| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-10-12 | gma ACPI: Do not overwrite backlight configuration | Nico Huber | |
| Changes to CR1 and CR2 were effectively overwriting the backlight configuration from the devicetree with static values. Instead read the maximum brightness value from BCLM (backlight modulation frequency) and calculate the target level (Arg0 is the target level as percentage). Turned out that _BQC has to return a value from the list returned by _BCL. So XBQC got a little heavier to search for the correct value. Change-Id: I35419993c8250c95fc69ba4db30db9dba9e6f8ff Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.huber@secunet.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11704 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com> | |||
| 2015-10-12 | gma ACPI: Consolidate non-PCH and PCH brightness levels | Nico Huber | |
| The two cases only differ in the register locations. As the values in BRIG were all the same, consolidate them. They also got normalized to percentages as the ACPI spec wants that (0x61 was 100% before). Change-Id: I9216a953bb89458ed102c39194ea370cbf463d5e Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.huber@secunet.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11703 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com> | |||
 |
index : coreboot.git | |
| my copy of coreboot | gitea |
| aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff |