summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/cpu/intel/microcode/microcode.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2017-03-16cpu/intel: Wrap lines at 80 columnsLee Leahy
Fix the following warning detected by checkpatch.pl: WARNING: line over 80 characters TEST=Build and run on Galileo Gen2 Change-Id: I74f25da5c53bd518189ce86817d6e3385b29c3b4 Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18850 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
2017-03-16cpu/intel: Fix the spacing issuesLee Leahy
Fix the following errors and warnings detected by checkpatch.pl: ERROR: spaces required around that '=' (ctx:VxV) ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV) ERROR: space prohibited after that open parenthesis '(' ERROR: space prohibited before that close parenthesis ')' ERROR: need consistent spacing around '-' (ctx:WxV) ERROR: spaces required around that '>' (ctx:VxV) ERROR: need consistent spacing around '>>' (ctx:WxV) ERROR: need consistent spacing around '<<' (ctx:VxW) ERROR: spaces required around that '||' (ctx:VxV) ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" ERROR: "(foo*)" should be "(foo *)" WARNING: space prohibited between function name and open parenthesis '(' WARNING: storage class should be at the beginning of the declaration TEST=Build and run on Galileo Gen2 Change-Id: I6602fbc8602171ab6c2f3b6c204558ad2c811179 Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18847 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
2016-08-28src/cpu: Add required space before opening parenthesis '('Elyes HAOUAS
Change-Id: I7fb9bfcaeec0b9dfd0695d2b2d398fd01091f6bc Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/16286 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Omar Pakker
2016-08-28src/cpu: Remove unnecessary whitespace before "\n"Elyes HAOUAS
Change-Id: Iebdcc659bf2a3e738702c85ee86dbb71b504721a Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/16279 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Omar Pakker Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
2016-02-10cpu/intel/microcode: allow microcode to be loaded in romstageAaron Durbin
The previous usage of the intel microcode support supported using the library under ROMCC and ramstage. Allow for microcode support to be used in normal C-based romstage as well by: 1. Only using walkcbfs when ROMCC is defined. 2. Only using spinlocks if !__PRE_RAM__ The header file now unconditionally exposes the declarations of the supporting functions. Change-Id: I903578bcb4422b4c050903c53b60372b64b79af1 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/13611 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
2015-10-31tree: drop last paragraph of GPL copyright headerPatrick Georgi
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address. Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we imported) looks out for that. This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further editing. Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2015-07-29Add SoC specific microcode update check in ramstageRizwan Qureshi
Some Intel SoCs which support SGX feature, report the microcode patch revision one less than the actual revision. This results in the same microcode patch getting loaded again. Add a SoC specific check to avoid reloading the same patch. BUG=chrome-os-partner:42046 BRANCH=None TEST=Built for glados and tested on RVP3 CQ-DEPEND=CL:286054 Change-Id: Iab4c34c6c55119045947f598e89352867c67dcb8 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: ab2ed73db3581cd432f9bc84acca47f5e53a0e9b Original-Change-Id: I4f7bf9c841e5800668208c11b0afcf8dba48a775 Original-Signed-off-by: Rizwan Qureshi <rizwan.qureshi@intel.com> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/287513 Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11055 Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2015-06-02cbfs: new API and better program loadingAaron Durbin
A new CBFS API is introduced to allow making CBFS access easier for providing multiple CBFS sources. That is achieved by decoupling the cbfs source from a CBFS file. A CBFS source is described by a descriptor. It contains the necessary properties for walking a CBFS to locate a file. The CBFS file is then decoupled from the CBFS descriptor in that it's no longer needed to access the contents of the file. All of this is accomplished using the regions infrastructure by repsenting CBFS sources and files as region_devices. Because region_devices can be chained together forming subregions this allows one to decouple a CBFS source from a file. This also allows one to provide CBFS files that came from other sources for payload and/or stage loading. The program loading takes advantage of those very properties by allowing multiple sources for locating a program. Because of this we can reduce the overhead of loading programs because it's all done in the common code paths. Only locating the program is per source. Change-Id: I339b84fce95f03d1dbb63a0f54a26be5eb07f7c8 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9134 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2015-05-21Remove address from GPLv2 headersPatrick Georgi
