aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/drivers/spi/amic.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2016-12-06spi_flash: Make a deep copy of spi_slave structureFurquan Shaikh
Commit 36b81af (spi: Pass pointer to spi_slave structure in spi_setup_slave) changes the way spi_setup_slave handles the spi_slave structure. Instead of expecting spi controller drivers to maintain spi_slave structure in CAR_GLOBAL/data section, caller is expected to manage the spi_slave structure. This requires that spi_flash drivers maintain spi_slave structure and flash probe function needs to make a copy of the passed in spi_slave structure. This change fixes the regression on Lenovo X230 and other mainboards. Change-Id: I0ad971eecaf3bfe301e9f95badc043193cc27cab Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/17728 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Iru Cai <mytbk920423@gmail.com>
2016-11-22spi: Clean up SPI flash driver interfaceFurquan Shaikh
RW flag was added to spi_slave structure to get around a requirement on some AMD flash controllers that need to group together all spi volatile operations (write/erase). This rw flag is not a property or attribute of the SPI slave or controller. Thus, instead of saving it in spi_slave structure, clean up the SPI flash driver interface. This allows chipsets/mainboards (that require volatile operations to be grouped) to indicate beginning and end of such grouped operations. New user APIs are added to allow users to perform probe, read, write, erase, volatile group begin and end operations. Callbacks defined in spi_flash structure are expected to be used only by the SPI flash driver. Any chipset that requires grouping of volatile operations can select the newly added Kconfig option SPI_FLASH_HAS_VOLATILE_GROUP and define callbacks for chipset_volatile_group_{begin,end}. spi_claim_bus/spi_release_bus calls have been removed from the SPI flash chip drivers which end up calling do_spi_flash_cmd since it already has required calls for claiming and releasing SPI bus before performing a read/write operation. BUG=None BRANCH=None TEST=Compiles successfully. Change-Id: Idfc052e82ec15b6c9fa874cee7a61bd06e923fbf Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/17462 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2015-04-17drivers/spi: Pass flash parameters from coreboot to payloadDan Ehrenberg
A payload may want to run erase operations on SPI NOR flash without re-probing the device to get its properties. This patch passes up three properties of flash to achieve that: - The size of the flash device - The sector size, i.e., the granularity of erase - The command used for erase The patch sends the parameters through coreboot and then libpayload. The patch also includes a minor refactoring of the flash erase code. Parameters are sent up for just one flash device. If multiple SPI flash devices are probed, the second one will "win" and its parameters will be sent up to the payload. TEST=Observed parameters to be passed up to depthcharge through libpayload and be used to correctly initialize flash and do an erase. TEST=Winbond and Gigadevices spi flash drivers compile with the changes; others don't, for seemingly unrelated reasons. BRANCH=none BUG=chromium:446377 Change-Id: Ib8be86494b5a3d1cfe1d23d3492e3b5cba5f99c6 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 988c8c68bbfcdfa69d497ea5f806567bc80f8126 Original-Change-Id: Ie2b3a7f5b6e016d212f4f9bac3fabd80daf2ce72 Original-Signed-off-by: Dan Ehrenberg <dehrenberg@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/239570 Original-Reviewed-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9726 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-07-17drivers/spi: Sanitize headers from preprocessor abuseEdward O'Callaghan
Continuing on from the rational given in: a173a62 Remove guarding #includes by CONFIG_FOO combinations Change-Id: I35c636ee7c0b106323b3e4b90629f7262750f8bd Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6114 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
2014-07-14SPI: Split writes using spi_crop_chunk()Kyösti Mälkki
SPI controllers in Intel and AMD bridges have a slightly different restriction on how long transactions they can handle. Change-Id: I3d149d4b7e7e9633482a153d5e380a86c553d871 Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6163 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
2014-07-14SPI flash: Fix alignment checks in Page Program commandsKyösti Mälkki
There are two separate restrictions to take into account: Page Program command must not cross address boundaries defined by the flash part's page size. Total number of bytes for any command sent to flash part is restricted by the SPI controller capabilities. Consider CONTROLLER_PAGE_LIMIT=64, page_size=256, offset=62, len=4. This write would be split at offset 64 for no reason. Consider CONTROLLER_PAGE_LIMIT=40, page_size=256, offset=254, len=4. This write would not be split at page boundary as required. We do not really hit the second case. Nevertheless, CONTROLLER_PAGE_LIMIT is a misnomer for the maximum payload length supported by the SPI controller and is removed in a followup. Change-Id: I727f2e7de86a91b6a509460ff1f374acd006a0bc Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6162 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
2014-02-17src/drivers/spi: introduce AMIC supportIdwer Vollering
Add support for the AMIC A25L032 flash chip. Change-Id: Ie8d441a923c6fbd18c16440b4571321652d934d5 Signed-off-by: Idwer Vollering <vidwer@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5252 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>