| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Add const qualifier to first argument.
Change-Id: I6655e04401b6a7aa5cafb717ff6f46b80b96646e
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32703
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
|
|
Add API that should be implemented by the boot media drivers
for write-protecting a subregion.
Change-Id: I4c9376e2c2c7a4852f13c65824c6cd64a1c6ac0a
Signed-off-by: Rizwan Qureshi <rizwan.qureshi@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/28724
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
|
|
Instead of making all SPI drivers allocate space for a spi_flash
structure and fill it in, udpate the API to allow callers to pass in a
spi_flash structure that can be filled by the flash drivers as
required. This also cleans up the interface so that the callers can
maintain and free the space for spi_flash structure as required.
BUG=b:38330715
Change-Id: If6f1b403731466525c4690777d9b32ce778eb563
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19705
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
The MRC cache wants to be able to access the SPI flash boot device.
Allow an easy way to provide that so that there isn't duplicate
spi_flash objects representing the same device.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:56151
Change-Id: Iba92e8bb8a6060cdd327b10f5f8ec23ac61101e7
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/17715
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
RW flag was added to spi_slave structure to get around a requirement on
some AMD flash controllers that need to group together all spi volatile
operations (write/erase). This rw flag is not a property or attribute of
the SPI slave or controller. Thus, instead of saving it in spi_slave
structure, clean up the SPI flash driver interface. This allows
chipsets/mainboards (that require volatile operations to be grouped) to
indicate beginning and end of such grouped operations.
New user APIs are added to allow users to perform probe, read, write,
erase, volatile group begin and end operations. Callbacks defined in
spi_flash structure are expected to be used only by the SPI flash
driver. Any chipset that requires grouping of volatile operations can
select the newly added Kconfig option SPI_FLASH_HAS_VOLATILE_GROUP and
define callbacks for chipset_volatile_group_{begin,end}.
spi_claim_bus/spi_release_bus calls have been removed from the SPI flash
chip drivers which end up calling do_spi_flash_cmd since it already has
required calls for claiming and releasing SPI bus before performing a
read/write operation.
BUG=None
BRANCH=None
TEST=Compiles successfully.
Change-Id: Idfc052e82ec15b6c9fa874cee7a61bd06e923fbf
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/17462
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
The SPI drivers for the various chipsets are not consistent in
their handling of when they are accessible. Coupled with the
unknown ordering of boot_device_init() being called this can
lead to unexpected behavior (probing failures or hangs). Instead
move the act of initializing the SPI flash boot device to when
the various infrastructure requires its usage when it calls
boot_device_rw(). Those platforms utilizing the RW boot device
would need to ensure their SPI drivers are functional and
ready when the call happens.
This further removes any other systems failing to boot as
reported in https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/67.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:56151
Change-Id: Ib3bddf5e26bf5322f3dd20345eeef6bee40f0f66
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/16300
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
|
|
It's necessary to call spi_init() prior to calling spi_flash_probe()
such that the SPI drivers can do any work required prior to performing
SPI transactions. It could be argued that the drivers should handle
such situations, however the SPI API implementations seem to assume the
callers ensured spi_init() was called before any SPI transactions.
This fixes systems that failed to boot introduced by [1]. Issue tracked
in https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/67.
[1] I2aa75f88409309e3f9b9bd79b52d27c0061139c8
https://review.coreboot.org/16200
BUG=chrome-os-partner:56151
Change-Id: I2d8d5ac685833521f1efe212b07a4b61ba0d9bc3
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/16297
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@googlemail.com>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
|
|
On many x86 platforms the boot device is SPI which is memory
mapped. However, in order to write to the boot device one needs
to use the SPI api. Therefore, provide a common implementation
of boot_device_rw() which has no mmap() functionality. It only
reads, writes, and erases. This will be used in the existing
infrastructure but in a SPI agnostic way.
Two options are added:
1. BOOT_DEVICE_SPI_FLASH_RW_NOMMAP
2. BOOT_DEVICE_SPI_FLASH_RW_NOMMAP_EARLY
The former is auto-selected when COMMON_CBFS_SPI_WRAPPER is not
selected. The latter can be used to include the implementation
in the early stages such as bootblock, verstage, and romstage.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:56151
Change-Id: I2aa75f88409309e3f9b9bd79b52d27c0061139c8
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/16200
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
