| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I926ec4c1c00339209ef656995031026935e52558
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/77637
Reviewed-by: Eric Lai <ericllai@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Change-Id: Ib8ee07aefdb32b8efe719f484e242b6129596842
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/75355
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
Since there are many identifiers whose name contain "__unused" in
headers of musl libc, introducing a macro which expands "__unused" to
the source of a util may have disastrous effect during its compiling
under a musl-based platform.
However, it is hard to detect musl at build time as musl is notorious
for having explicitly been refusing to add a macro like "__MUSL__" to
announce its own presence.
Using __always_unused and __maybe_unused for everything may be a good
idea. This is how it works in the Linux kernel, so that would at least
make us match some other standard rather than doing our own thing
(especially since the other compiler.h shorthand macros are also
inspired by Linux).
Signed-off-by: Bill XIE <persmule@hardenedlinux.org>
Change-Id: I547ae3371d7568f5aed732ceefe0130a339716a9
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/65717
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
These issues were found and fixed by codespell, a useful tool for
finding spelling errors.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin@coreboot.org>
Change-Id: I5b8ecdfe75d99028fee820a2034466a8ad1c5e63
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58080
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Coverity detects calling function spi_sdcard_do_command without checking
return value. Fix this issue by checking return value for error
handling.
Found-by: Coverity CID 1407737
TEST=None
Signed-off-by: John Zhao <john.zhao@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ie0d28806b5c0b4c6d509e583d115358864eeff80
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/45620
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I202e5d285612b9bf237b588ea3c006187623fdc3
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44609
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
|
|
Stefan thinks they don't add value.
Command used:
sed -i -e '/file is part of /d' $(git grep "file is part of " |egrep ":( */\*.*\*/\$|#|;#|-- | *\* )" | cut -d: -f1 |grep -v crossgcc |grep -v gcov | grep -v /elf.h |grep -v nvramtool)
The exceptions are for:
- crossgcc (patch file)
- gcov (imported from gcc)
- elf.h (imported from GNU's libc)
- nvramtool (more complicated header)
The removed lines are:
- fmt.Fprintln(f, "/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */")
-# This file is part of a set of unofficial pre-commit hooks available
-/* This file is part of coreboot */
-# This file is part of msrtool.
-/* This file is part of msrtool. */
- * This file is part of ncurses, designed to be appended after curses.h.in
-/* This file is part of pgtblgen. */
- * This file is part of the coreboot project.
- /* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-## This file is part of the coreboot project.
--- This file is part of the coreboot project.
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project */
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-;## This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project. It originated in the
- * This file is part of the coreinfo project.
-## This file is part of the coreinfo project.
- * This file is part of the depthcharge project.
-/* This file is part of the depthcharge project. */
-/* This file is part of the ectool project. */
- * This file is part of the GNU C Library.
- * This file is part of the libpayload project.
-## This file is part of the libpayload project.
-/* This file is part of the Linux kernel. */
-## This file is part of the superiotool project.
-/* This file is part of the superiotool project */
-/* This file is part of uio_usbdebug */
Change-Id: I82d872b3b337388c93d5f5bf704e9ee9e53ab3a9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41194
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now.
Change-Id: I38eaffa391ed5971217ffad74a312b1641e431c9
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40051
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I89b10076e0f4a4b3acd59160fb7abe349b228321
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39611
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Currently supports initialization, read, write, and erase operations.
Tested on HiFive Uneashed
implementation follows SD association's SPI access protocol, found
as doc http://t.cn/AiB8quFZ
Change-Id: I464d2334b8227e448c1c7e324c0455023cffb72a
Signed-off-by: Xiang Wang <merle@hardenedlinux.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35118
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
