Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Change-Id: Ib96bf7d48711f518e36f8d12244b5749d84a0f68
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/30203
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ic1c9b1edd8d3206a68854107ddcbc5c51cb487c3
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27404
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
We don't need another level of indirection for these
hardware accesses.
Change-Id: Ic567d8272e5dd943ce19babbd7ad57ba5d86c354
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20580
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I37763a59d2546cd0c0e57b31fdb7aa77c2c50bee
Signed-off-by: Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11937
Reviewed-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|