| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Change-Id: Icae8042add5f4dd5c707369ffc4587c613d69d29
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/59324
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4315
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
When starting the Exynos5250 port, a lot of unneeded u-boot code
was imported. This is an attempt to get rid of a lot of unneeded
code before the port is used as a basis for further ARM ports.
There is a lot more that can be done, including cleaning up the
5250's Kconfig file.
Change-Id: I2d88676c436eea4b21bcb62f40018af9fabb3016
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3642
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
This gets rid of the clock-tick based sdelay in favor of udelay().
udelay() is more consistent and easier to work with, and this allows
us to carry one less variation of timers (and headers and sources...).
Every 1 unit in the sdelay() argument was assumed to cause a delay of
2 clock ticks (@1.7GHz). So the conversion factor is roughly:
sdelay(N) = udelay(((N * 2) / 1.7 * 10^9) * 10^6)
= udelay((N * 2) / (1.7 * 10^3))
The sdelay() periods used were:
sdelay(100) --> udelay(1)
sdelay(0x10000) --> udelay(78) (rounded up to udelay(100))
There was one instance of sdelay(10000), which looked like sort of a
typo since sdelay(0x10000) was used elsewhere. sdelay(10000) should
approximate to about 12us, so we'll stick with that for now and leave
a note.
Change-Id: I5e7407865ceafa701eea1d613bbe50cf4734f33e
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3079
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Payloads, by design, can return. There's lots of mechanism in the payload code
to support it, and the chooser payload relies on it. Hence, we should not mark
the function call in exit_stage as noreturn.
Not all ARM have unified caches, and it's not always easy to tell what
to do. So we are very paranoid. Before we call between stages, we
should carefully flush the dcache to memory and invalidate the icache.
This may be more than is necessary on all architectures but it
doesn't really hurt for the most part.
So compile cache management code into all stages, and call the
flush dcache/invalidate icache from all stages.
Change-Id: Ib9cc625c4dfd2d7d4b3c69a74686cc655a9d6484
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2462
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
To simplify testing ARM implementation, we need a QEMU configuration for
ARM. The qemu-armv7 provides serial output, CBFS simulation, and full
boot path (bootblock, romstage, ramstage) to verify the boot loader
functionality.
To run with QEMU:
export QEMU_AUDIO_DRV=none
qemu-system-arm -M vexpress-a9 -m 1024M -nographic -kernel build/coreboot.rom
Verified to boot until ramstage loaded successfully by QEMU v1.0.50.
Change-Id: I1f23ffaf408199811a0756236821c7e0f2a85004
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2354
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
