| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The Exynos family and most ARM products are SoC, not just CPU.
We used to put ARM code in src/cpu to avoid polluting the code base for what was
essentially an experiment at the time. Now that it's past the experimental phase
and we're going to see more SoCs (including intel/baytrail) in coreboot.
Change-Id: I5ea1f822664244edf5f77087bc8018d7c535f81c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/170891
Tested-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit c8bb8fe0b20be37465f93c738d80e7e43033670a)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6739
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
All this samsung_get_base_address_of_device_with_a_really_long_name()
boilerplate makes my eyes bleed... I think there are so much cleaner
ways to do this. Unfortunately changing this ends up touching nearly
every Exynos5 file, but I hope you agree that it's worth it (and the
sooner we get it over with, the better... I can't bring myself to make
another device fit into that ugly scheme).
This also removes the redundant EXYNOS5 base address definitions from
the 5420 directory when there are EXYNOS5420 ones, to avoid complete
confusion. The new scheme tries to use EXYNOS5 for base addresses and
exynos5 for types that are common between the two processors, and
EXYNOS5420/exynos5420 for things that have changes (although I probably
didn't catch all differences).
Change-Id: I87e58434490ed55a9bbe743af1f9bf2520dec13f
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/167579
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: ron minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 66c87693352c248eec029c1ce83fb295059e6b5b)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6632
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Shorten a few delays, and make some delays shorter but let the
loops have a higher termination count (i.e. give it the same
amount of time to warm up, but check more frequently).
Change-Id: Id9fe846ae3a8d792b14d62aea4e98d8aad05be43
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/66156
Commit-Queue: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit a112e77f2f21f41f982ca22bebdac213cc8d233a)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6506
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
|
|
This includes the new dp code, which is better, and the fimd code,
which is changed and improved. We took the chance to remove un-needed
files, and also to remove some foolish u-boot habits, but not all of
them. That will take time.
With these changes we get graphics.
Since the only mainboards we have with 16 bit graphics are 5:6:5,
adjust edid.c to just use that format. If at some future time we need
4:4:4, which seems unlikely, we'll need to add a function to adjust
the lb_framebuffer. Note that you can't just divine this from the EDID,
as the graphics pipe format need not match the actual final format used.
The EDID reading works. We've been requested to support hard-coded
EDIDs and that will come in the next revision. Currently the hard-coded
EDID is ignored for testing.
Change-Id: Ib4d06dc3388ab90c834f94808a51133e5b515a4d
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/64240
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Tested-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4432
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
This change creates an exynos5420 directory with code that will eventually
implement support for the exynos5420 cpu from Samsung. Currently it's a copy
of the exynos5250 directory with the name changed. There are going to be some
problems where headers in src/cpu/samsung/exynos-common include headers in the
exynos5250 directory directly.
Change-Id: Ia8d7244310d32499238bbc171c0c668ec48178e1
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3644
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
