| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Providing an explicit no-op function pointer is only necessary for
`.read_resources` and `.set_resources`. All other device-operation
pointers are optional and can be NULL.
Change-Id: I3d139f7be86180558cabec04b8566873062e33be
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40206
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now.
Change-Id: I38eaffa391ed5971217ffad74a312b1641e431c9
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40051
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
These two identifiers were always very confusing. We're not filling and
injecting generators. We are filling SSDTs and injecting into the DSDT.
So drop the `_generator` suffix. Hopefully, this also makes ACPI look a
little less scary.
Change-Id: I6f0e79632c9c855f38fe24c0186388a25990c44d
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.huber@secunet.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39977
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-by: David Guckian
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I89b10076e0f4a4b3acd59160fb7abe349b228321
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39611
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
RT1011 is a smart amplifier. It needs to know speaker related parameters
including speaker resistor value and temperature when the calibration is
done in order to run Dynamic Speaker Management (DSM) algorithm on chip.
The purpose of DSM is to protect speaker when the volume is large.
The calibration data of speaker is stored in VPD in factory.
This driver is needed to read data from VPD and write to ACPI _DSD when
config CHROMEOS_DSM_CALIB is turned on.
Kernel rt1011 codec driver will read these device properties to set up
codec accordingly on boot.
The reason to prepare these parameters in coreboot is because kernel
codec driver expects to read per-device parameters directly from device
properties. Another benefit is that other OS can also take these
parameters through ACPI _DSD table and take benefit of DSM on RT1011.
The kernel driver device properties of RT1011 are documented at
linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rt1011.txt
It is currently in ASoC maintainer's tree at
https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound/+/for-next/
and hopefully should be merged to mainline kernel in the next merge window.
BUG=b:140397934
BRANCH=none
TEST=On Helios, with patch series, check realtek,r0_calib and
realtek,temperature_calib are available to rt1011 codec driver.
Signed-off-by: Cheng-Yi Chiang <cychiang@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I9550b9890ce2cae787f4f17779a5ade77f619171
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36029
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