As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons but because there are tools that look for them, and giving them a standard pattern simplifies things. However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a new lease, but can drop the address instead. util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that we may want to synchronize every now and then. $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, *MA[, ]*02110-1301[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]*Suite 330, Boston, MA *02111-1307[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -a \! -name \*.patch \ -a \! -name \*_shipped \ -a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \ -a \! -name LGPL.txt \ -a \! -name COPYING \ -a \! -name DISCLAIMER \ -exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
2014-01-28intel: fix microcode compilation failure in bootblockAaron Durbin
When not building with CONFIG_SSE there are not enough registers for ROMCC to use for spilling. The previous changes to this file had too many local variables that needed to be tracked -- thus causing romcc compilation issues. Change-Id: I3dd4b48be707f41ce273285e98ebd397c32a6a25 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4845 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
2014-01-16cpu/intel: Make all Intel CPUs load microcode from CBFSAlexandru Gagniuc
The sequence to inject microcode updates is virtually the same for all Intel CPUs. The same function is used to inject the update in both CBFS and hardcoded cases, and in both of these cases, the microcode resides in the ROM. This should be a safe change across the board. The function which loaded compiled-in microcode is also removed here in order to prevent it from being used in the future. The dummy terminators from microcode need to be removed if this change is to work when generating microcode from several microcode_blob.c files, as is the case for older socketed CPUs. Removal of dummy terminators is done in a subsequent patch. Change-Id: I2cc8220cc4cd4a87aa7fc750e6c60ccdfa9986e9 Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4495 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@gmail.com>
2013-12-17cpu/intel: Do not rely on CBFS microcode having a terminatorAlexandru Gagniuc
Up until now, a dummy terminator was required for CBFS microcode files. This was a coreboot only requirement in order to terminate the loop which searches for updates. Figure out where the microcode file ends, and exit the loop if we pass the end of the CBFS without finding any updates. Change-Id: Ib61247e83ae6b67b27fcd61bd40241d4cd7bd246 Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4505 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
2013-12-13cpu: Rename CPU_MICROCODE_IN_CBFS to SUPPORT_CPU_UCODE_IN_CBFSAlexandru Gagniuc
CPU_MICROCODE_IN_CBFS was designed to mean that loading microcode updates from a CBFS file is supported, however, the name implies that microcode is present in CBFS. This has recently caused confusion both with contributions from Google, as well as SAGE. Rename this option to SUPPORT_CPU_UCODE_IN_CBFS in order to make it clearer that what is meant is "hey, the code we have for this CPU supports loading microcode updates from CBFS", and prevent further confusion. Change-Id: I394555f690b5ab4cac6fbd3ddbcb740ab1138339 Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4482 Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-04-23Intel microcode: Return when `microcode_updates` is `NULL`Vladimir Serbinenko
Add a safety check in function `intel_update_microcode` to return when accidentally `NULL` is passed as `microcode_updates`, which would lead to a null pointer dereference later on. for (c = microcode_updates; m->hdrver; m = (const struct microcode *)c) { While at it, use `return NULL` for clarity in function `intel_microcode_find` and include the header file `stddef.h`. for it. The review of this patch had some more discussion on adding more comments and more detailed error messages. But this should be done in a separate patch. For clarity here some history, on how this was found and what caused the discussion and confusion. Originally when Vladimir made this improvement, selecting `CPU_MICROCODE_IN_CBFS` in Kconfig but not having the microcode blob `cpu_microcode_blob.bin` in CBFS resulted in a null pointer dereference later on causing a crash. for (c = microcode_updates; m->hdrver; m = (const struct microcode *)c) { Vladimir fixed this by returning if `microcode_updates` is `NULL`, that means no file is found and successfully tested this on his Lenovo X201. When pushing the patch to Gerrit for review, the code was rewritten though by Aaron in commit »intel microcode: split up microcode loading stages« (98ffb426) [1], which also returns when no file is found. So the other parts of the code were checked and the safety check as described above is added. [1] http://review.coreboot.org/2778 Change-Id: I6e18fd37256910bf047061e4633a66cf29ad7b69 Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2990 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-03-19intel microcode: split up microcode loading stagesAaron Durbin
