aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/cpu/samsung/exynos5250/cpu.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2014-08-26armv7: Move Exynos from 'cpu' to 'soc'.Hung-Te Lin
The Exynos family and most ARM products are SoC, not just CPU. We used to put ARM code in src/cpu to avoid polluting the code base for what was essentially an experiment at the time. Now that it's past the experimental phase and we're going to see more SoCs (including intel/baytrail) in coreboot. Change-Id: I5ea1f822664244edf5f77087bc8018d7c535f81c Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/170891 Tested-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit c8bb8fe0b20be37465f93c738d80e7e43033670a) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6739 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2014-08-18trustzone: Pull trustzone init out of cpu.c and do it in romstage.Gabe Black
Trustzone needs to be initialized/disabled both on boot and on wake, so it needs to be done before ramstage which doesn't run on wake. cpu.c isn't compiled into romstage and fixing that causes other problems, so the trustzone functions were split out. Change-Id: I8fc630237ebec1f02a91600f8baf3d4e9ea66d0e Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/169817 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 055ed0e28476123b0bd666109af90baf40aadcee) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6666 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2014-08-18exynos5: Implement support for USB 3.0 DRD PHYs/controllersJulius Werner
This patch adds support for the DesignWare3 USB 3.0 DRD controller and PHY to the Exynos5250 and Exynos5420 CPUs. It also adds code to the Google Snow and Pit boards to turn these controllers on where applicable. Change-Id: Idcca627363a69f1d65402e1acb9a62b439f077ff Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/169452 Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> (cherry picked from commit e9809ae12ef8b8bd6cd61d3f604cb9e4718cf7eb) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6642 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2014-08-14exynos5: Refactor crazy old U-Boot base address macros awayJulius Werner
All this samsung_get_base_address_of_device_with_a_really_long_name() boilerplate makes my eyes bleed... I think there are so much cleaner ways to do this. Unfortunately changing this ends up touching nearly every Exynos5 file, but I hope you agree that it's worth it (and the sooner we get it over with, the better... I can't bring myself to make another device fit into that ugly scheme). This also removes the redundant EXYNOS5 base address definitions from the 5420 directory when there are EXYNOS5420 ones, to avoid complete confusion. The new scheme tries to use EXYNOS5 for base addresses and exynos5 for types that are common between the two processors, and EXYNOS5420/exynos5420 for things that have changes (although I probably didn't catch all differences). Change-Id: I87e58434490ed55a9bbe743af1f9bf2520dec13f Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/167579 Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: ron minnich <rminnich@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 66c87693352c248eec029c1ce83fb295059e6b5b) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6632 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
2014-08-12exynos5: Refactor board-specific parts out of USB PHY codeJulius Werner
This patch moves around some of the existing Exynos5 USB 2.0 PHY code to make it cleaner in preparation of the 3.0 PHYs. It moves the VBUS GPIOs (which are completely board-specific) into the mainboard code and makes sure to only initialize PHYs on the boards that actually need them. It also removes the USB 3.0 PLL hack that was needed on Snow from the Pit and Kirby boards (which do not have that PLL anymore). Change-Id: Ia35f47a765acff60481f0907f7448ec4f78e0937 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/66887 Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> (cherry picked from commit c3b1a8b687b535f4d5ac1b3bd2a4760151698fdb) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6609 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-12-21exynos5250: Implement support to boot with USB A-A firmware uploadJulius Werner
This patch implements the basic infrastructure required to use the USB A-A firmware upload feature on Exynos5 processors with Coreboot. It will require a corresponding host-side script that activates the feature and uploads the correct image parts in the correct order to harcoded target addresses, as described in the comments of alternate_cbfs.c. Also fixes a bug in the Google Snow mainboard where it would not correctly initialize the pinmux configuration for the SPI flash bus. During a normal SPI boot the IROM would already do that for you, but when booting from USB you have to do it yourself. Change-Id: I40a39f8f5d1d70b58dbf258015c1653a27097d67 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/64875 Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4456 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
2013-12-21Snow: correctly disable trust zone hardwareRonald G. Minnich
The kernel assumes that trust zone is disabled. Change-Id: Ia8d6fa69adcb812a747d8b89eb77e57144423eaa Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/64722 Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org> Tested-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4431 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
2013-12-21Exynos 5250: Enable dynamic CBMEMStefan Reinauer
... In order to do this, the graphics memory has to move into the resource allocator and out of CBMEM. Change-Id: I7396da4a7068404b0d2e4d308becab4dd6ea59bb Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/59326 Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4390 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
2013-12-21exynos5250: Get rid of the PWM timer code we shouldn't be using anymoreGabe Black
This code was left over from U-Boot and was superceded by the MCT. Change-Id: Ia85e3b7281dcdd4740238dddd0dfc6f0ba2c94da Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/63778 Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4401 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
2013-07-10ARMv7: De-uboot-ify Exynos5250 GPIO codeStefan Reinauer
