Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
MMIO operations are arch-agnostic so the include
path should not be arch/.
Change-Id: I0fd70f5aeca02e98e96b980c3aca0819f5c44b98
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31691
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I40f8b4c7cbc55e16929b1f40d18bb5a9c19845da
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29289
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I0903b7ca9eada4beacfcdbcacddec23c3515651e
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/16850
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
The lint-stable-004-style-labels check tries to verify that labels in c
and asm files start at the first column, and don't have whitespace in
front of them.
This fixes the 2 actual violations of the lint check.
Change-Id: Ia11a90d7301e62a116c7a9ef9b4c2bc3f982b308
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14193
Reviewed-by: Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
These licence headers were not compliant with the coreboot standard.
Change-Id: I85bb5f971ab1f8ac3e9589f712370fbf09716b67
Signed-off-by: Damien Roth <yves.r.roth@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/13287
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
This patch is a raw application of the following spatch to src/:
@@
expression A, V;
@@
- writel(V, A)
+ write32(A, V)
@@
expression A, V;
@@
- writew(V, A)
+ write16(A, V)
@@
expression A, V;
@@
- writeb(V, A)
+ write8(A, V)
@@
expression A;
@@
- readl(A)
+ read32(A)
@@
expression A;
@@
- readb(A)
+ read8(A)
BRANCH=none
BUG=chromium:444723
TEST=None (depends on next patch)
Change-Id: I5dd96490c85ee2bcbc669f08bc6fff0ecc0f9e27
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 64f643da95d85954c4d4ea91c34a5c69b9b08eb6
Original-Change-Id: I366a2eb5b3a0df2279ebcce572fe814894791c42
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/254864
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9836
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
This patch is a raw application of the following spatch to the
directories src/arch/arm(64)?, src/mainboard/<arm(64)-board>,
src/soc/<arm(64)-soc> and src/drivers/gic:
@@
expression A, V;
@@
- write32(V, A)
+ writel(V, A)
@@
expression A, V;
@@
- write16(V, A)
+ writew(V, A)
@@
expression A, V;
@@
- write8(V, A)
+ writeb(V, A)
This replaces all uses of write{32,16,8}() with write{l,w,b}()
which is currently equivalent and much more common. This is a
preparatory step that will allow us to easier flip them all at once to
the new write32(a,v) model.
BRANCH=none
BUG=chromium:451388
TEST=Compiled Cosmos, Daisy, Blaze, Pit, Ryu, Storm and Pinky.
Change-Id: I16016cd77780e7cadbabe7d8aa7ab465b95b8f09
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 93f0ada19b429b4e30d67335b4e61d0f43597b24
Original-Change-Id: I1ac01c67efef4656607663253ed298ff4d0ef89d
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/254862
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9834
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
gcc 4.8.3 broke on it, and the u-boot code that this was
derived from contains the same change.
Change-Id: I3936567a1bee3eceb469373a81e464b1238fdf9c
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7538
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
The memory initialization code is a work in progress for uboot, so we
only import the bits needed to get RAM up and running. Any refactoring
is cosmetic, and any functional refactoring should be done in separate
patches, and preferably, in coordination with the sunxi team.
Since it's not yet determined if we should initialize memory during
the bootblock or romstage, we don't add raminit to the build just yet.
Change-Id: I2ec1821942c6970150a02fa3806a257da649e1c9
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4597
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
|