This patch only applies to CONFIG_MICROCODE_IN_CBFS. The intel microcode update routine would always walk the CBFS for the microcode file. Then it would loop through the whole file looking for a match then load the microcode. This process was maintained for intel_update_microcode_from_cbfs(), however 2 new functions were exported: 1. const void *intel_microcode_find(void) 2. void intel_microcode_load_unlocked(const void *microcode_patch) The first locates a matching microcode while the second loads that mircocode. These new functions can then be used to cache the found microcode blob w/o having to re-walk the CBFS. Booted baskingridge board to Linux and noted that all microcode revisions match on all the CPUs. Change-Id: Ifde3f3e5c100911c4f984dd56d36664a8acdf7d5 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2778 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-01-30Extend CBFS to support arbitrary ROM source media.Hung-Te Lin
Summary: Isolate CBFS underlying I/O to board/arch-specific implementations as "media stream", to allow loading and booting romstage on non-x86. CBFS functions now all take a new "media source" parameter; use CBFS_DEFAULT_MEDIA if you simply want to load from main firmware. API Changes: cbfs_find => cbfs_get_file. cbfs_find_file => cbfs_get_file_content. cbfs_get_file => cbfs_get_file_content with correct type. CBFS used to work only on memory-mapped ROM (all x86). For platforms like ARM, the ROM may come from USB, UART, or SPI -- any serial devices and not available for memory mapping. To support these devices (and allowing CBFS to read from multiple source at the same time), CBFS operations are now virtual-ized into "cbfs_media". To simplify porting existing code, every media source must support both "reading into pre-allocated memory (read)" and "read and return an allocated buffer (map)". For devices without native memory-mapped ROM, "cbfs_simple_buffer*" provides simple memory mapping simulation. Every CBFS function now takes a cbfs_media* as parameter. CBFS_DEFAULT_MEDIA is defined for CBFS functions to automatically initialize a per-board default media (CBFS will internally calls init_default_cbfs_media). Also revised CBFS function names relying on memory mapped backend (ex, "cbfs_find" => actually loads files). Now we only have two getters: struct cbfs_file *entry = cbfs_get_file(media, name); void *data = cbfs_get_file_content(CBFS_DEFAULT_MEDIA, name, type); Test results: - Verified to work on x86/qemu. - Compiles on ARM, and follow up commit will provide working SPI driver. Change-Id: Iac911ded25a6f2feffbf3101a81364625bb07746 Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2182 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-11-13Add spinlock to serialize Intel microcode updatesStefan Reinauer
Updating microcode on several threads in a core at once can be harmful. Hence add a spinlock to make sure that does not happen. Change-Id: I0c9526b6194202ae7ab5c66361fe04ce137372cc Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1778 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-09-05buildsystem: Make CPU microcode updating more configurableAlexandru Gagniuc
This patch aims to improve the microcode in CBFS handling that was brought by the last patches from Stefan and the Chromium team. Choices in Kconfig - 1) Generate microcode from tree (default) - 2) Include external microcode file - 3) Do not put microcode in CBFS The idea is to give the user full control over including non-free blobs in the final ROM image. MICROCODE_INCLUDE_PATH Kconfig variable is eliminated. Microcode is handled by a special class, cpu_microcode, as such: cpu_microcode-y += microcode_file.c MICROCODE_IN_CBFS should, in the future, be eliminated. Right now it is needed by intel microcode updating. Once all intel cpus are converted to cbfs updating, this variable can go away. These files are then compiled and assembled into a binary CBFS file. The advantage of doing it this way versus the current method is that 1) The rule is CPU-agnostic 2) Gives user more control over if and how to include microcode blobs 3) The rules for building the microcode binary are kept in src/cpu/Makefile.inc, and thus would not clobber the other makefiles, which are already overloaded and very difficult to navigate. Change-Id: I38d0c9851691aa112e93031860e94895857ebb76 Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1245 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Anton Kochkov <anton.kochkov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
2012-07-25Fix date output in Microcode updateStefan Reinauer