The Exynos GPIO code has three different APIs that, unfortunately, were widely used throughout the code base. This patch is cleaning up the mess. Change-Id: I09ccc7819fb892dbace9693c786dacc62f3f8eac Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3643 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-07-10ARMv7: De-uboot-ify Exynos5250 codeStefan Reinauer
When starting the Exynos5250 port, a lot of unneeded u-boot code was imported. This is an attempt to get rid of a lot of unneeded code before the port is used as a basis for further ARM ports. There is a lot more that can be done, including cleaning up the 5250's Kconfig file. Change-Id: I2d88676c436eea4b21bcb62f40018af9fabb3016 Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3642 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-07-10samsung/exynos5250: unify codeStefan Reinauer
It turns out that the exynos5-common code previously imported from u-boot is not common code at all but very specific to the 5250 and not compatible with the 5450. Hence, unify the directories exynos5250 and exynos5-common. We will try to factor out common code while progressing with the 5450 port. Change-Id: Iab595e66fcd01eda8365c96fb8bef896f7602f03 Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3641 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-04-19[2/3] exynos5: modify thermal management unit code for corebootDavid Hendricks
This updates the Exynos TMU code for coreboot: - Remove dependency on device tree - Add Makefile entries Change-Id: I55e1b624d7c7b695b1253ec55f6ae3de8dc671bc Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3107 Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-03-29exynos5250: Add function for configuring L2 cacheDavid Hendricks
This adds a new function to configure L2 cache for the exynos5250 and deprecates the old function. Change-Id: I9562f3301aa1e2911dae3856ab57bb6beec2e224 Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2949 Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-03-04ARM: remove code that is IMHO a dangerous designRonald G. Minnich
OK, this is tl;dr. But I need to write this in hopes we make sure we don't put code like this into coreboot. Ever. Our excuse in this case is that it was imported, not obviously wrong, and easily changed. It made sense to get it in, make it work, then do a cleanup pass, because changing everything up front is almost impossible to debug. The exynos code has bunch of base register values, e.g. These are base addresses of things that look like a memory-mapped struct. To get these to a pointer, they created the following macro, which creates an inline function. static inline unsigned int samsung_get_base_##device(void) \ { \ return cpu_is_exynos5() ? EXYNOS5_##base : 0; \ } And then invoke it 31 times in a .h file, e.g.: SAMSUNG_BASE(clock, CLOCK_BASE) to create 31 functions. And then use it: struct exynos5_clock *clk = (struct exynos5_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock(); OK, what's wrong with this? It's easier to ask what's right with it. Answer: nothing. I have a long list of what's wrong, and I may leave some things out, but here goes: 1. the "function" can return a NULL if we're not on exynos5. Most uses of the code don't check the return value. 2. And why would this function be running, if we're not on an exynos5? Why compile it in? 3. Note the cast everywhere a samsung_get_base_xxx is used. The function returns an untyped variable, requiring the *user* to get two things right: the cast, and the function invocation. One can replace that _clock(); with _power(); in the code above, and they will be referencing the wrong registers, and they'll never get an error! We have a C compiler; use it to type data. 4. You're generating 31 functions using cpp each and every time the file is included. The C compiler has to parse these each time. It's not at all like a simple cpp macro which is only generated on use. 5. You can't tags or etags this code 6. In fact, any kind of analysis tool will be unable to do anything with this cpp magic. That's only a partial list. So what's the right way to do it? Just make typed constants, viz: Or, since I expect people will want the lower case function syntax, I've left it that way: Now we've got something that is efficient, and we don't even need to protect with any more. Hence this change. We've got something that is type checked, does not require users to cast on each use, will catch simple programming errors, can be analyzed with standard tools, and builds faster. So if we make a mistake: struct exynos5_clock *clk = samsung_get_base_adc(); We'll see it: src/cpu/samsung/exynos5250/clock.c: In function 'get_pll_clk': src/cpu/samsung/exynos5250/clock.c:183:3: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror] which we would not have seen before. As a minor benefit, it shaves most of a second off the compilation. Change-Id: Ie67bc4bc038a8dd1837b977d07332d7d7fd6be1f Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2582 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-02-03exynos5250: remove CPU check from samsung_get_base_* macroDavid Hendricks
The cpu_is_exynos5() macro seems broken at the moment, so skip it. The macro is superfluous and will probably be replaced eventually, but at least this will un-break usage sites. Change-Id: Ibd360cbfa18047ad8a3488d4f24c3fc4d7415eba Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2264 Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-01-05ARMv7: drop __ASSEMBLY__Stefan Reinauer
We moved to using __ASSEMBLER__ years ago since it is set by as. Change-Id: I60103ba23ebe87be1d0bc63beed0ef5b05eed4f2 Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2111 Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2012-11-29Minor changes to .h files for samsung ARM partRonald G. Minnich
With these changes we have a mostly compiling target. I'm still removing and pruning .h files, but hopefully later today I'll do the last few .h commits and move on to .c Change-Id: Ia82d787496184e028f37d7b67336d61fda75aa94 Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1937 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-11-28Add .h files for samsung exynos 5250Ronald G. Minnich
Per a conversation with Stefan, these chip-dependent files are moved to the src tree, in the manner of other chips (north and southbridge). Change-Id: I12645ba05eb241eda200ed06cb633541a6a98119 Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1925 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)