| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Change-Id: I125e40204f3a9602ee5810d341ef40f9f50d045b
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/48897
Reviewed-by: Idwer Vollering <vidwer@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
This can be done using in the INTERMEDIATE target in the proper place.
Change-Id: I28a7764205e0510be89c131058ec56861a479699
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46453
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-by: Christian Walter <christian.walter@9elements.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Since we now have more freedom in the bootblock linking step it no
longer makes sense to use a monolithic bootblock.S. Code segments must
still be included as the order in bootblock.S determines code flow.
However, non-code flow related assembly stubs don't need to be directly
included in bootblock.S
Change-Id: I08e86e92d82bd2138194ed42652f268b0764aa54
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11792
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
