TPM2) and
interfaces (LPC, I2C and SPI).
This patch allows to do it. Picking Chrome OS still assumes that the
board has a TPM device, but adding MAINBOARD_HAS_TPM2 to the board's
Kconfig will trigger including of TPM2 instead.
MAINBOARD_HAS_LPC_TPM forces the interface to be set to LPC, adding
SPI_TPM to the board config switches interface choice to SPI, and if
neither of the two is defined, the interface is assumed to be I2C.
BRANCH=none
BUG=chrome-os-partner:50645
TEST=verified that none of the generated board configurations change
as a result of this patch. With the rest of the stack in place it
is possible to configure different combinations of TPM types and
interfaces for ARM and x86 boards.
Change-Id: I24f2e3ee63636566bf2a867c51ed80a622672f07
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 5a25c1070560cd2734519f87dfbf401c135088d1
Original-Change-Id: I659e9301a4a4fe065ca6537ef1fa824a08d36321
Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/349850
Original-Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15294
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@googlemail.com>
|
