coreboot.git - my copy of coreboot

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2014-02-12	PCI: Drop includes under cpu	Kyösti Mälkki
	The files affected do not make any PCI configuration calls. If they did, the more correct includes would be pci_ops.h, pci_defs.h and pci_ids.h. Change-Id: I3e7f009371be6ea50318eaabf0c15500cb3f1210 Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5200 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com> Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-11-24	haswell: Put each logical processor in its own P-state domain	Duncan Laurie
	The recommendation from Intel is to report each core as a separate logical domain in the _PSD table. This goes against the recommendation in the ACPI specification because all of these cores are on the same package and share a VR so they will do voltage transitions together. The reasoning is that with a larger number of logical processors the P-state often ramps too quickly resulting in higher power consumption. By exposing each core as a separate domain the OS can manage them individually allowing the socket to select the optimum frequency. $ cat /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/SSDT > /tmp/SSDT $ iasl -d /tmp/SSDT Processor (\_PR.CPU0, 0x00, 0x00000000, 0x00) { Name (_PSD, Package (0x01) { Package (0x05) { 0x05, 0x00, 0x00000000, 0x000000FE, 0x00000001 } }) } Processor (\_PR.CPU1, 0x01, 0x00000000, 0x00) { Name (_PSD, Package (0x01) { Package (0x05) { 0x05, 0x00, 0x00000001, 0x000000FE, 0x00000001 } }) } Processor (\_PR.CPU2, 0x02, 0x00000000, 0x00) { Name (_PSD, Package (0x01) { Package (0x05) { 0x05, 0x00, 0x00000002, 0x000000FE, 0x00000001 } }) } Processor (\_PR.CPU3, 0x03, 0x00000000, 0x00) { Name (_PSD, Package (0x01) { Package (0x05) { 0x05, 0x00, 0x00000003, 0x000000FE, 0x00000001 } }) } Change-Id: I5ef41b6ead4d88e9ba117003293dbc629c376803 Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/48662 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4130 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-03-21	lynxpoint: Add helper functions for reading PM and GPIO base	Duncan Laurie
	These base addresses are used in several places and it is helpful to have one location that is reading it. Change-Id: Ibf589247f37771f06c18e3e58f92aaf3f0d11271 Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2812 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-03-14	haswell: Add initial support for Haswell platforms	Aaron Durbin
	The Haswell parts use a PCH code named Lynx Point (Series 8). Therefore, the southbridge support is included as well. The basis for this code is the Sandybridge code. Management Engine, IRQ routing, and ACPI still requires more attention, but this is a good starting point. This code partially gets up through the romstage just before training memory on a Haswell reference board. Change-Id: If572d6c21ca051b486b82a924ca0ffe05c4d0ad4 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2616 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>