Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
port is allocated in ACPI, without checking for value.
Don't use port value when zero.
BUG=N/A
TEST=Portwell PQ-M107
Change-Id: Ia44281b82d003b29bffbf985b774ddd661b65c4e
Signed-off-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29331
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I6c77f4289b46646872731ef9c20dc115f0cf876d
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29161
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
SLB9665 are not initialized correctly. It looks like SLB9665 and SLB9660
return the same DEV ID. Initialize these devices according to TPM Kconfig
selections.
Tested on apu2 with following change:
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/coreboot/+/28000/
Change-Id: Ic20b9a65ef6a4ee392a9352f7c9bf01b2496f482
Signed-off-by: Kamil Wcislo <kamil.wcislo@3mdeb.com>
Signed-off-by: Michał Żygowski <michal.zygowski@3mdeb.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/21983
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I9144937b72a98517cbd41c093cff7bad543b4140
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27916
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Ic1c9b1edd8d3206a68854107ddcbc5c51cb487c3
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27404
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Had 0x2e hardcoded, which is often the SuperIO chip. Instead,
pull the port from the PNP tree generated from devicetree.cb,
where either 0x4e or 0x2e will be specified.
Change-Id: I4a92693f8acd3a1618cefcdf6b25eb22a727e20f
Signed-off-by: Kevin Cody-Little <kcodyjr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/26203
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
|
|
Certain TPMs (observed on Infineon SLB9635 installed on revolve 810 g1)
seem to need some delay between tis_wait_valid() and
tis_has_valid_data(), or tis_has_valid_data() may invalidly return 0,
ending the loop immaturely with some bytes left unread, and fail to
pass the check below, causing the current command not finalized by
tis_command_ready(), and blocking any later tis_wait_ready().
This time the added delay is controlled by a Kconfig option
TPM_RDRESP_NEED_DELAY.
Change-Id: Ic2a2f252e72a0bbce51e2863f8e46647b1570ba5
Signed-off-by: Bill XIE <persmule@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25322
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
* Rename tlcl* to tss* as tpm software stack layer.
* Fix inconsistent naming.
Change-Id: I206dd6a32dbd303a6d4d987e424407ebf5c518fa
Signed-off-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/22104
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|