Date and time are mixed up: microcode: updated to revision 0x12 date=2012-12-04 should be microcode: updated to revision 0x12 date=2012-04-12 Change-Id: I85f9100f31d88bb831bef07131f361c92c7ef34e Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1334 Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de> Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2012-07-24Add code to read Intel microcode from CBFSVadim Bendebury
When CONFIG_MICROCODE_IN_CBFS is enabled, find the microcode blob in CBFS and pass it to intel_update_microcode() instead of using the compiled in array. CBFS accesses in pre-RAM and 'normal' environments are provided through different API. Change-Id: I35c1480edf87e550a7b88c4aadf079cf3ff86b5d Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1296 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2012-05-03Fix register corruption during Intel Microcode updateStefan Reinauer
Another bug in the Intel microcode update code that existed since we switched to LinuxBIOSv2 in 2004: The inline assembly code that reads the CPU revision from an MSR after running cpuid(1) trashes registers EBX and ECX. Only ECX was mentioned in the clobber list. C code running after this function could silently access completely wrong data, which resulted in the wrong date being printed on microcode updates (and potentially other issues happening until the C code writes to EBX again) Change-Id: Ida733fa1747565ec9824d3a37d08b1a73cd8355f Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/996 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
2012-05-02Don't include console.h in microcode.c when compiling with ROMCCStefan Reinauer
If microcode.c is built by romcc, this indicates that we are running microcode updates in the bootblock (e.g. before enabling cache as ram). In this case we did not enable any consoles yet, so we don't output anything. This patch removes inclusion of the unnecessary console/console.h for that case, which was breaking with certain configurations. Change-Id: Iebb57794d7b1e84cac253d249d47b88de4dd28a3 Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/988 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-04-26microcode: print date of microcode and unify outputStefan Reinauer
Most subsystems print their name with a colon, and then the message. Do the same thing for the microcode update code. Also, each microcode update has a date header. Print the date from that header to make it easier to determine whether you're running the latest microcode. Change-Id: Ic22947c4b9f0502d4091d975e1f1ab42f70aa1aa Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/929 Reviewed-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2012-04-26Revamp Intel microcode update codeStefan Reinauer
- add GPLv2 + copyright header after talking to Ron - "bits" in struct microcode served no real purpose but getting its address taken. Hence drop it - use asm volatile instead of __asm__ volatile - drop superfluous wrmsr (that seems to be harmless but is still wrong) in read_microcode_rev - use u32 instead of unsigned int where appropriate - make code usable both in bootblock and in ramstage - drop ROMCC style print_debug statements - drop microcode update copy in Sandybridge bootblock Change-Id: Iec4d5c7bfac210194caf577e8d72446e6dfb4b86 Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/928 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2010-05-26cosmetical changes on intel's microcode.cStefan Reinauer
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de> Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de> git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@5590 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
2010-04-27Since some people disapprove of white space cleanups mixed in regular commitsStefan Reinauer
while others dislike them being extra commits, let's clean them up once and for all for the existing code. If it's ugly, let it only be ugly once :-) Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de> Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de> git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@5507 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
2010-03-31Drop \r\n and \n\r as both print_XXX and printk now do this internally.Stefan Reinauer
Only some assembler files still have \r\n ... Can we move that part to C completely? Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de> Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de> git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@5342 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
2009-01-20fix compiler warnings (trivial)Stefan Reinauer
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de> Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de> git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3878 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
2004-10-14- Add new cvs code to cvsEric Biederman
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@1657 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1